Cargando…

Field Validation of a Non-carcinogenic and Eco-Friendly Disinfectant in a Stand-In Footbath for Treatment of Footrot Associated With aprV2-Positive Strains of Dichelobacter nodosus in Swiss Sheep Flocks

A national control program for virulent footrot is currently planned in Switzerland. Since commonly used disinfectants either contain heavy metals or are carcinogenic, the aim of this study was to verify the effectiveness of an eco-friendly and non-carcinogenic candidate disinfectant against aprV2-p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmid, Robin Michael, Steiner, Adrian, Becker, Jens, Baumberger, Sandra, Dürr, Salome, Alsaaod, Maher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35774977
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.812638
_version_ 1784736917832597504
author Schmid, Robin Michael
Steiner, Adrian
Becker, Jens
Baumberger, Sandra
Dürr, Salome
Alsaaod, Maher
author_facet Schmid, Robin Michael
Steiner, Adrian
Becker, Jens
Baumberger, Sandra
Dürr, Salome
Alsaaod, Maher
author_sort Schmid, Robin Michael
collection PubMed
description A national control program for virulent footrot is currently planned in Switzerland. Since commonly used disinfectants either contain heavy metals or are carcinogenic, the aim of this study was to verify the effectiveness of an eco-friendly and non-carcinogenic candidate disinfectant against aprV2-positive strains of Dichelobacter nodosus. Additionally, the effect of the selective use of long-acting oxytetracyclines was evaluated. A total of 18 farms with confirmed footrot infection, randomly allocated to two treatment groups: (1) with antibiotics (AB; n = 9) and, (2) no antibiotics (NAB; n = 9), were included. Claws were carefully trimmed and scored using a scale from 0 (clinically healthy) to 5 (complete loss of the horn capsule) and a prewash waterbath was implemented on 11 farms. Twice-weekly, repeated whole-flock stand-in footbaths with the candidate disinfectant (6%) were performed. Additionally, animals of group AB with a score ≥ 3 were administered oxytetracyclines by injection. On all farms, 10 days after last treatment, aprV2-positive strains could not be detected by risk-based sampling for real-time PCR analysis after 7–21 (median = 12) footbaths with a minimal culling rate of non-responders on nine farms. Farms without contact to other sheep remained without clinical signs of footrot for a minimum of 245 days (mean ± standard deviation: 293.6 ± 23.6). Antibiotic treatment did not reduce the number of footbaths needed. In contrast, a mean of 3.3 disinfecting footbaths could be saved by implementing a prewash waterbath. At animal level, individual and selective use of oxytetracyclines lead to a higher chance (odds ratio = 9.95; 95% CI: 3.54–27.95; p < 0.001) for a lesion score ≥ 3 to improve to a lesion score < 3 within 2 weeks compared to treatment without antibiotics. The test disinfectant is an effective and eco-friendly alternative for the planned Swiss footrot control program and selective use of oxytetracycline has a beneficial impact on the recovery of animals with lesion scores ≥ 3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9237958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92379582022-06-29 Field Validation of a Non-carcinogenic and Eco-Friendly Disinfectant in a Stand-In Footbath for Treatment of Footrot Associated With aprV2-Positive Strains of Dichelobacter nodosus in Swiss Sheep Flocks Schmid, Robin Michael Steiner, Adrian Becker, Jens Baumberger, Sandra Dürr, Salome Alsaaod, Maher Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science A national control program for virulent footrot is currently planned in Switzerland. Since commonly used disinfectants either contain heavy metals or are carcinogenic, the aim of this study was to verify the effectiveness of an eco-friendly and non-carcinogenic candidate disinfectant against aprV2-positive strains of Dichelobacter nodosus. Additionally, the effect of the selective use of long-acting oxytetracyclines was evaluated. A total of 18 farms with confirmed footrot infection, randomly allocated to two treatment groups: (1) with antibiotics (AB; n = 9) and, (2) no antibiotics (NAB; n = 9), were included. Claws were carefully trimmed and scored using a scale from 0 (clinically healthy) to 5 (complete loss of the horn capsule) and a prewash waterbath was implemented