Cargando…

Characterization of extracellular vesicles isolated from different liquid biopsies of uveal melanoma patients

PURPOSE: Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular malignant tumor in adults. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been extensively studied as a biomarker to monitor disease in patients. The study of new biomarkers in melanoma patients could prevent metastasis by earlier diagnosis. In this stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pessuti, Carmen Luz, Costa, Deise Fialho, Ribeiro, Kleber S., Abdouh, Mohamed, Tsering, Thupten, Nascimento, Heloisa, Commodaro, Alessandra G., Marcos, Allexya Affonso Antunes, Torrecilhas, Ana Claudia, Belfort, Rubens N., Belfort, Rubens, Burnier, Julia Valdemarin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AboutScience 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35784590
http://dx.doi.org/10.33393/jcb.2022.2370
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular malignant tumor in adults. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been extensively studied as a biomarker to monitor disease in patients. The study of new biomarkers in melanoma patients could prevent metastasis by earlier diagnosis. In this study, we determined the proteomic profile of EVs isolated from aqueous humor (AH), vitreous humor (VH), and plasma from UM patients in comparison with cancer-free control patients. METHODS: AH, VH and plasma were collected from seven patients with UM after enucleation; AH and plasma were collected from seven cancer-free patients with cataract (CAT; control group). EVs were isolated using the membrane-based affinity binding column method. Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) was performed to determine the size and concentration of EVs. EV markers, CD63 and TSG101, were assessed by immunoblotting, and the EV proteome was characterized by mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Mean EV concentration was higher in all analytes of UM patients compared to those in the CAT group. In the UM cohort, the mean concentration of EVs was significantly lower in AH and plasma than in VH. In contrast, the mean size and size distribution of EVs was invariably identical in all analyzed analytes and in both studied groups (UM vs. CAT). Mass spectrometry analyses from the different analytes from UM patients showed the presence of EV markers. CONCLUSION: EVs isolated from AH, VH, and plasma from patients with UM showed consistent profiles and support the use of blood to monitor UM patients as a noninvasive liquid biopsy.