Cargando…

Prognostic Implications of Prestent Pullback Pressure Gradient and Poststent Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND: Coronary diffuse disease associates with poor outcomes, but little is known about its role after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to investigate the prognostic implication of pre‐PCI focal or diffuse disease patterns combined with post‐PCI quantitative flow ratio (QFR)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dai, Neng, Yuan, Sheng, Dou, Kefei, Zhang, Rui, Hu, Nan, He, Jining, Guan, Changdong, Zou, Tongqiang, Qiao, Zheng, Duan, Shaofeng, Xie, Lihua, Yu, Yongfu, Zhang, Yingmei, Xu, Bo, Ge, Junbo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35656982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024903
_version_ 1784737130372661248
author Dai, Neng
Yuan, Sheng
Dou, Kefei
Zhang, Rui
Hu, Nan
He, Jining
Guan, Changdong
Zou, Tongqiang
Qiao, Zheng
Duan, Shaofeng
Xie, Lihua
Yu, Yongfu
Zhang, Yingmei
Xu, Bo
Ge, Junbo
author_facet Dai, Neng
Yuan, Sheng
Dou, Kefei
Zhang, Rui
Hu, Nan
He, Jining
Guan, Changdong
Zou, Tongqiang
Qiao, Zheng
Duan, Shaofeng
Xie, Lihua
Yu, Yongfu
Zhang, Yingmei
Xu, Bo
Ge, Junbo
author_sort Dai, Neng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coronary diffuse disease associates with poor outcomes, but little is known about its role after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to investigate the prognostic implication of pre‐PCI focal or diffuse disease patterns combined with post‐PCI quantitative flow ratio (QFR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Pre‐PCI QFR derived pullback pressure gradient (PPG) (QFR‐PPG) was measured to assess physiological disease patterns for 1685 included vessels; the vessels were classified according to dichotomous pre‐PCI QFR‐PPG and post‐PCI QFR. Vessel‐oriented composite outcome, a composite of vessel‐related ischemia‐driven revascularization, vessel‐related myocardial infarction, or cardiac death at 2 years was compared among these groups. Vessels with low pre‐PCI PPG (3.9% versus 2.0%, hazard ratio [HR], 1.93; 95% CI, 1.08–3.44; P=0.02) or low post‐PCI QFR (9.8% versus 2.7%, HR, 3.78; 95% CI, 1.61–8.87; P=0.001) demonstrated higher vessel‐oriented composite outcome risk after stent implantation. Of note, despite high post‐PCI QFR achieved, vessels with low pre‐PCI QFR‐PPG presented higher risk of vessel‐oriented composite outcome than those with high pre‐PCI QFR‐PPG (3.7% versus 1.8%, HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.09–3.76; P=0.03) and pre‐PCI QFR‐PPG demonstrated direct prognostic effect not mediated by post‐PCI QFR. Integration of groups classified by pre‐PCI QFR‐PPG and post‐PCI QFR showed significantly higher discriminant and reclassification abilities than clinical factors (C‐index 0.77 versus 0.72, P=0.03; integrated discrimination improvement 0.93%, P=0.04; net reclassification index 0.33, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic value of pre‐PCI focal or diffuse disease patterns assessed by QFR‐PPG index was retained even after successful PCI, which is mostly explained by its direct effect that was not mediated by post‐PCI QFR. Integration of both pre‐PCI and post‐PCI physiological information can provide better risk stratification in vessels with stent implantation. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05104580.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9238737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92387372022-06-30 Prognostic Implications of Prestent Pullback Pressure Gradient and Poststent Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Dai, Neng Yuan, Sheng Dou, Kefei Zhang, Rui Hu, Nan He, Jining Guan, Changdong Zou, Tongqiang Qiao, Zheng Duan, Shaofeng Xie, Lihua Yu, Yongfu Zhang, Yingmei Xu, Bo Ge, Junbo J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Coronary diffuse disease associates with poor outcomes, but little is known about its role after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to investigate the prognostic implication of pre‐PCI focal or diffuse disease patterns combined with post‐PCI quantitative flow ratio (QFR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Pre‐PCI QFR derived pullback pressure gradient (PPG) (QFR‐PPG) was measured to assess physiological disease patterns for 1685 included vessels; the vessels were classified according to dichotomous pre‐PCI QFR‐PPG and post‐PCI QFR. Vessel‐oriented composite outcome, a composite of vessel‐related ischemia‐driven revascularization, vessel‐related myocardial infarction, or cardiac death at 2 years was compared among these groups. Vessels with low pre‐PCI PPG (3.9% versus 2.0%, hazard ratio [HR], 1.93; 95% CI, 1.08–3.44; P=0.02) or low post‐PCI QFR (9.8% versus 2.7%, HR, 3.78; 95% CI, 1.61–8.87; P=0.001) demonstrated higher vessel‐oriented composite outcome risk after stent implantation. Of note, despite high post‐PCI QFR achieved, vessels with low pre‐PCI QFR‐PPG presented higher risk of vessel‐oriented composite outcome than those with high pre‐PCI QFR‐PPG (3.7% versus 1.8%, HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.09–3.76; P=0.03) and pre‐PCI QFR‐PPG demonstrated direct prognostic effect not mediated by post‐PCI QFR. Integration of groups classified by pre‐PCI QFR‐PPG and post‐PCI QFR showed significantly higher discriminant and reclassification abilities than clinical factors (C‐index 0.77 versus 0.72, P=0.03; integrated discrimination improvement 0.93%, P=0.04; net reclassification index 0.33, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic value of pre‐PCI focal or diffuse disease patterns assessed by QFR‐PPG index was retained even after successful PCI, which is mostly explained by its direct effect that was not mediated by post‐PCI QFR. Integration of both pre‐PCI and post‐PCI physiological information can provide better risk stratification in vessels with stent implantation. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05104580. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9238737/ /pubmed/35656982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024903 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Dai, Neng
Yuan, Sheng
Dou, Kefei
Zhang, Rui
Hu, Nan
He, Jining
Guan, Changdong
Zou, Tongqiang
Qiao, Zheng
Duan, Shaofeng
Xie, Lihua
Yu, Yongfu
Zhang, Yingmei
Xu, Bo
Ge, Junbo
Prognostic Implications of Prestent Pullback Pressure Gradient and Poststent Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title Prognostic Implications of Prestent Pullback Pressure Gradient and Poststent Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_full Prognostic Implications of Prestent Pullback Pressure Gradient and Poststent Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_fullStr Prognostic Implications of Prestent Pullback Pressure Gradient and Poststent Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Implications of Prestent Pullback Pressure Gradient and Poststent Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_short Prognostic Implications of Prestent Pullback Pressure Gradient and Poststent Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_sort prognostic implications of prestent pullback pressure gradient and poststent quantitative flow ratio in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35656982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024903
work_keys_str_mv AT daineng prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT yuansheng prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT doukefei prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT zhangrui prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT hunan prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT hejining prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT guanchangdong prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT zoutongqiang prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT qiaozheng prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT duanshaofeng prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT xielihua prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT yuyongfu prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT zhangyingmei prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT xubo prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT gejunbo prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention