Cargando…
Offline Parietal Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation or Alpha Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Has No Effect on Visuospatial or Temporal Attention
Non-invasive brain stimulation is a growing field with potentially wide-ranging clinical and basic science applications due to its ability to transiently and safely change brain excitability. In this study we include two types of stimulation: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35774555 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.903977 |
_version_ | 1784736794835681280 |
---|---|
author | Moretti, Jessica Marinovic, Welber Harvey, Alan R. Rodger, Jennifer Visser, Troy A. W. |
author_facet | Moretti, Jessica Marinovic, Welber Harvey, Alan R. Rodger, Jennifer Visser, Troy A. W. |
author_sort | Moretti, Jessica |
collection | PubMed |
description | Non-invasive brain stimulation is a growing field with potentially wide-ranging clinical and basic science applications due to its ability to transiently and safely change brain excitability. In this study we include two types of stimulation: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Single session stimulations with either technique have previously been reported to induce changes in attention. To better understand and compare the effectiveness of each technique and the basis of their effects on cognition we assessed changes to both temporal and visuospatial attention using an attentional blink task and a line bisection task following offline stimulation with an intermittent theta burst (iTBS) rTMS protocol or 10 Hz tACS. Additionally, we included a novel rTMS stimulation technique, low-intensity (LI-)rTMS, also using an iTBS protocol, which uses stimulation intensities an order of magnitude below conventional rTMS. Animal models show that low-intensity rTMS modulates cortical excitability despite sub-action potential threshold stimulation. Stimulation was delivered in healthy participants over the right posterior parietal cortex (rPPC) using a within-subjects design (n = 24). Analyses showed no evidence for an effect of any stimulation technique on spatial biases in the line bisection task or on magnitude of the attentional blink. Our results suggests that rTMS and LI-rTMS using iTBS protocol and 10 Hz tACS over rPPC do not modulate performance in tasks assessing visuospatial or temporal attention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9237453 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92374532022-06-29 Offline Parietal Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation or Alpha Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Has No Effect on Visuospatial or Temporal Attention Moretti, Jessica Marinovic, Welber Harvey, Alan R. Rodger, Jennifer Visser, Troy A. W. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Non-invasive brain stimulation is a growing field with potentially wide-ranging clinical and basic science applications due to its ability to transiently and safely change brain excitability. In this study we include two types of stimulation: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Single session stimulations with either technique have previously been reported to induce changes in attention. To better understand and compare the effectiveness of each technique and the basis of their effects on cognition we assessed changes to both temporal and visuospatial attention using an attentional blink task and a line bisection task following offline stimulation with an intermittent theta burst (iTBS) rTMS protocol or 10 Hz tACS. Additionally, we included a novel rTMS stimulation technique, low-intensity (LI-)rTMS, also using an iTBS protocol, which uses stimulation intensities an order of magnitude below conventional rTMS. Animal models show that low-intensity rTMS modulates cortical excitability despite sub-action potential threshold stimulation. Stimulation was delivered in healthy participants over the right posterior parietal cortex (rPPC) using a within-subjects design (n = 24). Analyses showed no evidence for an effect of any stimulation technique on spatial biases in the line bisection task or on magnitude of the attentional blink. Our results suggests that rTMS and LI-rTMS using iTBS protocol and 10 Hz tACS over rPPC do not modulate performance in tasks assessing visuospatial or temporal attention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9237453/ /pubmed/35774555 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.903977 Text en Copyright © 2022 Moretti, Marinovic, Harvey, Rodger and Visser. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Moretti, Jessica Marinovic, Welber Harvey, Alan R. Rodger, Jennifer Visser, Troy A. W. Offline Parietal Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation or Alpha Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Has No Effect on Visuospatial or Temporal Attention |
title | Offline Parietal Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation or Alpha Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Has No Effect on Visuospatial or Temporal Attention |
title_full | Offline Parietal Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation or Alpha Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Has No Effect on Visuospatial or Temporal Attention |
title_fullStr | Offline Parietal Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation or Alpha Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Has No Effect on Visuospatial or Temporal Attention |
title_full_unstemmed | Offline Parietal Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation or Alpha Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Has No Effect on Visuospatial or Temporal Attention |
title_short | Offline Parietal Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation or Alpha Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Has No Effect on Visuospatial or Temporal Attention |
title_sort | offline parietal intermittent theta burst stimulation or alpha frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation has no effect on visuospatial or temporal attention |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35774555 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.903977 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morettijessica offlineparietalintermittentthetaburststimulationoralphafrequencytranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationhasnoeffectonvisuospatialortemporalattention AT marinovicwelber offlineparietalintermittentthetaburststimulationoralphafrequencytranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationhasnoeffectonvisuospatialortemporalattention AT harveyalanr offlineparietalintermittentthetaburststimulationoralphafrequencytranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationhasnoeffectonvisuospatialortemporalattention AT rodgerjennifer offlineparietalintermittentthetaburststimulationoralphafrequencytranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationhasnoeffectonvisuospatialortemporalattention AT vissertroyaw offlineparietalintermittentthetaburststimulationoralphafrequencytranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationhasnoeffectonvisuospatialortemporalattention |