Cargando…

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be a cost-effective alternative to antidepressant therapy after two treatment failures in patients with major depressive disorder

BACKGROUND: The cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) who have not responded to two adequate treatments with antidepressants (TRD) are still unclear. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of add-on repetitive Transcrani...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zemplényi, Antal, Józwiak-Hagymásy, Judit, Kovács, Sándor, Erdősi, Dalma, Boncz, Imre, Tényi, Tamás, Osváth, Péter, Voros, Viktor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35764989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04078-9
_version_ 1784736950321676288
author Zemplényi, Antal
Józwiak-Hagymásy, Judit
Kovács, Sándor
Erdősi, Dalma
Boncz, Imre
Tényi, Tamás
Osváth, Péter
Voros, Viktor
author_facet Zemplényi, Antal
Józwiak-Hagymásy, Judit
Kovács, Sándor
Erdősi, Dalma
Boncz, Imre
Tényi, Tamás
Osváth, Péter
Voros, Viktor
author_sort Zemplényi, Antal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) who have not responded to two adequate treatments with antidepressants (TRD) are still unclear. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of add-on repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) compared with standard treatment. METHODS: A Markov-model simulated clinical events over one year from the perspective of healthcare payer. Third- and fourth-line treatment pathways (augmentation, antidepressant switch or combination, and Electro-Convulsive Therapy (ECT)) were defined based on medical practice guidelines. Transition probabilities were derived from a recent meta-analysis and scientific publications. Resource utilization and cost estimates were based on the patient-level database of a large university hospital. RESULTS: Incremental Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) and costs were 0.053 and 785 €, respectively, corresponding to an Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of 14,670 € per QALY. The difference in cost between standard treatment and rTMS is explained by the rTMS sessions used in acute (€660) and maintenance (€57/month) treatments, partly offset by lower hospital costs due to higher remission rates in the rTMS arm. Key parameters driving the ICER were incremental utility of remission, unit cost of rTMS treatment and remission rate. At a threshold of €22,243 add-on rTMS is a cost-effective alternative to pharmacotherapy. Evidence on long-term effectiveness is not yet available, so results are estimated for a one-year period. CONCLUSION: Not only does rTMS treatment have beneficial clinical effects compared with drug therapy in TRD, but it also appears to offer good value-for-money, especially in centres with larger numbers of patients where unit costs can be kept low. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-022-04078-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9238085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92380852022-06-29 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be a cost-effective alternative to antidepressant therapy after two treatment failures in patients with major depressive disorder Zemplényi, Antal Józwiak-Hagymásy, Judit Kovács, Sándor Erdősi, Dalma Boncz, Imre Tényi, Tamás Osváth, Péter Voros, Viktor BMC Psychiatry Research BACKGROUND: The cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) who have not responded to two adequate treatments with antidepressants (TRD) are still unclear. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of add-on repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) compared with standard treatment. METHODS: A Markov-model simulated clinical events over one year from the perspective of healthcare payer. Third- and fourth-line treatment pathways (augmentation, antidepressant switch or combination, and Electro-Convulsive Therapy (ECT)) were defined based on medical practice guidelines. Transition probabilities were derived from a recent meta-analysis and scientific publications. Resource utilization and cost estimates were based on the patient-level database of a large university hospital. RESULTS: Incremental Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) and costs were 0.053 and 785 €, respectively, corresponding to an Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of 14,670 € per QALY. The difference in cost between standard treatment and rTMS is explained by the rTMS sessions used in acute (€660) and maintenance (€57/month) treatments, partly offset by lower hospital costs due to higher remission rates in the rTMS arm. Key parameters driving the ICER were incremental utility of remission, unit cost of rTMS treatment and remission rate. At a threshold of €22,243 add-on rTMS is a cost-effective alternative to pharmacotherapy. Evidence on long-term effectiveness is not yet available, so results are estimated for a one-year period. CONCLUSION: Not only does rTMS treatment have beneficial clinical effects compared with drug therapy in TRD, but it also appears to offer good value-for-money, especially in centres with larger numbers of patients where unit costs can be kept low. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-022-04078-9. BioMed Central 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9238085/ /pubmed/35764989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04078-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zemplényi, Antal
Józwiak-Hagymásy, Judit
Kovács, Sándor
Erdősi, Dalma
Boncz, Imre
Tényi, Tamás
Osváth, Péter
Voros, Viktor
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be a cost-effective alternative to antidepressant therapy after two treatment failures in patients with major depressive disorder
title Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be a cost-effective alternative to antidepressant therapy after two treatment failures in patients with major depressive disorder
title_full Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be a cost-effective alternative to antidepressant therapy after two treatment failures in patients with major depressive disorder
title_fullStr Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be a cost-effective alternative to antidepressant therapy after two treatment failures in patients with major depressive disorder
title_full_unstemmed Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be a cost-effective alternative to antidepressant therapy after two treatment failures in patients with major depressive disorder
title_short Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be a cost-effective alternative to antidepressant therapy after two treatment failures in patients with major depressive disorder
title_sort repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be a cost-effective alternative to antidepressant therapy after two treatment failures in patients with major depressive disorder
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35764989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04078-9
work_keys_str_mv AT zemplenyiantal repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationmaybeacosteffectivealternativetoantidepressanttherapyaftertwotreatmentfailuresinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorder
AT jozwiakhagymasyjudit repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationmaybeacosteffectivealternativetoantidepressanttherapyaftertwotreatmentfailuresinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorder
AT kovacssandor repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationmaybeacosteffectivealternativetoantidepressanttherapyaftertwotreatmentfailuresinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorder
AT erdosidalma repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationmaybeacosteffectivealternativetoantidepressanttherapyaftertwotreatmentfailuresinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorder
AT bonczimre repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationmaybeacosteffectivealternativetoantidepressanttherapyaftertwotreatmentfailuresinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorder
AT tenyitamas repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationmaybeacosteffectivealternativetoantidepressanttherapyaftertwotreatmentfailuresinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorder
AT osvathpeter repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationmaybeacosteffectivealternativetoantidepressanttherapyaftertwotreatmentfailuresinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorder
AT vorosviktor repetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationmaybeacosteffectivealternativetoantidepressanttherapyaftertwotreatmentfailuresinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorder