Cargando…

Pituitary suppression with a GnRHa short protocol in an alternate day schedule associated with rhCG microdoses

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a comfortable short protocol with GnRH agonist (GnRHa) in alternate days, with a step down method of gonadotropins administration associated with hCG microdose for young patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. METHODS: This study evaluated 89 ICSI cycles performe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodrigues, Rosane S., Setti, Amanda S., Braga, Daniela P.A.F., Valente, Fernanda M., Iaconelli Jr., Assumpto, Borges Jr, Edson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35761733
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20140011
_version_ 1784737035533156352
author Rodrigues, Rosane S.
Setti, Amanda S.
Braga, Daniela P.A.F.
Valente, Fernanda M.
Iaconelli Jr., Assumpto
Borges Jr, Edson
author_facet Rodrigues, Rosane S.
Setti, Amanda S.
Braga, Daniela P.A.F.
Valente, Fernanda M.
Iaconelli Jr., Assumpto
Borges Jr, Edson
author_sort Rodrigues, Rosane S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a comfortable short protocol with GnRH agonist (GnRHa) in alternate days, with a step down method of gonadotropins administration associated with hCG microdose for young patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. METHODS: This study evaluated 89 ICSI cycles performed in female patients aged <36 years. Patients were submitted to a short protocol with GnRHa schedule in the study group (n= 25) and to a long pituitary suppression protocol in the control group (n=64). RESULTS: The total dose of rFSH administered as well as estradiol levels on the day of hCG trigger were significantly lower in the short protocol group. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding the fertilization, high-quality embryos, implantation, pregnancy and miscarriage rates. However, mean ovarian stimulation cost (GnRHa short group: $2,397 ± $870.3 and control group: $3,197 ± $658.9, P <0.001) and mean ovarian stimulation cost per pregnancy (GnRHa short group: ($4,993 ± $1,813 and control group: $9,743 ± $2,008, P <0.001) were significantly lower in the GnRHa short group as compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: In patients with normal ovarian response, pituitary suppression with a GnRHa short protocol in alternate days is less costly, requires lower gonadotropins doses and results in similar implantation and pregnancy rates as compared to a GnRHa long protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9238370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92383702022-06-30 Pituitary suppression with a GnRHa short protocol in an alternate day schedule associated with rhCG microdoses Rodrigues, Rosane S. Setti, Amanda S. Braga, Daniela P.A.F. Valente, Fernanda M. Iaconelli Jr., Assumpto Borges Jr, Edson JBRA Assist Reprod Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a comfortable short protocol with GnRH agonist (GnRHa) in alternate days, with a step down method of gonadotropins administration associated with hCG microdose for young patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. METHODS: This study evaluated 89 ICSI cycles performed in female patients aged <36 years. Patients were submitted to a short protocol with GnRHa schedule in the study group (n= 25) and to a long pituitary suppression protocol in the control group (n=64). RESULTS: The total dose of rFSH administered as well as estradiol levels on the day of hCG trigger were significantly lower in the short protocol group. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding the fertilization, high-quality embryos, implantation, pregnancy and miscarriage rates. However, mean ovarian stimulation cost (GnRHa short group: $2,397 ± $870.3 and control group: $3,197 ± $658.9, P <0.001) and mean ovarian stimulation cost per pregnancy (GnRHa short group: ($4,993 ± $1,813 and control group: $9,743 ± $2,008, P <0.001) were significantly lower in the GnRHa short group as compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: In patients with normal ovarian response, pituitary suppression with a GnRHa short protocol in alternate days is less costly, requires lower gonadotropins doses and results in similar implantation and pregnancy rates as compared to a GnRHa long protocol. Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC9238370/ /pubmed/35761733 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20140011 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rodrigues, Rosane S.
Setti, Amanda S.
Braga, Daniela P.A.F.
Valente, Fernanda M.
Iaconelli Jr., Assumpto
Borges Jr, Edson
Pituitary suppression with a GnRHa short protocol in an alternate day schedule associated with rhCG microdoses
title Pituitary suppression with a GnRHa short protocol in an alternate day schedule associated with rhCG microdoses
title_full Pituitary suppression with a GnRHa short protocol in an alternate day schedule associated with rhCG microdoses
title_fullStr Pituitary suppression with a GnRHa short protocol in an alternate day schedule associated with rhCG microdoses
title_full_unstemmed Pituitary suppression with a GnRHa short protocol in an alternate day schedule associated with rhCG microdoses
title_short Pituitary suppression with a GnRHa short protocol in an alternate day schedule associated with rhCG microdoses
title_sort pituitary suppression with a gnrha short protocol in an alternate day schedule associated with rhcg microdoses
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35761733
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20140011
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguesrosanes pituitarysuppressionwithagnrhashortprotocolinanalternatedayscheduleassociatedwithrhcgmicrodoses
AT settiamandas pituitarysuppressionwithagnrhashortprotocolinanalternatedayscheduleassociatedwithrhcgmicrodoses
AT bragadanielapaf pituitarysuppressionwithagnrhashortprotocolinanalternatedayscheduleassociatedwithrhcgmicrodoses
AT valentefernandam pituitarysuppressionwithagnrhashortprotocolinanalternatedayscheduleassociatedwithrhcgmicrodoses
AT iaconellijrassumpto pituitarysuppressionwithagnrhashortprotocolinanalternatedayscheduleassociatedwithrhcgmicrodoses
AT borgesjredson pituitarysuppressionwithagnrhashortprotocolinanalternatedayscheduleassociatedwithrhcgmicrodoses