Cargando…

Acute Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Tandem Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

BACKGROUND: Despite thrombectomy having become the standard of care for large‐vessel occlusion strokes, acute endovascular management in tandem occlusions, especially of the cervical internal carotid artery lesion, remains uncertain. We aimed to compare efficacy and safety of acute carotid artery st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zevallos, Cynthia B., Farooqui, Mudassir, Quispe‐Orozco, Darko, Mendez‐Ruiz, Alan, Dajles, Andres, Garg, Aayushi, Galecio‐Castillo, Milagros, Patterson, Mary, Zaidat, Osama, Ortega‐Gutierrez, Santiago
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35023353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022335
_version_ 1784737075037208576
author Zevallos, Cynthia B.
Farooqui, Mudassir
Quispe‐Orozco, Darko
Mendez‐Ruiz, Alan
Dajles, Andres
Garg, Aayushi
Galecio‐Castillo, Milagros
Patterson, Mary
Zaidat, Osama
Ortega‐Gutierrez, Santiago
author_facet Zevallos, Cynthia B.
Farooqui, Mudassir
Quispe‐Orozco, Darko
Mendez‐Ruiz, Alan
Dajles, Andres
Garg, Aayushi
Galecio‐Castillo, Milagros
Patterson, Mary
Zaidat, Osama
Ortega‐Gutierrez, Santiago
author_sort Zevallos, Cynthia B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite thrombectomy having become the standard of care for large‐vessel occlusion strokes, acute endovascular management in tandem occlusions, especially of the cervical internal carotid artery lesion, remains uncertain. We aimed to compare efficacy and safety of acute carotid artery stenting to balloon angioplasty alone on treating the cervical lesion in tandem occlusions. Similarly, we aimed to explore those outcomes’ associations with technique approaches and use of thrombolysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to compare functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale), reperfusion, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 3‐month mortality. We explored the association of first approach (anterograde/retrograde) and use of thrombolysis with those outcomes as well. Two independent reviewers performed the screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. A random‐effects model was used for analysis. Thirty‐four studies were included in our systematic review and 9 in the meta‐analysis. Acute carotid artery stenting was associated with higher odds of modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 (odds ratio [OR], 1.95 [95% CI, 1.24–3.05]) and successful reperfusion (OR, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.26–2.83]), with no differences in mortality or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates. Moreover, a retrograde approach was significantly associated with modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 (OR, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.05–2.83]), and no differences were found on thrombolysis status. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid artery stenting and a retrograde approach had higher odds of successful reperfusion and good functional outcomes at 3 months than balloon angioplasty and an anterograde approach, respectively, in patients with tandem occlusions. A randomized controlled trial comparing these techniques with structured antithrombotic regimens and safety outcomes will offer definitive guidance in the optimal management of this complex disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9238531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92385312022-06-30 Acute Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Tandem Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Zevallos, Cynthia B. Farooqui, Mudassir Quispe‐Orozco, Darko Mendez‐Ruiz, Alan Dajles, Andres Garg, Aayushi Galecio‐Castillo, Milagros Patterson, Mary Zaidat, Osama Ortega‐Gutierrez, Santiago J Am Heart Assoc Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis BACKGROUND: Despite thrombectomy having become the standard of care for large‐vessel occlusion strokes, acute endovascular management in tandem occlusions, especially of the cervical internal carotid artery lesion, remains uncertain. We aimed to compare efficacy and safety of acute carotid artery stenting to balloon angioplasty alone on treating the cervical lesion in tandem occlusions. Similarly, we aimed to explore those outcomes’ associations with technique approaches and use of thrombolysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to compare functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale), reperfusion, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 3‐month mortality. We explored the association of first approach (anterograde/retrograde) and use of thrombolysis with those outcomes as well. Two independent reviewers performed the screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. A random‐effects model was used for analysis. Thirty‐four studies were included in our systematic review and 9 in the meta‐analysis. Acute carotid artery stenting was associated with higher odds of modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 (odds ratio [OR], 1.95 [95% CI, 1.24–3.05]) and successful reperfusion (OR, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.26–2.83]), with no differences in mortality or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates. Moreover, a retrograde approach was significantly associated with modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 (OR, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.05–2.83]), and no differences were found on thrombolysis status. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid artery stenting and a retrograde approach had higher odds of successful reperfusion and good functional outcomes at 3 months than balloon angioplasty and an anterograde approach, respectively, in patients with tandem occlusions. A randomized controlled trial comparing these techniques with structured antithrombotic regimens and safety outcomes will offer definitive guidance in the optimal management of this complex disease. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9238531/ /pubmed/35023353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022335 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
Zevallos, Cynthia B.
Farooqui, Mudassir
Quispe‐Orozco, Darko
Mendez‐Ruiz, Alan
Dajles, Andres
Garg, Aayushi
Galecio‐Castillo, Milagros
Patterson, Mary
Zaidat, Osama
Ortega‐Gutierrez, Santiago
Acute Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Tandem Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title Acute Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Tandem Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full Acute Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Tandem Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_fullStr Acute Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Tandem Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Acute Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Tandem Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_short Acute Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Tandem Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_sort acute carotid artery stenting versus balloon angioplasty for tandem occlusions: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35023353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022335
work_keys_str_mv AT zevalloscynthiab acutecarotidarterystentingversusballoonangioplastyfortandemocclusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT farooquimudassir acutecarotidarterystentingversusballoonangioplastyfortandemocclusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT quispeorozcodarko acutecarotidarterystentingversusballoonangioplastyfortandemocclusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mendezruizalan acutecarotidarterystentingversusballoonangioplastyfortandemocclusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dajlesandres acutecarotidarterystentingversusballoonangioplastyfortandemocclusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gargaayushi acutecarotidarterystentingversusballoonangioplastyfortandemocclusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT galeciocastillomilagros acutecarotidarterystentingversusballoonangioplastyfortandemocclusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pattersonmary acutecarotidarterystentingversusballoonangioplastyfortandemocclusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zaidatosama acutecarotidarterystentingversusballoonangioplastyfortandemocclusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ortegagutierrezsantiago acutecarotidarterystentingversusballoonangioplastyfortandemocclusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis