Serial, Repeated, or Single Measurements of Natriuretic Peptides (BNP or NT‐proBNP) in Estimating Cardiovascular Risk: Is It the “Importance of Change Over Time” or “The Past Is Good, But the Present Is Better,” or Both, in Clinical Context?

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Miller, Wayne L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Original Research
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35383469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.025294
_version_ 1784737050431324160
author Miller, Wayne L.
author_facet Miller, Wayne L.
author_sort Miller, Wayne L.
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9238445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92384452022-06-30 Serial, Repeated, or Single Measurements of Natriuretic Peptides (BNP or NT‐proBNP) in Estimating Cardiovascular Risk: Is It the “Importance of Change Over Time” or “The Past Is Good, But the Present Is Better,” or Both, in Clinical Context? Miller, Wayne L. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9238445/ /pubmed/35383469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.025294 Text en © 2022 The Author. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Miller, Wayne L.
Serial, Repeated, or Single Measurements of Natriuretic Peptides (BNP or NT‐proBNP) in Estimating Cardiovascular Risk: Is It the “Importance of Change Over Time” or “The Past Is Good, But the Present Is Better,” or Both, in Clinical Context?
title Serial, Repeated, or Single Measurements of Natriuretic Peptides (BNP or NT‐proBNP) in Estimating Cardiovascular Risk: Is It the “Importance of Change Over Time” or “The Past Is Good, But the Present Is Better,” or Both, in Clinical Context?
title_full Serial, Repeated, or Single Measurements of Natriuretic Peptides (BNP or NT‐proBNP) in Estimating Cardiovascular Risk: Is It the “Importance of Change Over Time” or “The Past Is Good, But the Present Is Better,” or Both, in Clinical Context?
title_fullStr Serial, Repeated, or Single Measurements of Natriuretic Peptides (BNP or NT‐proBNP) in Estimating Cardiovascular Risk: Is It the “Importance of Change Over Time” or “The Past Is Good, But the Present Is Better,” or Both, in Clinical Context?
title_full_unstemmed Serial, Repeated, or Single Measurements of Natriuretic Peptides (BNP or NT‐proBNP) in Estimating Cardiovascular Risk: Is It the “Importance of Change Over Time” or “The Past Is Good, But the Present Is Better,” or Both, in Clinical Context?
title_short Serial, Repeated, or Single Measurements of Natriuretic Peptides (BNP or NT‐proBNP) in Estimating Cardiovascular Risk: Is It the “Importance of Change Over Time” or “The Past Is Good, But the Present Is Better,” or Both, in Clinical Context?
title_sort serial, repeated, or single measurements of natriuretic peptides (bnp or nt‐probnp) in estimating cardiovascular risk: is it the “importance of change over time” or “the past is good, but the present is better,” or both, in clinical context?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35383469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.025294
work_keys_str_mv AT millerwaynel serialrepeatedorsinglemeasurementsofnatriureticpeptidesbnporntprobnpinestimatingcardiovascularriskisittheimportanceofchangeovertimeorthepastisgoodbutthepresentisbetterorbothinclinicalcontext

Ejemplares similares