Cargando…

A Comparative Analysis of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Terms of Their Oncological Efficacy in Resection: A Systematic Review

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is considered the standard procedure for surgical resection in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is still lingering speculation on its adequacy of lymph node (LN) dissection or sampling and the long-term survival benefits when compared to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nath, Tuheen S, Mohamed, Nida, Gill, Paramjot K, Khan, Safeera
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35774656
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25443
_version_ 1784736956115058688
author Nath, Tuheen S
Mohamed, Nida
Gill, Paramjot K
Khan, Safeera
author_facet Nath, Tuheen S
Mohamed, Nida
Gill, Paramjot K
Khan, Safeera
author_sort Nath, Tuheen S
collection PubMed
description Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is considered the standard procedure for surgical resection in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is still lingering speculation on its adequacy of lymph node (LN) dissection or sampling and the long-term survival benefits when compared to open thoracotomy. Given the above, we conducted a systematic review comparing VATS and thoracotomy in terms of their oncological effectiveness in resection. We explored major research literature databases and search engines such as MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate to find pertinent articles. After the meticulous screening, quality check, and applying relevant filters according to our eligibility criteria, we identified 16 studies relevant to our research question, out of which one was a randomized controlled trial, one meta-analysis, and 14 were observational studies. The study comprised 44,673 patients with NSCLC, out of whom 15,093 patients were operated by VATS and the remaining 29,580 patients by thoracotomy. The results indicate that VATS is equivalent to thoracotomy in total LNs (N1 + N2) and LN stations dissected. However, a thoracotomy may achieve slightly better mediastinal lymph node dissection (N2) in terms of assessing a greater number of mediastinal lymph nodes and nodal stations. This may be attributed to a better visual field during mediastinal nodal clearance by an open approach. Also, nodal upstaging was consistently more common with an open approach. In terms of long-term outcomes, both overall survival and disease-free survival rates were similar between the two groups, with VATS offering a slightly better survival benefit. Irrespective of the increased rates of nodal upstaging by an open approach, we conclude that VATS should be considered a highly efficient alternative to thoracotomy in both early and locally advanced NSCLC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9238107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92381072022-06-29 A Comparative Analysis of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Terms of Their Oncological Efficacy in Resection: A Systematic Review Nath, Tuheen S Mohamed, Nida Gill, Paramjot K Khan, Safeera Cureus Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is considered the standard procedure for surgical resection in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is still lingering speculation on its adequacy of lymph node (LN) dissection or sampling and the long-term survival benefits when compared to open thoracotomy. Given the above, we conducted a systematic review comparing VATS and thoracotomy in terms of their oncological effectiveness in resection. We explored major research literature databases and search engines such as MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate to find pertinent articles. After the meticulous screening, quality check, and applying relevant filters according to our eligibility criteria, we identified 16 studies relevant to our research question, out of which one was a randomized controlled trial, one meta-analysis, and 14 were observational studies. The study comprised 44,673 patients with NSCLC, out of whom 15,093 patients were operated by VATS and the remaining 29,580 patients by thoracotomy. The results indicate that VATS is equivalent to thoracotomy in total LNs (N1 + N2) and LN stations dissected. However, a thoracotomy may achieve slightly better mediastinal lymph node dissection (N2) in terms of assessing a greater number of mediastinal lymph nodes and nodal stations. This may be attributed to a better visual field during mediastinal nodal clearance by an open approach. Also, nodal upstaging was consistently more common with an open approach. In terms of long-term outcomes, both overall survival and disease-free survival rates were similar between the two groups, with VATS offering a slightly better survival benefit. Irrespective of the increased rates of nodal upstaging by an open approach, we conclude that VATS should be considered a highly efficient alternative to thoracotomy in both early and locally advanced NSCLC. Cureus 2022-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9238107/ /pubmed/35774656 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25443 Text en Copyright © 2022, Nath et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery
Nath, Tuheen S
Mohamed, Nida
Gill, Paramjot K
Khan, Safeera
A Comparative Analysis of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Terms of Their Oncological Efficacy in Resection: A Systematic Review
title A Comparative Analysis of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Terms of Their Oncological Efficacy in Resection: A Systematic Review
title_full A Comparative Analysis of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Terms of Their Oncological Efficacy in Resection: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr A Comparative Analysis of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Terms of Their Oncological Efficacy in Resection: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Analysis of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Terms of Their Oncological Efficacy in Resection: A Systematic Review
title_short A Comparative Analysis of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Terms of Their Oncological Efficacy in Resection: A Systematic Review
title_sort comparative analysis of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and thoracotomy in non-small-cell lung cancer in terms of their oncological efficacy in resection: a systematic review
topic Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35774656
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25443
work_keys_str_mv AT nathtuheens acomparativeanalysisofvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryandthoracotomyinnonsmallcelllungcancerintermsoftheironcologicalefficacyinresectionasystematicreview
AT mohamednida acomparativeanalysisofvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryandthoracotomyinnonsmallcelllungcancerintermsoftheironcologicalefficacyinresectionasystematicreview
AT gillparamjotk acomparativeanalysisofvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryandthoracotomyinnonsmallcelllungcancerintermsoftheironcologicalefficacyinresectionasystematicreview
AT khansafeera acomparativeanalysisofvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryandthoracotomyinnonsmallcelllungcancerintermsoftheironcologicalefficacyinresectionasystematicreview
AT nathtuheens comparativeanalysisofvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryandthoracotomyinnonsmallcelllungcancerintermsoftheironcologicalefficacyinresectionasystematicreview
AT mohamednida comparativeanalysisofvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryandthoracotomyinnonsmallcelllungcancerintermsoftheironcologicalefficacyinresectionasystematicreview
AT gillparamjotk comparativeanalysisofvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryandthoracotomyinnonsmallcelllungcancerintermsoftheironcologicalefficacyinresectionasystematicreview
AT khansafeera comparativeanalysisofvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryandthoracotomyinnonsmallcelllungcancerintermsoftheironcologicalefficacyinresectionasystematicreview