Cargando…

Comparison and optimization of sheep in vivo intervertebral disc injury model

BACKGROUND: The current standard of care for intervertebral disc (IVD) herniation, surgical discectomy, does not repair annulus fibrosus (AF) defects, which is partly due to the lack of effective methods to do so and is why new repair strategies are widely investigated and tested preclinically. Ther...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Constant, Caroline, Hom, Warren W., Nehrbass, Dirk, Carmel, Eric‐Norman, Albers, Christoph E., Deml, Moritz C., Gehweiler, Dominic, Lee, Yunsoo, Hecht, Andrew, Grad, Sibylle, Iatridis, James C., Zeiter, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35783908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsp2.1198
_version_ 1784737012149911552
author Constant, Caroline
Hom, Warren W.
Nehrbass, Dirk
Carmel, Eric‐Norman
Albers, Christoph E.
Deml, Moritz C.
Gehweiler, Dominic
Lee, Yunsoo
Hecht, Andrew
Grad, Sibylle
Iatridis, James C.
Zeiter, Stephan
author_facet Constant, Caroline
Hom, Warren W.
Nehrbass, Dirk
Carmel, Eric‐Norman
Albers, Christoph E.
Deml, Moritz C.
Gehweiler, Dominic
Lee, Yunsoo
Hecht, Andrew
Grad, Sibylle
Iatridis, James C.
Zeiter, Stephan
author_sort Constant, Caroline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The current standard of care for intervertebral disc (IVD) herniation, surgical discectomy, does not repair annulus fibrosus (AF) defects, which is partly due to the lack of effective methods to do so and is why new repair strategies are widely investigated and tested preclinically. There is a need to develop a standardized IVD injury model in large animals to enable comparison and interpretation across preclinical study results. The purpose of this study was to compare in vivo IVD injury models in sheep to determine which annulus fibrosus (AF) defect type combined with partial nucleus pulposus (NP) removal would better mimic degenerative human spinal pathologies. METHODS: Six skeletally mature sheep were randomly assigned to one of the two observation periods (1 and 3 months) and underwent creation of 3 different AF defect types (slit, cruciate, and box‐cut AF defects) in conjunction with 0.1 g NP removal in three lumbar levels using a lateral retroperitoneal surgical approach. The spine was monitored by clinical CT scans pre‐ and postoperatively, at 2 weeks and euthanasia, and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histology after euthanasia to determine the severity of degeneration (disc height loss, Pfirrmann grading, semiquantitative histopathology grading). RESULTS: All AF defects led to significant degenerative changes detectable on CT and MR images, produced bulging of disc tissue without disc herniation and led to degenerative and inflammatory histopathological changes. However, AF defects were not equal in terms of disc height loss at 3 months postoperatively; the cruciate and box‐cut AF defects showed significantly decreased disc height compared to their preoperative height, with the box‐cut defect creating the greatest disc height loss, while the slit AF defect showed restoration of normal preoperative disc height. CONCLUSIONS: The tested IVD injury models do not all generate comparable disc degeneration but can be considered suitable IVD injury models to investigate new treatments. Results of the current study clearly indicate that slit AF defect should be avoided if disc height is used as one of the main outcomes; additional confirmatory studies may be warranted to generalize this finding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9238284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92382842022-06-30 Comparison and optimization of sheep in vivo intervertebral disc injury model Constant, Caroline Hom, Warren W. Nehrbass, Dirk Carmel, Eric‐Norman Albers, Christoph E. Deml, Moritz C. Gehweiler, Dominic Lee, Yunsoo Hecht, Andrew Grad, Sibylle Iatridis, James C. Zeiter, Stephan JOR Spine Research Articles BACKGROUND: The current standard of care for intervertebral disc (IVD) herniation, surgical discectomy, does not repair annulus fibrosus (AF) defects, which is partly due to the lack of effective methods to do so and is why new repair strategies