Cargando…
Stent Optimization Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Its Prognostic Implications After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
BACKGROUND: Stent underexpansion has been known to be associated with worse outcomes. We sought to define optical coherence tomography assessed optimal stent expansion index (SEI), which associates with lower incidence of follow‐up major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35470682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.023493 |
_version_ | 1784737095729807360 |
---|---|
author | Rai, Himanshu Harzer, Fiona Otsuka, Tatsuhiko Abdelwahed, Youssef S. Antuña, Paula Blachutzik, Florian Koppara, Tobias Räber, Lorenz Leistner, David M. Alfonso, Fernando Nef, Holger Seguchi, Masaru Aytekin, Alp Xhepa, Erion Kufner, Sebastian Cassese, Salvatore Laugwitz, Karl‐Ludwig Byrne, Robert A. Kastrati, Adnan Joner, Michael |
author_facet | Rai, Himanshu Harzer, Fiona Otsuka, Tatsuhiko Abdelwahed, Youssef S. Antuña, Paula Blachutzik, Florian Koppara, Tobias Räber, Lorenz Leistner, David M. Alfonso, Fernando Nef, Holger Seguchi, Masaru Aytekin, Alp Xhepa, Erion Kufner, Sebastian Cassese, Salvatore Laugwitz, Karl‐Ludwig Byrne, Robert A. Kastrati, Adnan Joner, Michael |
author_sort | Rai, Himanshu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Stent underexpansion has been known to be associated with worse outcomes. We sought to define optical coherence tomography assessed optimal stent expansion index (SEI), which associates with lower incidence of follow‐up major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 315 patients (involving 370 lesions) who underwent optical coherence tomography–aided coronary stenting were retrospectively included. SEI was calculated separately for equal halves of each stented segment using minimum stent area/mean reference lumen area ([proximal reference area+distal reference area]/2). The smaller of the 2 was considered to be the SEI of that case. Follow‐up MACE was defined as a composite of all‐cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization. Average minimum stent area was 6.02 (interquartile range, 4.65–7.92) mm(2), while SEI was 0.79 (interquartile range, 0.71–0.86). Forty‐seven (12.7%) incidences of MACE were recorded for 370 included lesions during a median follow‐up duration of 557 (interquartile range, 323–1103) days. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 0.85 as the best SEI cutoff (<0.85) to predict follow‐up MACE (area under the curve, 0.60; sensitivity, 0.85; specificity, 0.34). MACE was observed in 40 of 260 (15.4%) lesions with SEI <0.85 and in 7 of 110 (6.4%) lesions with SEI ≥0.85 (P=0.02). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression identified SEI <0.85 (odds ratio, 3.55; 95% CI, 1.40–9.05; P<0.01) and coronary calcification (odds ratio, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.00–6.10; P=0.05) as independent predictors of follow‐up MACE. CONCLUSIONS: The present study identified SEI <0.85, associated with increased incidence of MACE, as the optimal cutoff in daily practice. Along with suboptimal SEI (<0.85), coronary calcification was also found to be a significant predictor of follow‐up MACE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9238610 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92386102022-06-30 Stent Optimization Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Its Prognostic Implications After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Rai, Himanshu Harzer, Fiona Otsuka, Tatsuhiko Abdelwahed, Youssef S. Antuña, Paula Blachutzik, Florian Koppara, Tobias Räber, Lorenz Leistner, David M. Alfonso, Fernando Nef, Holger Seguchi, Masaru Aytekin, Alp Xhepa, Erion Kufner, Sebastian Cassese, Salvatore Laugwitz, Karl‐Ludwig Byrne, Robert A. Kastrati, Adnan Joner, Michael J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Stent underexpansion has been known to be associated with worse outcomes. We sought to define optical coherence tomography assessed optimal stent expansion index (SEI), which associates with lower incidence of follow‐up major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 315 patients (involving 370 lesions) who underwent optical coherence tomography–aided coronary stenting were retrospectively included. SEI was calculated separately for equal halves of each stented segment using minimum stent area/mean reference lumen area ([proximal reference area+distal reference area]/2). The smaller of the 2 was considered to be the SEI of that case. Follow‐up MACE was defined as a composite of all‐cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization. Average minimum stent area was 6.02 (interquartile range, 4.65–7.92) mm(2), while SEI was 0.79 (interquartile range, 0.71–0.86). Forty‐seven (12.7%) incidences of MACE were recorded for 370 included lesions during a median follow‐up duration of 557 (interquartile range, 323–1103) days. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 0.85 as the best SEI cutoff (<0.85) to predict follow‐up MACE (area under the curve, 0.60; sensitivity, 0.85; specificity, 0.34). MACE was observed in 40 of 260 (15.4%) lesions with SEI <0.85 and in 7 of 110 (6.4%) lesions with SEI ≥0.85 (P=0.02). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression identified SEI <0.85 (odds ratio, 3.55; 95% CI, 1.40–9.05; P<0.01) and coronary calcification (odds ratio, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.00–6.10; P=0.05) as independent predictors of follow‐up MACE. CONCLUSIONS: The present study identified SEI <0.85, associated with increased incidence of MACE, as the optimal cutoff in daily practice. Along with suboptimal SEI (<0.85), coronary calcification was also found to be a significant predictor of follow‐up MACE. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9238610/ /pubmed/35470682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.023493 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Rai, Himanshu Harzer, Fiona Otsuka, Tatsuhiko Abdelwahed, Youssef S. Antuña, Paula Blachutzik, Florian Koppara, Tobias Räber, Lorenz Leistner, David M. Alfonso, Fernando Nef, Holger Seguchi, Masaru Aytekin, Alp Xhepa, Erion Kufner, Sebastian Cassese, Salvatore Laugwitz, Karl‐Ludwig Byrne, Robert A. Kastrati, Adnan Joner, Michael Stent Optimization Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Its Prognostic Implications After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title | Stent Optimization Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Its Prognostic Implications After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title_full | Stent Optimization Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Its Prognostic Implications After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title_fullStr | Stent Optimization Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Its Prognostic Implications After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title_full_unstemmed | Stent Optimization Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Its Prognostic Implications After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title_short | Stent Optimization Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Its Prognostic Implications After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title_sort | stent optimization using optical coherence tomography and its prognostic implications after percutaneous coronary intervention |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35470682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.023493 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raihimanshu stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT harzerfiona stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT otsukatatsuhiko stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT abdelwahedyoussefs stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT antunapaula stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT blachutzikflorian stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT kopparatobias stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT raberlorenz stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT leistnerdavidm stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT alfonsofernando stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT nefholger stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT seguchimasaru stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT aytekinalp stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT xhepaerion stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT kufnersebastian stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT cassesesalvatore stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT laugwitzkarlludwig stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT byrneroberta stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT kastratiadnan stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT jonermichael stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention |