Cargando…

A Comparison of Post-marketing Measures Imposed by Regulatory Agencies to Confirm the Tissue-Agnostic Approach

There are currently four anti-cancer medicinal products approved for a tissue-agnostic indication. This is an indication based on a common biological characteristic rather than the tissue of origin. To date, the regulatory experience with tissue-agnostic approvals is limited. Therefore, we compared...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulder, Jorn, van Stuijvenberg, Odile C., van Hennik, Paula B., Voest, Emile E., Pasmooij, Anna M. G., Stoyanova-Beninska, Violeta, de Boer, Anthonius
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35775007
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.893400
_version_ 1784736759828971520
author Mulder, Jorn
van Stuijvenberg, Odile C.
van Hennik, Paula B.
Voest, Emile E.
Pasmooij, Anna M. G.
Stoyanova-Beninska, Violeta
de Boer, Anthonius
author_facet Mulder, Jorn
van Stuijvenberg, Odile C.
van Hennik, Paula B.
Voest, Emile E.
Pasmooij, Anna M. G.
Stoyanova-Beninska, Violeta
de Boer, Anthonius
author_sort Mulder, Jorn
collection PubMed
description There are currently four anti-cancer medicinal products approved for a tissue-agnostic indication. This is an indication based on a common biological characteristic rather than the tissue of origin. To date, the regulatory experience with tissue-agnostic approvals is limited. Therefore, we compared decision-making aspects of the first tissue-agnostic approvals between the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). Post-marketing measures (PMMs) related to the tissue-agnostic indication were of specific interest. The main data source was the publicly available review documents. The following data were collected: submission date, approval date, clinical trials and datasets, and PMMs. At the time of data collection, the FDA and PMDA approved pembrolizumab, larotrectinib, and entrectinib for a tissue-agnostic indication, while the EMA approved larotrectinib and entrectinib for a tissue-agnostic indication. There were differences in analysis sets (integrated vs. non-integrated), submission dates and requests for data updates between agencies. All agencies had outstanding issues that needed to be addressed in the post-market setting. For pembrolizumab, larotrectinib and entrectinib, the number of imposed PMMs varied between one and eight, with the FDA requesting the most PMMs compared to the other two agencies. All agencies requested at least one PMM per approval to address the remaining uncertainties related to the tissue-agnostic indication. The FDA and EMA requested data from ongoing and proposed trials, while the PMDA requested data from use-result surveys. Confirmation of benefit in the post-marketing setting is an important aspect of tissue-agnostic approvals, regardless of agency. Nonetheless, each approach to confirm benefit has its inherent limitations. Post-marketing data will be essential for the regulatory and clinical decisions-making of medicinal products with a tissue-agnostic indication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9237332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92373322022-06-29 A Comparison of Post-marketing Measures Imposed by Regulatory Agencies to Confirm the Tissue-Agnostic Approach Mulder, Jorn van Stuijvenberg, Odile C. van Hennik, Paula B. Voest, Emile E. Pasmooij, Anna M. G. Stoyanova-Beninska, Violeta de Boer, Anthonius Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine There are currently four anti-cancer medicinal products approved for a tissue-agnostic indication. This is an indication based on a common biological characteristic rather than the tissue of origin. To date, the regulatory experience with tissue-agnostic approvals is limited. Therefore, we compared decision-making aspects of the first tissue-agnostic approvals between the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). Post-marketing measures (PMMs) related to the tissue-agnostic indication were of specific interest. The main data source was the publicly available review documents. The following data were collected: submission date, approval date, clinical trials and datasets, and PMMs. At the time of data collection, the FDA and PMDA approved pembrolizumab, larotrectinib, and entrectinib for a tissue-agnostic indication, while the EMA approved larotrectinib and entrectinib for a tissue-agnostic indication. There were differences in analysis sets (integrated vs. non-integrated), submission dates and requests for data updates between agencies. All agencies had outstanding issues that needed to be addressed in the post-market setting. For pembrolizumab, larotrectinib and entrectinib, the number of imposed PMMs varied between one and eight, with the FDA requesting the most PMMs compared to the other two agencies. All agencies requested at least one PMM per approval to address the remaining uncertainties related to the tissue-agnostic indication. The FDA and EMA requested data from ongoing and proposed trials, while the PMDA requested data from use-result surveys. Confirmation of benefit in the post-marketing setting is an important aspect of tissue-agnostic approvals, regardless of agency. Nonetheless, each approach to confirm benefit has its inherent limitations. Post-marketing data will be essential for the regulatory and clinical decisions-making of medicinal products with a tissue-agnostic indication. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9237332/ /pubmed/35775007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.893400 Text en Copyright © 2022 Mulder, van Stuijvenberg, van Hennik, Voest, Pasmooij, Stoyanova-Beninska and de Boer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Mulder, Jorn
van Stuijvenberg, Odile C.
van Hennik, Paula B.
Voest, Emile E.
Pasmooij, Anna M. G.
Stoyanova-Beninska, Violeta
de Boer, Anthonius
A Comparison of Post-marketing Measures Imposed by Regulatory Agencies to Confirm the Tissue-Agnostic Approach
title A Comparison of Post-marketing Measures Imposed by Regulatory Agencies to Confirm the Tissue-Agnostic Approach
title_full A Comparison of Post-marketing Measures Imposed by Regulatory Agencies to Confirm the Tissue-Agnostic Approach
title_fullStr A Comparison of Post-marketing Measures Imposed by Regulatory Agencies to Confirm the Tissue-Agnostic Approach
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Post-marketing Measures Imposed by Regulatory Agencies to Confirm the Tissue-Agnostic Approach
title_short A Comparison of Post-marketing Measures Imposed by Regulatory Agencies to Confirm the Tissue-Agnostic Approach
title_sort comparison of post-marketing measures imposed by regulatory agencies to confirm the tissue-agnostic approach
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35775007
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.893400
work_keys_str_mv AT mulderjorn acomparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach
AT vanstuijvenbergodilec acomparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach
AT vanhennikpaulab acomparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach
AT voestemilee acomparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach
AT pasmooijannamg acomparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach
AT stoyanovabeninskavioleta acomparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach
AT deboeranthonius acomparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach
AT mulderjorn comparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach
AT vanstuijvenbergodilec comparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach
AT vanhennikpaulab comparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach
AT voestemilee comparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach
AT pasmooijannamg comparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach
AT stoyanovabeninskavioleta comparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach
AT deboeranthonius comparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach