Cargando…

Stent Optimization Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Its Prognostic Implications After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND: Stent underexpansion has been known to be associated with worse outcomes. We sought to define optical coherence tomography assessed optimal stent expansion index (SEI), which associates with lower incidence of follow‐up major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rai, Himanshu, Harzer, Fiona, Otsuka, Tatsuhiko, Abdelwahed, Youssef S., Antuña, Paula, Blachutzik, Florian, Koppara, Tobias, Räber, Lorenz, Leistner, David M., Alfonso, Fernando, Nef, Holger, Seguchi, Masaru, Aytekin, Alp, Xhepa, Erion, Kufner, Sebastian, Cassese, Salvatore, Laugwitz, Karl‐Ludwig, Byrne, Robert A., Kastrati, Adnan, Joner, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35470682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.023493
_version_ 1784737095729807360
author Rai, Himanshu
Harzer, Fiona
Otsuka, Tatsuhiko
Abdelwahed, Youssef S.
Antuña, Paula
Blachutzik, Florian
Koppara, Tobias
Räber, Lorenz
Leistner, David M.
Alfonso, Fernando
Nef, Holger
Seguchi, Masaru
Aytekin, Alp
Xhepa, Erion
Kufner, Sebastian
Cassese, Salvatore
Laugwitz, Karl‐Ludwig
Byrne, Robert A.
Kastrati, Adnan
Joner, Michael
author_facet Rai, Himanshu
Harzer, Fiona
Otsuka, Tatsuhiko
Abdelwahed, Youssef S.
Antuña, Paula
Blachutzik, Florian
Koppara, Tobias
Räber, Lorenz
Leistner, David M.
Alfonso, Fernando
Nef, Holger
Seguchi, Masaru
Aytekin, Alp
Xhepa, Erion
Kufner, Sebastian
Cassese, Salvatore
Laugwitz, Karl‐Ludwig
Byrne, Robert A.
Kastrati, Adnan
Joner, Michael
author_sort Rai, Himanshu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stent underexpansion has been known to be associated with worse outcomes. We sought to define optical coherence tomography assessed optimal stent expansion index (SEI), which associates with lower incidence of follow‐up major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 315 patients (involving 370 lesions) who underwent optical coherence tomography–aided coronary stenting were retrospectively included. SEI was calculated separately for equal halves of each stented segment using minimum stent area/mean reference lumen area ([proximal reference area+distal reference area]/2). The smaller of the 2 was considered to be the SEI of that case. Follow‐up MACE was defined as a composite of all‐cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization. Average minimum stent area was 6.02 (interquartile range, 4.65–7.92) mm(2), while SEI was 0.79 (interquartile range, 0.71–0.86). Forty‐seven (12.7%) incidences of MACE were recorded for 370 included lesions during a median follow‐up duration of 557 (interquartile range, 323–1103) days. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 0.85 as the best SEI cutoff (<0.85) to predict follow‐up MACE (area under the curve, 0.60; sensitivity, 0.85; specificity, 0.34). MACE was observed in 40 of 260 (15.4%) lesions with SEI <0.85 and in 7 of 110 (6.4%) lesions with SEI ≥0.85 (P=0.02). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression identified SEI <0.85 (odds ratio, 3.55; 95% CI, 1.40–9.05; P<0.01) and coronary calcification (odds ratio, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.00–6.10; P=0.05) as independent predictors of follow‐up MACE. CONCLUSIONS: The present study identified SEI <0.85, associated with increased incidence of MACE, as the optimal cutoff in daily practice. Along with suboptimal SEI (<0.85), coronary calcification was also found to be a significant predictor of follow‐up MACE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9238610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92386102022-06-30 Stent Optimization Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Its Prognostic Implications After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Rai, Himanshu Harzer, Fiona Otsuka, Tatsuhiko Abdelwahed, Youssef S. Antuña, Paula Blachutzik, Florian Koppara, Tobias Räber, Lorenz Leistner, David M. Alfonso, Fernando Nef, Holger Seguchi, Masaru Aytekin, Alp Xhepa, Erion Kufner, Sebastian Cassese, Salvatore Laugwitz, Karl‐Ludwig Byrne, Robert A. Kastrati, Adnan Joner, Michael J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Stent underexpansion has been known to be associated with worse outcomes. We sought to define optical coherence tomography assessed optimal stent expansion index (SEI), which associates with lower incidence of follow‐up major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 315 patients (involving 370 lesions) who underwent optical coherence tomography–aided coronary stenting were retrospectively included. SEI was calculated separately for equal halves of each stented segment using minimum stent area/mean reference lumen area ([proximal reference area+distal reference area]/2). The smaller of the 2 was considered to be the SEI of that case. Follow‐up MACE was defined as a composite of all‐cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization. Average minimum stent area was 6.02 (interquartile range, 4.65–7.92) mm(2), while SEI was 0.79 (interquartile range, 0.71–0.86). Forty‐seven (12.7%) incidences of MACE were recorded for 370 included lesions during a median follow‐up duration of 557 (interquartile range, 323–1103) days. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 0.85 as the best SEI cutoff (<0.85) to predict follow‐up MACE (area under the curve, 0.60; sensitivity, 0.85; specificity, 0.34). MACE was observed in 40 of 260 (15.4%) lesions with SEI <0.85 and in 7 of 110 (6.4%) lesions with SEI ≥0.85 (P=0.02). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression identified SEI <0.85 (odds ratio, 3.55; 95% CI, 1.40–9.05; P<0.01) and coronary calcification (odds ratio, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.00–6.10; P=0.05) as independent predictors of follow‐up MACE. CONCLUSIONS: The present study identified SEI <0.85, associated with increased incidence of MACE, as the optimal cutoff in daily practice. Along with suboptimal SEI (<0.85), coronary calcification was also found to be a significant predictor of follow‐up MACE. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9238610/ /pubmed/35470682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.023493 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Rai, Himanshu
Harzer, Fiona
Otsuka, Tatsuhiko
Abdelwahed, Youssef S.
Antuña, Paula
Blachutzik, Florian
Koppara, Tobias
Räber, Lorenz
Leistner, David M.
Alfonso, Fernando
Nef, Holger
Seguchi, Masaru
Aytekin, Alp
Xhepa, Erion
Kufner, Sebastian
Cassese, Salvatore
Laugwitz, Karl‐Ludwig
Byrne, Robert A.
Kastrati, Adnan
Joner, Michael
Stent Optimization Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Its Prognostic Implications After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title Stent Optimization Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Its Prognostic Implications After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_full Stent Optimization Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Its Prognostic Implications After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_fullStr Stent Optimization Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Its Prognostic Implications After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_full_unstemmed Stent Optimization Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Its Prognostic Implications After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_short Stent Optimization Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Its Prognostic Implications After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_sort stent optimization using optical coherence tomography and its prognostic implications after percutaneous coronary intervention
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35470682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.023493
work_keys_str_mv AT raihimanshu stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT harzerfiona stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT otsukatatsuhiko stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT abdelwahedyoussefs stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT antunapaula stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT blachutzikflorian stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT kopparatobias stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT raberlorenz stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT leistnerdavidm stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT alfonsofernando stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT nefholger stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT seguchimasaru stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT aytekinalp stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT xhepaerion stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT kufnersebastian stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT cassesesalvatore stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT laugwitzkarlludwig stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT byrneroberta stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT kastratiadnan stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT jonermichael stentoptimizationusingopticalcoherencetomographyanditsprognosticimplicationsafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention