Cargando…

Balloon Angioplasty vs. Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis

AIMS: We performed a meta-analysis to indirectly compare the treatment effectiveness of balloon angioplasty and stenting for patients with intracranial arterial stenosis. METHODS: Literature searches were performed in well-known databases to identify eligible studies published before January 04, 202...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Yaxuan, Li, Xihua, Ding, Yongxia, Han, Bin, Wang, Jing, Meng, Kun, Han, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35775041
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.878179
_version_ 1784736801510916096
author Sun, Yaxuan
Li, Xihua
Ding, Yongxia
Han, Bin
Wang, Jing
Meng, Kun
Han, Yan
author_facet Sun, Yaxuan
Li, Xihua
Ding, Yongxia
Han, Bin
Wang, Jing
Meng, Kun
Han, Yan
author_sort Sun, Yaxuan
collection PubMed
description AIMS: We performed a meta-analysis to indirectly compare the treatment effectiveness of balloon angioplasty and stenting for patients with intracranial arterial stenosis. METHODS: Literature searches were performed in well-known databases to identify eligible studies published before January 04, 2021. The incidence of restenosis, transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke, death, and dissection after balloon angioplasty or stenting were pooled. An indirect comparison of balloon angioplasty vs. stenting was performed, and the ratios of incidence (RIs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model. RESULTS: 120 studies that recruited 10,107 patients with intracranial arterial stenosis were included. The pooled incidence of restenosis after balloon angioplasty and stenting were 13% (95%CI: 8-17%) and 11% (95%CI: 9-13%), respectively, with no significant difference between them (RI: 1.18; 95%CI: 0.78–1.80; P = 0.435). Moreover, the pooled incidence of TIA after balloon angioplasty and stenting was 3% (95%CI: 0–6%) and 4% (95%CI: 3%-5%), and no significant difference was observed (RI: 0.75; 95%CI: 0.01–58.53; P = 0.897). The pooled incidence of stroke after balloon angioplasty and stenting was 7% (95%CI: 5–9%) and 8% (95%CI: 7–9%), respectively, and the difference between groups was found to be statistically insignificant (RI: 0.88; 95%CI: 0.64–1.20; P = 0.413). Additionally, the pooled incidence of death after balloon angioplasty and stenting was 2% (95%CI: 1–4%) and 2% (95%CI: 1–2%), with no significant difference between groups (RI: 1.00; 95%CI: 0.44–2.27; P = 1.000). Finally, the pooled incidence of dissection after balloon angioplasty and stenting was 13% (95%CI: 5–22%) and 3% (95%CI: 2–5%), respectively, and balloon angioplasty was associated with a higher risk of dissection than that with stenting for patients with intracranial arterial stenosis (RI: 4.33; 95%CI: 1.81–10.35; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study found that the treatment effectiveness of balloon angioplasty and stenting were similar for patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9237476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92374762022-06-29 Balloon Angioplasty vs. Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis Sun, Yaxuan Li, Xihua Ding, Yongxia Han, Bin Wang, Jing Meng, Kun Han, Yan Front Neurol Neurology AIMS: We performed a meta-analysis to indirectly compare the treatment effectiveness of balloon angioplasty and stenting for patients with intracranial arterial stenosis. METHODS: Literature searches were performed in well-known databases to identify eligible studies published before January 04, 2021. The incidence of restenosis, transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke, death, and dissection after balloon angioplasty or stenting were pooled. An indirect comparison of balloon angioplasty vs. stenting was performed, and the ratios of incidence (RIs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model. RESULTS: 120 studies that recruited 10,107 patients with intracranial arterial stenosis were included. The pooled incidence of restenosis after balloon angioplasty and stenting were 13% (95%CI: 8-17%) and 11% (95%CI: 9-13%), respectively, with no significant difference between them (RI: 1.18; 95%CI: 0.78–1.80; P = 0.435). Moreover, the pooled incidence of TIA after balloon angioplasty and stenting was 3% (95%CI: 0–6%) and 4% (95%CI: 3%-5%), and no significant difference was observed (RI: 0.75; 95%CI: 0.01–58.53; P = 0.897). The pooled incidence of stroke after balloon angioplasty and stenting was 7% (95%CI: 5–9%) and 8% (95%CI: 7–9%), respectively, and the difference between groups was found to be statistically insignificant (RI: 0.88; 95%CI: 0.64–1.20; P = 0.413). Additionally, the pooled incidence of death after balloon angioplasty and stenting was 2% (95%CI: 1–4%) and 2% (95%CI: 1–2%), with no significant difference between groups (RI: 1.00; 95%CI: 0.44–2.27; P = 1.000). Finally, the pooled incidence of dissection after balloon angioplasty and stenting was 13% (95%CI: 5–22%) and 3% (95%CI: 2–5%), respectively, and balloon angioplasty was associated with a higher risk of dissection than that with stenting for patients with intracranial arterial stenosis (RI: 4.33; 95%CI: 1.81–10.35; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study found that the treatment effectiveness of balloon angioplasty and stenting were similar for patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9237476/ /pubmed/35775041 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.878179 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sun, Li, Ding, Han, Wang, Meng and Han. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Sun, Yaxuan
Li, Xihua
Ding, Yongxia
Han, Bin
Wang, Jing
Meng, Kun
Han, Yan
Balloon Angioplasty vs. Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis
title Balloon Angioplasty vs. Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis
title_full Balloon Angioplasty vs. Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis
title_fullStr Balloon Angioplasty vs. Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Balloon Angioplasty vs. Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis
title_short Balloon Angioplasty vs. Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis
title_sort balloon angioplasty vs. stenting for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35775041
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.878179
work_keys_str_mv AT sunyaxuan balloonangioplastyvsstentingforsymptomaticintracranialarterialstenosis
AT lixihua balloonangioplastyvsstentingforsymptomaticintracranialarterialstenosis
AT dingyongxia balloonangioplastyvsstentingforsymptomaticintracranialarterialstenosis
AT hanbin balloonangioplastyvsstentingforsymptomaticintracranialarterialstenosis
AT wangjing balloonangioplastyvsstentingforsymptomaticintracranialarterialstenosis
AT mengkun balloonangioplastyvsstentingforsymptomaticintracranialarterialstenosis
AT hanyan balloonangioplastyvsstentingforsymptomaticintracranialarterialstenosis