on 11 farms. Twice-weekly, repeated whole-flock stand-in footbaths with the candidate disinfectant (6%) were performed. Additionally, animals of group AB with a score ≥ 3 were administered oxytetracyclines by injection. On all farms, 10 days after last treatment, aprV2-positive strains could not be detected by risk-based sampling for real-time PCR analysis after 7–21 (median = 12) footbaths with a minimal culling rate of non-responders on nine farms. Farms without contact to other sheep remained without clinical signs of footrot for a minimum of 245 days (mean ± standard deviation: 293.6 ± 23.6). Antibiotic treatment did not reduce the number of footbaths needed. In contrast, a mean of 3.3 disinfecting footbaths could be saved by implementing a prewash waterbath. At animal level, individual and selective use of oxytetracyclines lead to a higher chance (odds ratio = 9.95; 95% CI: 3.54–27.95; p < 0.001) for a lesion score ≥ 3 to improve to a lesion score < 3 within 2 weeks compared to treatment without antibiotics. The test disinfectant is an effective and eco-friendly alternative for the planned Swiss footrot control program and selective use of oxytetracycline has a beneficial impact on the recovery of animals with lesion scores ≥ 3. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9237958/ /pubmed/35774977 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.812638 Text en Copyright © 2022 Schmid, Steiner, Becker, Baumberger, Dürr and Alsaaod. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Schmid, Robin Michael
Steiner, Adrian
Becker, Jens
Baumberger, Sandra
Dürr, Salome
Alsaaod, Maher
Field Validation of a Non-carcinogenic and Eco-Friendly Disinfectant in a Stand-In Footbath for Treatment of Footrot Associated With aprV2-Positive Strains of Dichelobacter nodosus in Swiss Sheep Flocks
title Field Validation of a Non-carcinogenic and Eco-Friendly Disinfectant in a Stand-In Footbath for Treatment of Footrot Associated With aprV2-Positive Strains of Dichelobacter nodosus in Swiss Sheep Flocks
title_full Field Validation of a Non-carcinogenic and Eco-Friendly Disinfectant in a Stand-In Footbath for Treatment of Footrot Associated With aprV2-Positive Strains of Dichelobacter nodosus in Swiss Sheep Flocks
title_fullStr Field Validation of a Non-carcinogenic and Eco-Friendly Disinfectant in a Stand-In Footbath for Treatment of Footrot Associated With aprV2-Positive Strains of Dichelobacter nodosus in Swiss Sheep Flocks
title_full_unstemmed Field Validation of a Non-carcinogenic and Eco-Friendly Disinfectant in a Stand-In Footbath for Treatment of Footrot Associated With aprV2-Positive Strains of Dichelobacter nodosus in Swiss Sheep Flocks
title_short Field Validation of a Non-carcinogenic and Eco-Friendly Disinfectant in a Stand-In Footbath for Treatment of Footrot Associated With aprV2-Positive Strains of Dichelobacter nodosus in Swiss Sheep Flocks
title_sort field validation of a non-carcinogenic and eco-friendly disinfectant in a stand-in footbath for treatment of footrot associated with aprv2-positive strains of dichelobacter nodosus in swiss sheep flocks
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35774977
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.812638
work_keys_str_mv AT schmidrobinmichael fieldvalidationofanoncarcinogenicandecofriendlydisinfectantinastandinfootbathfortreatmentoffootrotassociatedwithaprv2positivestrainsofdichelobacternodosusinswisssheepflocks
AT steineradrian fieldvalidationofanoncarcinogenicandecofriendlydisinfectantinastandinfootbathfortreatmentoffootrotassociatedwithaprv2positivestrainsofdichelobacternodosusinswisssheepflocks
AT beckerjens fieldvalidationofanoncarcinogenicandecofriendlydisinfectantinastandinfootbathfortreatmentoffootrotassociatedwithaprv2positivestrainsofdichelobacternodosusinswisssheepflocks
AT baumbergersandra fieldvalidationofanoncarcinogenicandecofriendlydisinfectantinastandinfootbathfortreatmentoffootrotassociatedwithaprv2positivestrainsofdichelobacternodosusinswisssheepflocks
AT durrsalome fieldvalidationofanoncarcinogenicandecofriendlydisinfectantinastandinfootbathfortreatmentoffootrotassociatedwithaprv2positivestrainsofdichelobacternodosusinswisssheepflocks
AT alsaaodmaher fieldvalidationofanoncarcinogenicandecofriendlydisinfectantinastandinfootbathfortreatmentoffootrotassociatedwithaprv2positivestrainsofdichelobacternodosusinswisssheepflocks