Cargando…
Prognostic Implications of Prestent Pullback Pressure Gradient and Poststent Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
BACKGROUND: Coronary diffuse disease associates with poor outcomes, but little is known about its role after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to investigate the prognostic implication of pre‐PCI focal or diffuse disease patterns combined with post‐PCI quantitative flow ratio (QFR)....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35656982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024903 |
_version_ | 1784737130372661248 |
---|---|
author | Dai, Neng Yuan, Sheng Dou, Kefei Zhang, Rui Hu, Nan He, Jining Guan, Changdong Zou, Tongqiang Qiao, Zheng Duan, Shaofeng Xie, Lihua Yu, Yongfu Zhang, Yingmei Xu, Bo Ge, Junbo |
author_facet | Dai, Neng Yuan, Sheng Dou, Kefei Zhang, Rui Hu, Nan He, Jining Guan, Changdong Zou, Tongqiang Qiao, Zheng Duan, Shaofeng Xie, Lihua Yu, Yongfu Zhang, Yingmei Xu, Bo Ge, Junbo |
author_sort | Dai, Neng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Coronary diffuse disease associates with poor outcomes, but little is known about its role after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to investigate the prognostic implication of pre‐PCI focal or diffuse disease patterns combined with post‐PCI quantitative flow ratio (QFR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Pre‐PCI QFR derived pullback pressure gradient (PPG) (QFR‐PPG) was measured to assess physiological disease patterns for 1685 included vessels; the vessels were classified according to dichotomous pre‐PCI QFR‐PPG and post‐PCI QFR. Vessel‐oriented composite outcome, a composite of vessel‐related ischemia‐driven revascularization, vessel‐related myocardial infarction, or cardiac death at 2 years was compared among these groups. Vessels with low pre‐PCI PPG (3.9% versus 2.0%, hazard ratio [HR], 1.93; 95% CI, 1.08–3.44; P=0.02) or low post‐PCI QFR (9.8% versus 2.7%, HR, 3.78; 95% CI, 1.61–8.87; P=0.001) demonstrated higher vessel‐oriented composite outcome risk after stent implantation. Of note, despite high post‐PCI QFR achieved, vessels with low pre‐PCI QFR‐PPG presented higher risk of vessel‐oriented composite outcome than those with high pre‐PCI QFR‐PPG (3.7% versus 1.8%, HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.09–3.76; P=0.03) and pre‐PCI QFR‐PPG demonstrated direct prognostic effect not mediated by post‐PCI QFR. Integration of groups classified by pre‐PCI QFR‐PPG and post‐PCI QFR showed significantly higher discriminant and reclassification abilities than clinical factors (C‐index 0.77 versus 0.72, P=0.03; integrated discrimination improvement 0.93%, P=0.04; net reclassification index 0.33, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic value of pre‐PCI focal or diffuse disease patterns assessed by QFR‐PPG index was retained even after successful PCI, which is mostly explained by its direct effect that was not mediated by post‐PCI QFR. Integration of both pre‐PCI and post‐PCI physiological information can provide better risk stratification in vessels with stent implantation. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05104580. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9238737 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92387372022-06-30 Prognostic Implications of Prestent Pullback Pressure Gradient and Poststent Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Dai, Neng Yuan, Sheng Dou, Kefei Zhang, Rui Hu, Nan He, Jining Guan, Changdong Zou, Tongqiang Qiao, Zheng Duan, Shaofeng Xie, Lihua Yu, Yongfu Zhang, Yingmei Xu, Bo Ge, Junbo J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Coronary diffuse disease associates with poor outcomes, but little is known about its role after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to investigate the prognostic implication of pre‐PCI focal or diffuse disease patterns combined with post‐PCI quantitative flow ratio (QFR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Pre‐PCI QFR derived pullback pressure gradient (PPG) (QFR‐PPG) was measured to assess physiological disease patterns for 1685 included vessels; the vessels were classified according to dichotomous pre‐PCI QFR‐PPG and post‐PCI QFR. Vessel‐oriented composite outcome, a composite of vessel‐related ischemia‐driven revascularization, vessel‐related myocardial infarction, or cardiac death at 2 years was compared among these groups. Vessels with low pre‐PCI PPG (3.9% versus 2.0%, hazard ratio [HR], 1.93; 95% CI, 1.08–3.44; P=0.02) or low post‐PCI QFR (9.8% versus 2.7%, HR, 3.78; 95% CI, 1.61–8.87; P=0.001) demonstrated higher vessel‐oriented composite outcome risk after stent implantation. Of note, despite high post‐PCI QFR achieved, vessels with low pre‐PCI QFR‐PPG presented higher risk of vessel‐oriented composite outcome than those with high pre‐PCI QFR‐PPG (3.7% versus 1.8%, HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.09–3.76; P=0.03) and pre‐PCI QFR‐PPG demonstrated direct prognostic effect not mediated by post‐PCI QFR. Integration of groups classified by pre‐PCI QFR‐PPG and post‐PCI QFR showed significantly higher discriminant and reclassification abilities than clinical factors (C‐index 0.77 versus 0.72, P=0.03; integrated discrimination improvement 0.93%, P=0.04; net reclassification index 0.33, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic value of pre‐PCI focal or diffuse disease patterns assessed by QFR‐PPG index was retained even after successful PCI, which is mostly explained by its direct effect that was not mediated by post‐PCI QFR. Integration of both pre‐PCI and post‐PCI physiological information can provide better risk stratification in vessels with stent implantation. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05104580. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9238737/ /pubmed/35656982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024903 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Dai, Neng Yuan, Sheng Dou, Kefei Zhang, Rui Hu, Nan He, Jining Guan, Changdong Zou, Tongqiang Qiao, Zheng Duan, Shaofeng Xie, Lihua Yu, Yongfu Zhang, Yingmei Xu, Bo Ge, Junbo Prognostic Implications of Prestent Pullback Pressure Gradient and Poststent Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title | Prognostic Implications of Prestent Pullback Pressure Gradient and Poststent Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title_full | Prognostic Implications of Prestent Pullback Pressure Gradient and Poststent Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title_fullStr | Prognostic Implications of Prestent Pullback Pressure Gradient and Poststent Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic Implications of Prestent Pullback Pressure Gradient and Poststent Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title_short | Prognostic Implications of Prestent Pullback Pressure Gradient and Poststent Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
title_sort | prognostic implications of prestent pullback pressure gradient and poststent quantitative flow ratio in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35656982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024903 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daineng prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT yuansheng prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT doukefei prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT zhangrui prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT hunan prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT hejining prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT guanchangdong prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT zoutongqiang prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT qiaozheng prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT duanshaofeng prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT xielihua prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT yuyongfu prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT zhangyingmei prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT xubo prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT gejunbo prognosticimplicationsofprestentpullbackpressuregradientandpoststentquantitativeflowratioinpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryintervention |