Cargando…

Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Instantaneous Wave‐Free Ratio in Assessment of Lesion Hemodynamic Significance and Explanation of their Discrepancies. International, Multicenter and Prospective Trial: The FiGARO Study

BACKGROUND: The FiGARO (FFR versus iFR in Assessment of Hemodynamic Lesion Significance, and an Explanation of Their Discrepancies) trial is a prospective registry searching for predictors of fractional flow reserve/instantaneous wave‐free ratio (FFR/iFR) discrepancy. METHODS AND RESULTS: FFR/iFR we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kovarnik, Tomas, Hitoshi, Matsuo, Kral, Ales, Jerabek, Stepan, Zemanek, David, Kawase, Yoshiaki, Omori, Hiroyuki, Tanigaki, Toru, Pudil, Jan, Vodzinska, Alexandra, Branny, Marian, Stipal, Roman, Kala, Petr, Mrozek, Jan, Porzer, Martin, Grezl, Tomas, Novobilsky, Kamil, Mendiz, Oscar, Kopriva, Karel, Mates, Martin, Chval, Martin, Chen, Zhi, Martasek, Pavel, Linhart, Ales
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35502771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.021490
_version_ 1784737101884948480
author Kovarnik, Tomas
Hitoshi, Matsuo
Kral, Ales
Jerabek, Stepan
Zemanek, David
Kawase, Yoshiaki
Omori, Hiroyuki
Tanigaki, Toru
Pudil, Jan
Vodzinska, Alexandra
Branny, Marian
Stipal, Roman
Kala, Petr
Mrozek, Jan
Porzer, Martin
Grezl, Tomas
Novobilsky, Kamil
Mendiz, Oscar
Kopriva, Karel
Mates, Martin
Chval, Martin
Chen, Zhi
Martasek, Pavel
Linhart, Ales
author_facet Kovarnik, Tomas
Hitoshi, Matsuo
Kral, Ales
Jerabek, Stepan
Zemanek, David
Kawase, Yoshiaki
Omori, Hiroyuki
Tanigaki, Toru
Pudil, Jan
Vodzinska, Alexandra
Branny, Marian
Stipal, Roman
Kala, Petr
Mrozek, Jan
Porzer, Martin
Grezl, Tomas
Novobilsky, Kamil
Mendiz, Oscar
Kopriva, Karel
Mates, Martin
Chval, Martin
Chen, Zhi
Martasek, Pavel
Linhart, Ales
author_sort Kovarnik, Tomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The FiGARO (FFR versus iFR in Assessment of Hemodynamic Lesion Significance, and an Explanation of Their Discrepancies) trial is a prospective registry searching for predictors of fractional flow reserve/instantaneous wave‐free ratio (FFR/iFR) discrepancy. METHODS AND RESULTS: FFR/iFR were analyzed using a Verrata wire, and coronary flow reserve was analyzed using a Combomap machine (both Philips‐Volcano). The risk polymorphisms for endothelial nitric oxide synthase and for heme oxygenase‐1 were analyzed. In total, 1884 FFR/iFR measurements from 1564 patients were included. The FFR/iFR discrepancy occurred in 393 measurements (20.9%): FFRp (positive)/iFRn (negative) type (264 lesions, 14.0%) and FFRn/iFRp (129 lesions, 6.8%) type. Coronary flow reserve was measured in 343 lesions, correlating better with iFR (R=0.56, P<0.0001) than FFR (R=0.36, P<0.0001). The coronary flow reserve value in FFRp/iFRn lesions (2.24±0.7) was significantly higher compared with both FFRp/iFRp (1.39±0.36), and FFRn/iFRn lesions (1.8±0.64, P<0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed (1) sex, age, and lesion location in the right coronary artery as predictors for FFRp/iFRn discrepancy; and (2) hemoglobin level, smoking, and renal insufficiency as predictors for FFRn/iFRp discrepancy. The FFRn/iFRp type of discrepancy was significantly more frequent in patients with both risk types of polymorphisms (endothelial nitric oxide synthase(r)+heme oxygenase‐1(r)): 8 patients (24.2%) compared with FFRp/iFRn type of discrepancy: 2 patients (5.9%), P=0.03. CONCLUSIONS: Predictors for FFRp/iFRn discrepancy were sex, age, and location in the right coronary artery. Predictors for FFRn/iFRp were hemoglobin level, smoking, and renal insufficiency. The risk type of polymorphism in endothelial nitric oxide synthase and heme oxygenase‐1 genes was more frequently found in patients with FFRn/iFRp type of discrepancy. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03033810.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9238629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92386292022-06-30 Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Instantaneous Wave‐Free Ratio in Assessment of Lesion Hemodynamic Significance and Explanation of their Discrepancies. International, Multicenter and Prospective Trial: The FiGARO Study Kovarnik, Tomas Hitoshi, Matsuo Kral, Ales Jerabek, Stepan Zemanek, David Kawase, Yoshiaki Omori, Hiroyuki Tanigaki, Toru Pudil, Jan Vodzinska, Alexandra Branny, Marian Stipal, Roman Kala, Petr Mrozek, Jan Porzer, Martin Grezl, Tomas Novobilsky, Kamil Mendiz, Oscar Kopriva, Karel Mates, Martin Chval, Martin Chen, Zhi Martasek, Pavel Linhart, Ales J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: The FiGARO (FFR versus iFR in Assessment of Hemodynamic Lesion Significance, and an Explanation of Their Discrepancies) trial is a prospective registry searching for predictors of fractional flow reserve/instantaneous wave‐free ratio (FFR/iFR) discrepancy. METHODS AND RESULTS: FFR/iFR were analyzed using a Verrata wire, and coronary flow reserve was analyzed using a Combomap machine (both Philips‐Volcano). The risk polymorphisms for endothelial nitric oxide synthase and for heme oxygenase‐1 were analyzed. In total, 1884 FFR/iFR measurements from 1564 patients were included. The FFR/iFR discrepancy occurred in 393 measurements (20.9%): FFRp (positive)/iFRn (negative) type (264 lesions, 14.0%) and FFRn/iFRp (129 lesions, 6.8%) type. Coronary flow reserve was measured in 343 lesions, correlating better with iFR (R=0.56, P<0.0001) than FFR (R=0.36, P<0.0001). The coronary flow reserve value in FFRp/iFRn lesions (2.24±0.7) was significantly higher compared with both FFRp/iFRp (1.39±0.36), and FFRn/iFRn lesions (1.8±0.64, P<0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed (1) sex, age, and lesion location in the right coronary artery as predictors for FFRp/iFRn discrepancy; and (2) hemoglobin level, smoking, and renal insufficiency as predictors for FFRn/iFRp discrepancy. The FFRn/iFRp type of discrepancy was significantly more frequent in patients with both risk types of polymorphisms (endothelial nitric oxide synthase(r)+heme oxygenase‐1(r)): 8 patients (24.2%) compared with FFRp/iFRn type of discrepancy: 2 patients (5.9%), P=0.03. CONCLUSIONS: Predictors for FFRp/iFRn discrepancy were sex, age, and location in the right coronary artery. Predictors for FFRn/iFRp were hemoglobin level, smoking, and renal insufficiency. The risk type of polymorphism in endothelial nitric oxide synthase and heme oxygenase‐1 genes was more frequently found in patients with FFRn/iFRp type of discrepancy. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03033810. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9238629/ /pubmed/35502771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.021490 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kovarnik, Tomas
Hitoshi, Matsuo
Kral, Ales
Jerabek, Stepan
Zemanek, David
Kawase, Yoshiaki
Omori, Hiroyuki
Tanigaki, Toru
Pudil, Jan
Vodzinska, Alexandra
Branny, Marian
Stipal, Roman
Kala, Petr
Mrozek, Jan
Porzer, Martin
Grezl, Tomas
Novobilsky, Kamil
Mendiz, Oscar
Kopriva, Karel
Mates, Martin
Chval, Martin
Chen, Zhi
Martasek, Pavel
Linhart, Ales
Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Instantaneous Wave‐Free Ratio in Assessment of Lesion Hemodynamic Significance and Explanation of their Discrepancies. International, Multicenter and Prospective Trial: The FiGARO Study
title Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Instantaneous Wave‐Free Ratio in Assessment of Lesion Hemodynamic Significance and Explanation of their Discrepancies. International, Multicenter and Prospective Trial: The FiGARO Study
title_full Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Instantaneous Wave‐Free Ratio in Assessment of Lesion Hemodynamic Significance and Explanation of their Discrepancies. International, Multicenter and Prospective Trial: The FiGARO Study
title_fullStr Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Instantaneous Wave‐Free Ratio in Assessment of Lesion Hemodynamic Significance and Explanation of their Discrepancies. International, Multicenter and Prospective Trial: The FiGARO Study
title_full_unstemmed Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Instantaneous Wave‐Free Ratio in Assessment of Lesion Hemodynamic Significance and Explanation of their Discrepancies. International, Multicenter and Prospective Trial: The FiGARO Study
title_short Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Instantaneous Wave‐Free Ratio in Assessment of Lesion Hemodynamic Significance and Explanation of their Discrepancies. International, Multicenter and Prospective Trial: The FiGARO Study
title_sort fractional flow reserve versus instantaneous wave‐free ratio in assessment of lesion hemodynamic significance and explanation of their discrepancies. international, multicenter and prospective trial: the figaro study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35502771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.021490
work_keys_str_mv AT kovarniktomas fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT hitoshimatsuo fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT kralales fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT jerabekstepan fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT zemanekdavid fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT kawaseyoshiaki fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT omorihiroyuki fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT tanigakitoru fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT pudiljan fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT vodzinskaalexandra fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT brannymarian fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT stipalroman fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT kalapetr fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT mrozekjan fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT porzermartin fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT grezltomas fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT novobilskykamil fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT mendizoscar fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT koprivakarel fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT matesmartin fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT chvalmartin fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT chenzhi fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT martasekpavel fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT linhartales fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy
AT fractionalflowreserveversusinstantaneouswavefreeratioinassessmentoflesionhemodynamicsignificanceandexplanationoftheirdiscrepanciesinternationalmulticenterandprospectivetrialthefigarostudy