Cargando…

Offline Parietal Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation or Alpha Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Has No Effect on Visuospatial or Temporal Attention

Non-invasive brain stimulation is a growing field with potentially wide-ranging clinical and basic science applications due to its ability to transiently and safely change brain excitability. In this study we include two types of stimulation: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moretti, Jessica, Marinovic, Welber, Harvey, Alan R., Rodger, Jennifer, Visser, Troy A. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35774555
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.903977
_version_ 1784736794835681280
author Moretti, Jessica
Marinovic, Welber
Harvey, Alan R.
Rodger, Jennifer
Visser, Troy A. W.
author_facet Moretti, Jessica
Marinovic, Welber
Harvey, Alan R.
Rodger, Jennifer
Visser, Troy A. W.
author_sort Moretti, Jessica
collection PubMed
description Non-invasive brain stimulation is a growing field with potentially wide-ranging clinical and basic science applications due to its ability to transiently and safely change brain excitability. In this study we include two types of stimulation: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Single session stimulations with either technique have previously been reported to induce changes in attention. To better understand and compare the effectiveness of each technique and the basis of their effects on cognition we assessed changes to both temporal and visuospatial attention using an attentional blink task and a line bisection task following offline stimulation with an intermittent theta burst (iTBS) rTMS protocol or 10 Hz tACS. Additionally, we included a novel rTMS stimulation technique, low-intensity (LI-)rTMS, also using an iTBS protocol, which uses stimulation intensities an order of magnitude below conventional rTMS. Animal models show that low-intensity rTMS modulates cortical excitability despite sub-action potential threshold stimulation. Stimulation was delivered in healthy participants over the right posterior parietal cortex (rPPC) using a within-subjects design (n = 24). Analyses showed no evidence for an effect of any stimulation technique on spatial biases in the line bisection task or on magnitude of the attentional blink. Our results suggests that rTMS and LI-rTMS using iTBS protocol and 10 Hz tACS over rPPC do not modulate performance in tasks assessing visuospatial or temporal attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9237453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92374532022-06-29 Offline Parietal Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation or Alpha Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Has No Effect on Visuospatial or Temporal Attention Moretti, Jessica Marinovic, Welber Harvey, Alan R. Rodger, Jennifer Visser, Troy A. W. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Non-invasive brain stimulation is a growing field with potentially wide-ranging clinical and basic science applications due to its ability to transiently and safely change brain excitability. In this study we include two types of stimulation: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Single session stimulations with either technique have previously been reported to induce changes in attention. To better understand and compare the effectiveness of each technique and the basis of their effects on cognition we assessed changes to both temporal and visuospatial attention using an attentional blink task and a line bisection task following offline stimulation with an intermittent theta burst (iTBS) rTMS protocol or 10 Hz tACS. Additionally, we included a novel rTMS stimulation technique, low-intensity (LI-)rTMS, also using an iTBS protocol, which uses stimulation intensities an order of magnitude below conventional rTMS. Animal models show that low-intensity rTMS modulates cortical excitability despite sub-action potential threshold stimulation. Stimulation was delivered in healthy participants over the right posterior parietal cortex (rPPC) using a within-subjects design (n = 24). Analyses showed no evidence for an effect of any stimulation technique on spatial biases in the line bisection task or on magnitude of the attentional blink. Our results suggests that rTMS and LI-rTMS using iTBS protocol and 10 Hz tACS over rPPC do not modulate performance in tasks assessing visuospatial or temporal attention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9237453/ /pubmed/35774555 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.903977 Text en Copyright © 2022 Moretti, Marinovic, Harvey, Rodger and Visser. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Moretti, Jessica
Marinovic, Welber
Harvey, Alan R.
Rodger, Jennifer
Visser, Troy A. W.
Offline Parietal Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation or Alpha Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Has No Effect on Visuospatial or Temporal Attention
title Offline Parietal Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation or Alpha Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Has No Effect on Visuospatial or Temporal Attention
title_full Offline Parietal Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation or Alpha Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Has No Effect on Visuospatial or Temporal Attention
title_fullStr Offline Parietal Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation or Alpha Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Has No Effect on Visuospatial or Temporal Attention
title_full_unstemmed Offline Parietal Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation or Alpha Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Has No Effect on Visuospatial or Temporal Attention
title_short Offline Parietal Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation or Alpha Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Has No Effect on Visuospatial or Temporal Attention
title_sort offline parietal intermittent theta burst stimulation or alpha frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation has no effect on visuospatial or temporal attention
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35774555
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.903977
work_keys_str_mv AT morettijessica offlineparietalintermittentthetaburststimulationoralphafrequencytranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationhasnoeffectonvisuospatialortemporalattention
AT marinovicwelber offlineparietalintermittentthetaburststimulationoralphafrequencytranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationhasnoeffectonvisuospatialortemporalattention
AT harveyalanr offlineparietalintermittentthetaburststimulationoralphafrequencytranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationhasnoeffectonvisuospatialortemporalattention
AT rodgerjennifer offlineparietalintermittentthetaburststimulationoralphafrequencytranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationhasnoeffectonvisuospatialortemporalattention
AT vissertroyaw offlineparietalintermittentthetaburststimulationoralphafrequencytranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationhasnoeffectonvisuospatialortemporalattention