are widely investigated and tested preclinically. There is a need to develop a standardized IVD injury model in large animals to enable comparison and interpretation across preclinical study results. The purpose of this study was to compare in vivo IVD injury models in sheep to determine which annulus fibrosus (AF) defect type combined with partial nucleus pulposus (NP) removal would better mimic degenerative human spinal pathologies. METHODS: Six skeletally mature sheep were randomly assigned to one of the two observation periods (1 and 3 months) and underwent creation of 3 different AF defect types (slit, cruciate, and box‐cut AF defects) in conjunction with 0.1 g NP removal in three lumbar levels using a lateral retroperitoneal surgical approach. The spine was monitored by clinical CT scans pre‐ and postoperatively, at 2 weeks and euthanasia, and by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histology after euthanasia to determine the severity of degeneration (disc height loss, Pfirrmann grading, semiquantitative histopathology grading). RESULTS: All AF defects led to significant degenerative changes detectable on CT and MR images, produced bulging of disc tissue without disc herniation and led to degenerative and inflammatory histopathological changes. However, AF defects were not equal in terms of disc height loss at 3 months postoperatively; the cruciate and box‐cut AF defects showed significantly decreased disc height compared to their preoperative height, with the box‐cut defect creating the greatest disc height loss, while the slit AF defect showed restoration of normal preoperative disc height. CONCLUSIONS: The tested IVD injury models do not all generate comparable disc degeneration but can be considered suitable IVD injury models to investigate new treatments. Results of the current study clearly indicate that slit AF defect should be avoided if disc height is used as one of the main outcomes; additional confirmatory studies may be warranted to generalize this finding. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9238284/ /pubmed/35783908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsp2.1198 Text en © 2022 The Authors. JOR Spine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Constant, Caroline
Hom, Warren W.
Nehrbass, Dirk
Carmel, Eric‐Norman
Albers, Christoph E.
Deml, Moritz C.
Gehweiler, Dominic
Lee, Yunsoo
Hecht, Andrew
Grad, Sibylle
Iatridis, James C.
Zeiter, Stephan
Comparison and optimization of sheep in vivo intervertebral disc injury model
title Comparison and optimization of sheep in vivo intervertebral disc injury model
title_full Comparison and optimization of sheep in vivo intervertebral disc injury model
title_fullStr Comparison and optimization of sheep in vivo intervertebral disc injury model
title_full_unstemmed Comparison and optimization of sheep in vivo intervertebral disc injury model
title_short Comparison and optimization of sheep in vivo intervertebral disc injury model
title_sort comparison and optimization of sheep in vivo intervertebral disc injury model
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35783908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsp2.1198
work_keys_str_mv AT constantcaroline comparisonandoptimizationofsheepinvivointervertebraldiscinjurymodel
AT homwarrenw comparisonandoptimizationofsheepinvivointervertebraldiscinjurymodel
AT nehrbassdirk comparisonandoptimizationofsheepinvivointervertebraldiscinjurymodel
AT carmelericnorman comparisonandoptimizationofsheepinvivointervertebraldiscinjurymodel
AT alberschristophe comparisonandoptimizationofsheepinvivointervertebraldiscinjurymodel
AT demlmoritzc comparisonandoptimizationofsheepinvivointervertebraldiscinjurymodel
AT gehweilerdominic comparisonandoptimizationofsheepinvivointervertebraldiscinjurymodel
AT leeyunsoo comparisonandoptimizationofsheepinvivointervertebraldiscinjurymodel
AT hechtandrew comparisonandoptimizationofsheepinvivointervertebraldiscinjurymodel
AT gradsibylle comparisonandoptimizationofsheepinvivointervertebraldiscinjurymodel
AT iatridisjamesc comparisonandoptimizationofsheepinvivointervertebraldiscinjurymodel
AT zeiterstephan comparisonandoptimizationofsheepinvivointervertebraldiscinjurymodel