Cargando…

Ajmaline‐Induced Abnormalities in Brugada Syndrome: Evaluation With ECG Imaging

BACKGROUND: The rate of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in Brugada syndrome (BrS) is ≈1%/y. Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging is a noninvasive mapping system that has a role in assessing BrS depolarization and repolarization abnormalities. This study aimed to analyze electrocardiographic imaging p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pannone, Luigi, Monaco, Cinzia, Sorgente, Antonio, Vergara, Pasquale, Calburean, Paul‐Adrian, Gauthey, Anaïs, Bisignani, Antonio, Kazawa, Shuichiro, Strazdas, Antanas, Mojica, Joerelle, Lipartiti, Felicia, Al Housari, Maysam, Miraglia, Vincenzo, Rizzi, Sergio, Sofianos, Dimitrios, Cecchini, Federico, Osório, Thiago Guimarães, Paparella, Gaetano, Ramak, Robbert, Overeinder, Ingrid, Bala, Gezim, Almorad, Alexandre, Ströker, Erwin, Pappaert, Gudrun, Sieira, Juan, Brugada, Pedro, La Meir, Mark, Chierchia, Gian‐Battista, de Asmundis, Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35023354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024001
_version_ 1784737069772308480
author Pannone, Luigi
Monaco, Cinzia
Sorgente, Antonio
Vergara, Pasquale
Calburean, Paul‐Adrian
Gauthey, Anaïs
Bisignani, Antonio
Kazawa, Shuichiro
Strazdas, Antanas
Mojica, Joerelle
Lipartiti, Felicia
Al Housari, Maysam
Miraglia, Vincenzo
Rizzi, Sergio
Sofianos, Dimitrios
Cecchini, Federico
Osório, Thiago Guimarães
Paparella, Gaetano
Ramak, Robbert
Overeinder, Ingrid
Bala, Gezim
Almorad, Alexandre
Ströker, Erwin
Pappaert, Gudrun
Sieira, Juan
Brugada, Pedro
La Meir, Mark
Chierchia, Gian‐Battista
de Asmundis, Carlo
author_facet Pannone, Luigi
Monaco, Cinzia
Sorgente, Antonio
Vergara, Pasquale
Calburean, Paul‐Adrian
Gauthey, Anaïs
Bisignani, Antonio
Kazawa, Shuichiro
Strazdas, Antanas
Mojica, Joerelle
Lipartiti, Felicia
Al Housari, Maysam
Miraglia, Vincenzo
Rizzi, Sergio
Sofianos, Dimitrios
Cecchini, Federico
Osório, Thiago Guimarães
Paparella, Gaetano
Ramak, Robbert
Overeinder, Ingrid
Bala, Gezim
Almorad, Alexandre
Ströker, Erwin
Pappaert, Gudrun
Sieira, Juan
Brugada, Pedro
La Meir, Mark
Chierchia, Gian‐Battista
de Asmundis, Carlo
author_sort Pannone, Luigi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The rate of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in Brugada syndrome (BrS) is ≈1%/y. Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging is a noninvasive mapping system that has a role in assessing BrS depolarization and repolarization abnormalities. This study aimed to analyze electrocardiographic imaging parameters during ajmaline test (AJT). METHODS AND RESULTS: All consecutive epicardial maps of the right ventricle outflow tract (RVOT‐EPI) in BrS with CardioInsight were retrospectively analyzed. (1) RVOT‐EPI activation time (RVOT‐AT); (2) RVOT‐EPI recovery time, and (3) RVOT‐EPI activation‐recovery interval (RVOT‐ARI) were calculated. ∆RVOT‐AT, ∆RVOT‐EPI recovery time, and ∆RVOT‐ARI were defined as the difference in parameters before and after AJT. SCD‐BrS patients were defined as individuals presenting a history of aborted SCD. Thirty‐nine patients with BrS were retrospectively analyzed and 12 patients (30.8%) were SCD‐BrS. After AJT, an increase in both RVOT‐AT [105.9 milliseconds versus 65.8 milliseconds, P<0.001] and RVOT‐EPI recovery time [403.4 milliseconds versus 365.7 milliseconds, P<0.001] was observed. No changes occurred in RVOT‐ARI [297.5 milliseconds versus 299.9 milliseconds, P=0.7]. Before AJT no differences were observed between SCD‐BrS and non SCD‐BrS in RVOT‐AT, RVOT‐EPI recovery time, and RVOT‐ARI (P=0.9, P=0.91, P=0.86, respectively). Following AJT, SCD‐BrS patients showed higher RVOT‐AT, higher ∆RVOT‐AT, lower RVOT‐ARI, and lower ∆RVOT‐ARI (P<0.001, P<0.001, P=0.007, P=0.002, respectively). At the univariate logistic regression, predictors of SCD‐BrS were the following: RVOT‐AT after AJT (specificity: 0.74, sensitivity 1.00, area under the curve 0.92); ∆RVOT‐AT (specificity: 0.74, sensitivity 0.92, area under the curve 0.86); RVOT‐ARI after AJT (specificity 0.96, sensitivity 0.58, area under the curve 0.79), and ∆RVOT‐ARI (specificity 0.85, sensitivity 0.67, area under the curve 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging can be useful in evaluating the results of AJT in BrS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9238512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92385122022-06-30 Ajmaline‐Induced Abnormalities in Brugada Syndrome: Evaluation With ECG Imaging Pannone, Luigi Monaco, Cinzia Sorgente, Antonio Vergara, Pasquale Calburean, Paul‐Adrian Gauthey, Anaïs Bisignani, Antonio Kazawa, Shuichiro Strazdas, Antanas Mojica, Joerelle Lipartiti, Felicia Al Housari, Maysam Miraglia, Vincenzo Rizzi, Sergio Sofianos, Dimitrios Cecchini, Federico Osório, Thiago Guimarães Paparella, Gaetano Ramak, Robbert Overeinder, Ingrid Bala, Gezim Almorad, Alexandre Ströker, Erwin Pappaert, Gudrun Sieira, Juan Brugada, Pedro La Meir, Mark Chierchia, Gian‐Battista de Asmundis, Carlo J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: The rate of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in Brugada syndrome (BrS) is ≈1%/y. Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging is a noninvasive mapping system that has a role in assessing BrS depolarization and repolarization abnormalities. This study aimed to analyze electrocardiographic imaging parameters during ajmaline test (AJT). METHODS AND RESULTS: All consecutive epicardial maps of the right ventricle outflow tract (RVOT‐EPI) in BrS with CardioInsight were retrospectively analyzed. (1) RVOT‐EPI activation time (RVOT‐AT); (2) RVOT‐EPI recovery time, and (3) RVOT‐EPI activation‐recovery interval (RVOT‐ARI) were calculated. ∆RVOT‐AT, ∆RVOT‐EPI recovery time, and ∆RVOT‐ARI were defined as the difference in parameters before and after AJT. SCD‐BrS patients were defined as individuals presenting a history of aborted SCD. Thirty‐nine patients with BrS were retrospectively analyzed and 12 patients (30.8%) were SCD‐BrS. After AJT, an increase in both RVOT‐AT [105.9 milliseconds versus 65.8 milliseconds, P<0.001] and RVOT‐EPI recovery time [403.4 milliseconds versus 365.7 milliseconds, P<0.001] was observed. No changes occurred in RVOT‐ARI [297.5 milliseconds versus 299.9 milliseconds, P=0.7]. Before AJT no differences were observed between SCD‐BrS and non SCD‐BrS in RVOT‐AT, RVOT‐EPI recovery time, and RVOT‐ARI (P=0.9, P=0.91, P=0.86, respectively). Following AJT, SCD‐BrS patients showed higher RVOT‐AT, higher ∆RVOT‐AT, lower RVOT‐ARI, and lower ∆RVOT‐ARI (P<0.001, P<0.001, P=0.007, P=0.002, respectively). At the univariate logistic regression, predictors of SCD‐BrS were the following: RVOT‐AT after AJT (specificity: 0.74, sensitivity 1.00, area under the curve 0.92); ∆RVOT‐AT (specificity: 0.74, sensitivity 0.92, area under the curve 0.86); RVOT‐ARI after AJT (specificity 0.96, sensitivity 0.58, area under the curve 0.79), and ∆RVOT‐ARI (specificity 0.85, sensitivity 0.67, area under the curve 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging can be useful in evaluating the results of AJT in BrS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9238512/ /pubmed/35023354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024001 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Pannone, Luigi
Monaco, Cinzia
Sorgente, Antonio
Vergara, Pasquale
Calburean, Paul‐Adrian
Gauthey, Anaïs
Bisignani, Antonio
Kazawa, Shuichiro
Strazdas, Antanas
Mojica, Joerelle
Lipartiti, Felicia
Al Housari, Maysam
Miraglia, Vincenzo
Rizzi, Sergio
Sofianos, Dimitrios
Cecchini, Federico
Osório, Thiago Guimarães
Paparella, Gaetano
Ramak, Robbert
Overeinder, Ingrid
Bala, Gezim
Almorad, Alexandre
Ströker, Erwin
Pappaert, Gudrun
Sieira, Juan
Brugada, Pedro
La Meir, Mark
Chierchia, Gian‐Battista
de Asmundis, Carlo
Ajmaline‐Induced Abnormalities in Brugada Syndrome: Evaluation With ECG Imaging
title Ajmaline‐Induced Abnormalities in Brugada Syndrome: Evaluation With ECG Imaging
title_full Ajmaline‐Induced Abnormalities in Brugada Syndrome: Evaluation With ECG Imaging
title_fullStr Ajmaline‐Induced Abnormalities in Brugada Syndrome: Evaluation With ECG Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Ajmaline‐Induced Abnormalities in Brugada Syndrome: Evaluation With ECG Imaging
title_short Ajmaline‐Induced Abnormalities in Brugada Syndrome: Evaluation With ECG Imaging
title_sort ajmaline‐induced abnormalities in brugada syndrome: evaluation with ecg imaging
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35023354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024001
work_keys_str_mv AT pannoneluigi ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT monacocinzia ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT sorgenteantonio ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT vergarapasquale ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT calbureanpauladrian ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT gautheyanais ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT bisignaniantonio ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT kazawashuichiro ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT strazdasantanas ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT mojicajoerelle ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT lipartitifelicia ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT alhousarimaysam ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT miragliavincenzo ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT rizzisergio ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT sofianosdimitrios ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT cecchinifederico ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT osoriothiagoguimaraes ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT paparellagaetano ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT ramakrobbert ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT overeinderingrid ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT balagezim ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT almoradalexandre ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT strokererwin ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT pappaertgudrun ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT sieirajuan ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT brugadapedro ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT lameirmark ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT chierchiagianbattista ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging
AT deasmundiscarlo ajmalineinducedabnormalitiesinbrugadasyndromeevaluationwithecgimaging