Cargando…
A Comparison of Post-marketing Measures Imposed by Regulatory Agencies to Confirm the Tissue-Agnostic Approach
There are currently four anti-cancer medicinal products approved for a tissue-agnostic indication. This is an indication based on a common biological characteristic rather than the tissue of origin. To date, the regulatory experience with tissue-agnostic approvals is limited. Therefore, we compared...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35775007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.893400 |
_version_ | 1784736759828971520 |
---|---|
author | Mulder, Jorn van Stuijvenberg, Odile C. van Hennik, Paula B. Voest, Emile E. Pasmooij, Anna M. G. Stoyanova-Beninska, Violeta de Boer, Anthonius |
author_facet | Mulder, Jorn van Stuijvenberg, Odile C. van Hennik, Paula B. Voest, Emile E. Pasmooij, Anna M. G. Stoyanova-Beninska, Violeta de Boer, Anthonius |
author_sort | Mulder, Jorn |
collection | PubMed |
description | There are currently four anti-cancer medicinal products approved for a tissue-agnostic indication. This is an indication based on a common biological characteristic rather than the tissue of origin. To date, the regulatory experience with tissue-agnostic approvals is limited. Therefore, we compared decision-making aspects of the first tissue-agnostic approvals between the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). Post-marketing measures (PMMs) related to the tissue-agnostic indication were of specific interest. The main data source was the publicly available review documents. The following data were collected: submission date, approval date, clinical trials and datasets, and PMMs. At the time of data collection, the FDA and PMDA approved pembrolizumab, larotrectinib, and entrectinib for a tissue-agnostic indication, while the EMA approved larotrectinib and entrectinib for a tissue-agnostic indication. There were differences in analysis sets (integrated vs. non-integrated), submission dates and requests for data updates between agencies. All agencies had outstanding issues that needed to be addressed in the post-market setting. For pembrolizumab, larotrectinib and entrectinib, the number of imposed PMMs varied between one and eight, with the FDA requesting the most PMMs compared to the other two agencies. All agencies requested at least one PMM per approval to address the remaining uncertainties related to the tissue-agnostic indication. The FDA and EMA requested data from ongoing and proposed trials, while the PMDA requested data from use-result surveys. Confirmation of benefit in the post-marketing setting is an important aspect of tissue-agnostic approvals, regardless of agency. Nonetheless, each approach to confirm benefit has its inherent limitations. Post-marketing data will be essential for the regulatory and clinical decisions-making of medicinal products with a tissue-agnostic indication. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9237332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92373322022-06-29 A Comparison of Post-marketing Measures Imposed by Regulatory Agencies to Confirm the Tissue-Agnostic Approach Mulder, Jorn van Stuijvenberg, Odile C. van Hennik, Paula B. Voest, Emile E. Pasmooij, Anna M. G. Stoyanova-Beninska, Violeta de Boer, Anthonius Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine There are currently four anti-cancer medicinal products approved for a tissue-agnostic indication. This is an indication based on a common biological characteristic rather than the tissue of origin. To date, the regulatory experience with tissue-agnostic approvals is limited. Therefore, we compared decision-making aspects of the first tissue-agnostic approvals between the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). Post-marketing measures (PMMs) related to the tissue-agnostic indication were of specific interest. The main data source was the publicly available review documents. The following data were collected: submission date, approval date, clinical trials and datasets, and PMMs. At the time of data collection, the FDA and PMDA approved pembrolizumab, larotrectinib, and entrectinib for a tissue-agnostic indication, while the EMA approved larotrectinib and entrectinib for a tissue-agnostic indication. There were differences in analysis sets (integrated vs. non-integrated), submission dates and requests for data updates between agencies. All agencies had outstanding issues that needed to be addressed in the post-market setting. For pembrolizumab, larotrectinib and entrectinib, the number of imposed PMMs varied between one and eight, with the FDA requesting the most PMMs compared to the other two agencies. All agencies requested at least one PMM per approval to address the remaining uncertainties related to the tissue-agnostic indication. The FDA and EMA requested data from ongoing and proposed trials, while the PMDA requested data from use-result surveys. Confirmation of benefit in the post-marketing setting is an important aspect of tissue-agnostic approvals, regardless of agency. Nonetheless, each approach to confirm benefit has its inherent limitations. Post-marketing data will be essential for the regulatory and clinical decisions-making of medicinal products with a tissue-agnostic indication. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9237332/ /pubmed/35775007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.893400 Text en Copyright © 2022 Mulder, van Stuijvenberg, van Hennik, Voest, Pasmooij, Stoyanova-Beninska and de Boer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Mulder, Jorn van Stuijvenberg, Odile C. van Hennik, Paula B. Voest, Emile E. Pasmooij, Anna M. G. Stoyanova-Beninska, Violeta de Boer, Anthonius A Comparison of Post-marketing Measures Imposed by Regulatory Agencies to Confirm the Tissue-Agnostic Approach |
title | A Comparison of Post-marketing Measures Imposed by Regulatory Agencies to Confirm the Tissue-Agnostic Approach |
title_full | A Comparison of Post-marketing Measures Imposed by Regulatory Agencies to Confirm the Tissue-Agnostic Approach |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Post-marketing Measures Imposed by Regulatory Agencies to Confirm the Tissue-Agnostic Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Post-marketing Measures Imposed by Regulatory Agencies to Confirm the Tissue-Agnostic Approach |
title_short | A Comparison of Post-marketing Measures Imposed by Regulatory Agencies to Confirm the Tissue-Agnostic Approach |
title_sort | comparison of post-marketing measures imposed by regulatory agencies to confirm the tissue-agnostic approach |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35775007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.893400 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mulderjorn acomparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach AT vanstuijvenbergodilec acomparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach AT vanhennikpaulab acomparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach AT voestemilee acomparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach AT pasmooijannamg acomparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach AT stoyanovabeninskavioleta acomparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach AT deboeranthonius acomparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach AT mulderjorn comparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach AT vanstuijvenbergodilec comparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach AT vanhennikpaulab comparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach AT voestemilee comparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach AT pasmooijannamg comparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach AT stoyanovabeninskavioleta comparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach AT deboeranthonius comparisonofpostmarketingmeasuresimposedbyregulatoryagenciestoconfirmthetissueagnosticapproach |