Cargando…

Comparison of Tricuspid Regurgitation Severity Between Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) lead placement can worsen tricuspid regurgitation (TR). TR is known to be associated with lower survival irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) or pulmonary hypertension (PH). Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Livesay, James, Fogelson, Benjamin, Tahir, Hassan, Baljepally, Raj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9239508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836733
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr1365
_version_ 1784737313314570240
author Livesay, James
Fogelson, Benjamin
Tahir, Hassan
Baljepally, Raj
author_facet Livesay, James
Fogelson, Benjamin
Tahir, Hassan
Baljepally, Raj
author_sort Livesay, James
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) lead placement can worsen tricuspid regurgitation (TR). TR is known to be associated with lower survival irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) or pulmonary hypertension (PH). Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often have PH and pre-existent TR with higher morbidity and mortality from worsening TR. Prior studies are lacking to indicate if cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be more beneficial in lessening TR in COPD patients. Therefore, we sought to study if patients with COPD will have less TR with CRT versus non-CRT devices. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center analysis on 154 COPD patients (mean age = 71.69 ± 10.58, males = 54.14%) that required single-chamber (n = 27), dual-chamber (n = 90), or CRT (n = 37) devices. TR severity, LVEF and right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) were evaluated by two cardiologists in a blinded fashion. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Chi-square tests were applied for continuous and categorical variables respectively. The primary endpoint was a change in the severity of TR comparing pre-device versus post-device echocardiogram. Secondary endpoints included changes in LVEF and RVSP. RESULTS: COPD patients, who underwent a CRT device had a significantly lower incidence of worsening TR (16%) when compared to single- (37%) (P = 0.001) and dual-chamber devices (30%) (P = 0.02). The increase in RVSP was similar between the groups. There was an expected improvement in LVEF in the CRT group. CONCLUSIONS: COPD patients receiving a CRT device were least likely to have worsening TR, compared to single- or dual-chamber devices. Since both COPD and progression in TR may result in poor outcomes, our study may suggest that an upfront strategy of CRT rather than a single- or dual-chamber device may be more beneficial in COPD patients, especially with pre-existent TR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9239508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92395082022-07-13 Comparison of Tricuspid Regurgitation Severity Between Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Livesay, James Fogelson, Benjamin Tahir, Hassan Baljepally, Raj Cardiol Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) lead placement can worsen tricuspid regurgitation (TR). TR is known to be associated with lower survival irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) or pulmonary hypertension (PH). Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often have PH and pre-existent TR with higher morbidity and mortality from worsening TR. Prior studies are lacking to indicate if cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be more beneficial in lessening TR in COPD patients. Therefore, we sought to study if patients with COPD will have less TR with CRT versus non-CRT devices. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center analysis on 154 COPD patients (mean age = 71.69 ± 10.58, males = 54.14%) that required single-chamber (n = 27), dual-chamber (n = 90), or CRT (n = 37) devices. TR severity, LVEF and right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) were evaluated by two cardiologists in a blinded fashion. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Chi-square tests were applied for continuous and categorical variables respectively. The primary endpoint was a change in the severity of TR comparing pre-device versus post-device echocardiogram. Secondary endpoints included changes in LVEF and RVSP. RESULTS: COPD patients, who underwent a CRT device had a significantly lower incidence of worsening TR (16%) when compared to single- (37%) (P = 0.001) and dual-chamber devices (30%) (P = 0.02). The increase in RVSP was similar between the groups. There was an expected improvement in LVEF in the CRT group. CONCLUSIONS: COPD patients receiving a CRT device were least likely to have worsening TR, compared to single- or dual-chamber devices. Since both COPD and progression in TR may result in poor outcomes, our study may suggest that an upfront strategy of CRT rather than a single- or dual-chamber device may be more beneficial in COPD patients, especially with pre-existent TR. Elmer Press 2022-06 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9239508/ /pubmed/35836733 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr1365 Text en Copyright 2022, Livesay et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Livesay, James
Fogelson, Benjamin
Tahir, Hassan
Baljepally, Raj
Comparison of Tricuspid Regurgitation Severity Between Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title Comparison of Tricuspid Regurgitation Severity Between Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_full Comparison of Tricuspid Regurgitation Severity Between Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_fullStr Comparison of Tricuspid Regurgitation Severity Between Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Tricuspid Regurgitation Severity Between Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_short Comparison of Tricuspid Regurgitation Severity Between Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_sort comparison of tricuspid regurgitation severity between cardiac resynchronization therapy versus right ventricular pacing in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9239508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836733
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr1365
work_keys_str_mv AT livesayjames comparisonoftricuspidregurgitationseveritybetweencardiacresynchronizationtherapyversusrightventricularpacinginpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT fogelsonbenjamin comparisonoftricuspidregurgitationseveritybetweencardiacresynchronizationtherapyversusrightventricularpacinginpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT tahirhassan comparisonoftricuspidregurgitationseveritybetweencardiacresynchronizationtherapyversusrightventricularpacinginpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT baljepallyraj comparisonoftricuspidregurgitationseveritybetweencardiacresynchronizationtherapyversusrightventricularpacinginpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease