Cargando…
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be a cost-effective alternative to antidepressant therapy after two treatment failures in patients with major depressive disorder
BACKGROUND: The cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) who have not responded to two adequate treatments with antidepressants (TRD) are still unclear. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of add-on repetitive Transcrani...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35764989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04078-9 |
_version_ | 1784736950321676288 |
---|---|
author | Zemplényi, Antal Józwiak-Hagymásy, Judit Kovács, Sándor Erdősi, Dalma Boncz, Imre Tényi, Tamás Osváth, Péter Voros, Viktor |
author_facet | Zemplényi, Antal Józwiak-Hagymásy, Judit Kovács, Sándor Erdősi, Dalma Boncz, Imre Tényi, Tamás Osváth, Péter Voros, Viktor |
author_sort | Zemplényi, Antal |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) who have not responded to two adequate treatments with antidepressants (TRD) are still unclear. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of add-on repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) compared with standard treatment. METHODS: A Markov-model simulated clinical events over one year from the perspective of healthcare payer. Third- and fourth-line treatment pathways (augmentation, antidepressant switch or combination, and Electro-Convulsive Therapy (ECT)) were defined based on medical practice guidelines. Transition probabilities were derived from a recent meta-analysis and scientific publications. Resource utilization and cost estimates were based on the patient-level database of a large university hospital. RESULTS: Incremental Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) and costs were 0.053 and 785 €, respectively, corresponding to an Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of 14,670 € per QALY. The difference in cost between standard treatment and rTMS is explained by the rTMS sessions used in acute (€660) and maintenance (€57/month) treatments, partly offset by lower hospital costs due to higher remission rates in the rTMS arm. Key parameters driving the ICER were incremental utility of remission, unit cost of rTMS treatment and remission rate. At a threshold of €22,243 add-on rTMS is a cost-effective alternative to pharmacotherapy. Evidence on long-term effectiveness is not yet available, so results are estimated for a one-year period. CONCLUSION: Not only does rTMS treatment have beneficial clinical effects compared with drug therapy in TRD, but it also appears to offer good value-for-money, especially in centres with larger numbers of patients where unit costs can be kept low. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-022-04078-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9238085 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92380852022-06-29 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be a cost-effective alternative to antidepressant therapy after two treatment failures in patients with major depressive disorder Zemplényi, Antal Józwiak-Hagymásy, Judit Kovács, Sándor Erdősi, Dalma Boncz, Imre Tényi, Tamás Osváth, Péter Voros, Viktor BMC Psychiatry Research BACKGROUND: The cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) who have not responded to two adequate treatments with antidepressants (TRD) are still unclear. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of add-on repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) compared with standard treatment. METHODS: A Markov-model simulated clinical events over one year from the perspective of healthcare payer. Third- and fourth-line treatment pathways (augmentation, antidepressant switch or combination, and Electro-Convulsive Therapy (ECT)) were defined based on medical practice guidelines. Transition probabilities were derived from a recent meta-analysis and scientific publications. Resource utilization and cost estimates were based on the patient-level database of a large university hospital. RESULTS: Incremental Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) and costs were 0.053 and 785 €, respectively, corresponding to an Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of 14,670 € per QALY. The difference in cost between standard treatment and rTMS is explained by the rTMS sessions used in acute (€660) and maintenance (€57/month) treatments, partly offset by lower hospital costs due to higher remission rates in the rTMS arm. Key parameters driving the ICER were incremental utility of remission, unit cost of rTMS treatment and remission rate. At a threshold of €22,243 add-on rTMS is a cost-effective alternative to pharmacotherapy. Evidence on long-term effectiveness is not yet available, so results are estimated for a one-year period. CONCLUSION: Not only does rTMS treatment have beneficial clinical effects compared with drug therapy in TRD, but it also appears to offer good value-for-money, especially in centres with larger numbers of patients where unit costs can be kept low. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-022-04078-9. BioMed Central 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9238085/ /pubmed/35764989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04078-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Zemplényi, Antal Józwiak-Hagymásy, Judit Kovács, Sándor Erdősi, Dalma Boncz, Imre Tényi, Tamás Osváth, Péter Voros, Viktor Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be a cost-effective alternative to antidepressant therapy after two treatment failures in patients with major depressive disorder |
title | Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be a cost-effective alternative to antidepressant therapy after two treatment failures in patients with major depressive disorder |
title_full | Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be a cost-effective alternative to antidepressant therapy after two treatment failures in patients with major depressive disorder |
title_fullStr | Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be a cost-effective alternative to antidepressant therapy after two treatment failures in patients with major depressive disorder |
title_full_unstemmed | Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be a cost-effective alternative to antidepressant therapy after two treatment failures in patients with major depressive disorder |
title_short | Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be a cost-effective alternative to antidepressant therapy after two treatment failures in patients with major depressive disorder |
title_sort | repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be a cost-effective alternative to antidepressant therapy after two treatment failures in patients with major depressive disorder |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35764989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04078-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zemplenyiantal repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationmaybeacosteffectivealternativetoantidepressanttherapyaftertwotreatmentfailuresinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorder AT jozwiakhagymasyjudit repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationmaybeacosteffectivealternativetoantidepressanttherapyaftertwotreatmentfailuresinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorder AT kovacssandor repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationmaybeacosteffectivealternativetoantidepressanttherapyaftertwotreatmentfailuresinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorder AT erdosidalma repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationmaybeacosteffectivealternativetoantidepressanttherapyaftertwotreatmentfailuresinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorder AT bonczimre repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationmaybeacosteffectivealternativetoantidepressanttherapyaftertwotreatmentfailuresinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorder AT tenyitamas repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationmaybeacosteffectivealternativetoantidepressanttherapyaftertwotreatmentfailuresinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorder AT osvathpeter repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationmaybeacosteffectivealternativetoantidepressanttherapyaftertwotreatmentfailuresinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorder AT vorosviktor repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationmaybeacosteffectivealternativetoantidepressanttherapyaftertwotreatmentfailuresinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorder |