Cargando…
A Comparative Analysis of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Terms of Their Oncological Efficacy in Resection: A Systematic Review
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is considered the standard procedure for surgical resection in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is still lingering speculation on its adequacy of lymph node (LN) dissection or sampling and the long-term survival benefits when compared to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35774656 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25443 |
_version_ | 1784736956115058688 |
---|---|
author | Nath, Tuheen S Mohamed, Nida Gill, Paramjot K Khan, Safeera |
author_facet | Nath, Tuheen S Mohamed, Nida Gill, Paramjot K Khan, Safeera |
author_sort | Nath, Tuheen S |
collection | PubMed |
description | Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is considered the standard procedure for surgical resection in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is still lingering speculation on its adequacy of lymph node (LN) dissection or sampling and the long-term survival benefits when compared to open thoracotomy. Given the above, we conducted a systematic review comparing VATS and thoracotomy in terms of their oncological effectiveness in resection. We explored major research literature databases and search engines such as MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate to find pertinent articles. After the meticulous screening, quality check, and applying relevant filters according to our eligibility criteria, we identified 16 studies relevant to our research question, out of which one was a randomized controlled trial, one meta-analysis, and 14 were observational studies. The study comprised 44,673 patients with NSCLC, out of whom 15,093 patients were operated by VATS and the remaining 29,580 patients by thoracotomy. The results indicate that VATS is equivalent to thoracotomy in total LNs (N1 + N2) and LN stations dissected. However, a thoracotomy may achieve slightly better mediastinal lymph node dissection (N2) in terms of assessing a greater number of mediastinal lymph nodes and nodal stations. This may be attributed to a better visual field during mediastinal nodal clearance by an open approach. Also, nodal upstaging was consistently more common with an open approach. In terms of long-term outcomes, both overall survival and disease-free survival rates were similar between the two groups, with VATS offering a slightly better survival benefit. Irrespective of the increased rates of nodal upstaging by an open approach, we conclude that VATS should be considered a highly efficient alternative to thoracotomy in both early and locally advanced NSCLC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9238107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92381072022-06-29 A Comparative Analysis of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Terms of Their Oncological Efficacy in Resection: A Systematic Review Nath, Tuheen S Mohamed, Nida Gill, Paramjot K Khan, Safeera Cureus Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is considered the standard procedure for surgical resection in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is still lingering speculation on its adequacy of lymph node (LN) dissection or sampling and the long-term survival benefits when compared to open thoracotomy. Given the above, we conducted a systematic review comparing VATS and thoracotomy in terms of their oncological effectiveness in resection. We explored major research literature databases and search engines such as MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate to find pertinent articles. After the meticulous screening, quality check, and applying relevant filters according to our eligibility criteria, we identified 16 studies relevant to our research question, out of which one was a randomized controlled trial, one meta-analysis, and 14 were observational studies. The study comprised 44,673 patients with NSCLC, out of whom 15,093 patients were operated by VATS and the remaining 29,580 patients by thoracotomy. The results indicate that VATS is equivalent to thoracotomy in total LNs (N1 + N2) and LN stations dissected. However, a thoracotomy may achieve slightly better mediastinal lymph node dissection (N2) in terms of assessing a greater number of mediastinal lymph nodes and nodal stations. This may be attributed to a better visual field during mediastinal nodal clearance by an open approach. Also, nodal upstaging was consistently more common with an open approach. In terms of long-term outcomes, both overall survival and disease-free survival rates were similar between the two groups, with VATS offering a slightly better survival benefit. Irrespective of the increased rates of nodal upstaging by an open approach, we conclude that VATS should be considered a highly efficient alternative to thoracotomy in both early and locally advanced NSCLC. Cureus 2022-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9238107/ /pubmed/35774656 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25443 Text en Copyright © 2022, Nath et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery Nath, Tuheen S Mohamed, Nida Gill, Paramjot K Khan, Safeera A Comparative Analysis of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Terms of Their Oncological Efficacy in Resection: A Systematic Review |
title | A Comparative Analysis of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Terms of Their Oncological Efficacy in Resection: A Systematic Review |
title_full | A Comparative Analysis of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Terms of Their Oncological Efficacy in Resection: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Analysis of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Terms of Their Oncological Efficacy in Resection: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Analysis of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Terms of Their Oncological Efficacy in Resection: A Systematic Review |
title_short | A Comparative Analysis of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Terms of Their Oncological Efficacy in Resection: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | comparative analysis of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and thoracotomy in non-small-cell lung cancer in terms of their oncological efficacy in resection: a systematic review |
topic | Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35774656 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25443 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nathtuheens acomparativeanalysisofvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryandthoracotomyinnonsmallcelllungcancerintermsoftheironcologicalefficacyinresectionasystematicreview AT mohamednida acomparativeanalysisofvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryandthoracotomyinnonsmallcelllungcancerintermsoftheironcologicalefficacyinresectionasystematicreview AT gillparamjotk acomparativeanalysisofvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryandthoracotomyinnonsmallcelllungcancerintermsoftheironcologicalefficacyinresectionasystematicreview AT khansafeera acomparativeanalysisofvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryandthoracotomyinnonsmallcelllungcancerintermsoftheironcologicalefficacyinresectionasystematicreview AT nathtuheens comparativeanalysisofvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryandthoracotomyinnonsmallcelllungcancerintermsoftheironcologicalefficacyinresectionasystematicreview AT mohamednida comparativeanalysisofvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryandthoracotomyinnonsmallcelllungcancerintermsoftheironcologicalefficacyinresectionasystematicreview AT gillparamjotk comparativeanalysisofvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryandthoracotomyinnonsmallcelllungcancerintermsoftheironcologicalefficacyinresectionasystematicreview AT khansafeera comparativeanalysisofvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryandthoracotomyinnonsmallcelllungcancerintermsoftheironcologicalefficacyinresectionasystematicreview |