Cargando…

A systematic literature review of real-world treatment outcomes of small cell lung cancer

Robust evidence from real-world studies is needed to aid decision-makers and other stakeholders in choosing the best treatment options for patients. The objective of this work was to assess real-world outcomes of treatment strategies for limited- and extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) pri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stokes, Michael, Berfeld, Noami, Gayle, Alicia, Descoteaux, Andrew, Rohrmoser, Oscar, Franks, April
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9239604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35777024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029783
_version_ 1784737335506632704
author Stokes, Michael
Berfeld, Noami
Gayle, Alicia
Descoteaux, Andrew
Rohrmoser, Oscar
Franks, April
author_facet Stokes, Michael
Berfeld, Noami
Gayle, Alicia
Descoteaux, Andrew
Rohrmoser, Oscar
Franks, April
author_sort Stokes, Michael
collection PubMed
description Robust evidence from real-world studies is needed to aid decision-makers and other stakeholders in choosing the best treatment options for patients. The objective of this work was to assess real-world outcomes of treatment strategies for limited- and extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) prior to the global introduction of immunotherapies for this disease. METHODS: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE and Embase to identify articles published in English from October 1, 2015, through May 20, 2020. Searches were designed using a combination of Medical Subject Heading (Medline), Emtree (Embase subject headings), and free-text terms such as SCLC. Observational studies reporting data on outcomes of initial treatment strategies in patients with limited- and extensive-stage SCLC were included. Studies with limited sample sizes (<100 patients), enrolled all patients prior to 2010, or did not report outcomes for limited- and extensive-stage SCLC separately were excluded. Data were extracted into a predesigned template by a single researcher. All extractions were validated by a second researcher, with disagreements resolved via consensus. RESULTS: Forty articles were included in this review. Most enrolled patients from the United States (n = 18 articles) or China (n = 12 articles). Most examined limited-stage (n = 27 articles) SCLC. All studies examined overall survival as the primary outcome. Articles investigating limited-stage SCLC reported outcomes for surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and adjuvant prophylactic cranial irradiation. In studies examining multiple treatment strategies, chemoradiotherapy was the most commonly utilized therapy (56%–82%), with chemotherapy used in 18% to 44% of patients. Across studies, median overall survival was generally higher for chemoradiotherapy (15–45 months) compared with chemotherapy alone (6.0–15.6 months). Studies of extensive-stage SCLC primarily reported on chemotherapy alone, consolidative thoracic radiotherapy, and radiotherapy for patients presenting with brain metastases. Overall survival was generally lower for patients receiving chemotherapy alone (median: 6.4–16.5 months; 3 years, 5%–14.9%) compared with chemotherapy in combination with consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (median: 12.1–18.0 months; 3 years, 15.0%–18.1%). Studies examining whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases reported lower median overall survival (5.6–8.7 months) compared with stereotactic radiosurgery (10.0–14.5 months). CONCLUSIONS: Under current standard of care, which has remained relatively unchanged over the past few decades, prognosis remains poor for patients with SCLC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9239604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92396042022-06-30 A systematic literature review of real-world treatment outcomes of small cell lung cancer Stokes, Michael Berfeld, Noami Gayle, Alicia Descoteaux, Andrew Rohrmoser, Oscar Franks, April Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article Robust evidence from real-world studies is needed to aid decision-makers and other stakeholders in choosing the best treatment options for patients. The objective of this work was to assess real-world outcomes of treatment strategies for limited- and extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) prior to the global introduction of immunotherapies for this disease. METHODS: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE and Embase to identify articles published in English from October 1, 2015, through May 20, 2020. Searches were designed using a combination of Medical Subject Heading (Medline), Emtree (Embase subject headings), and free-text terms such as SCLC. Observational studies reporting data on outcomes of initial treatment strategies in patients with limited- and extensive-stage SCLC were included. Studies with limited sample sizes (<100 patients), enrolled all patients prior to 2010, or did not report outcomes for limited- and extensive-stage SCLC separately were excluded. Data were extracted into a predesigned template by a single researcher. All extractions were validated by a second researcher, with disagreements resolved via consensus. RESULTS: Forty articles were included in this review. Most enrolled patients from the United States (n = 18 articles) or China (n = 12 articles). Most examined limited-stage (n = 27 articles) SCLC. All studies examined overall survival as the primary outcome. Articles investigating limited-stage SCLC reported outcomes for surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and adjuvant prophylactic cranial irradiation. In studies examining multiple treatment strategies, chemoradiotherapy was the most commonly utilized therapy (56%–82%), with chemotherapy used in 18% to 44% of patients. Across studies, median overall survival was generally higher for chemoradiotherapy (15–45 months) compared with chemotherapy alone (6.0–15.6 months). Studies of extensive-stage SCLC primarily reported on chemotherapy alone, consolidative thoracic radiotherapy, and radiotherapy for patients presenting with brain metastases. Overall survival was generally lower for patients receiving chemotherapy alone (median: 6.4–16.5 months; 3 years, 5%–14.9%) compared with chemotherapy in combination with consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (median: 12.1–18.0 months; 3 years, 15.0%–18.1%). Studies examining whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases reported lower median overall survival (5.6–8.7 months) compared with stereotactic radiosurgery (10.0–14.5 months). CONCLUSIONS: Under current standard of care, which has remained relatively unchanged over the past few decades, prognosis remains poor for patients with SCLC. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9239604/ /pubmed/35777024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029783 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stokes, Michael
Berfeld, Noami
Gayle, Alicia
Descoteaux, Andrew
Rohrmoser, Oscar
Franks, April
A systematic literature review of real-world treatment outcomes of small cell lung cancer
title A systematic literature review of real-world treatment outcomes of small cell lung cancer
title_full A systematic literature review of real-world treatment outcomes of small cell lung cancer
title_fullStr A systematic literature review of real-world treatment outcomes of small cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed A systematic literature review of real-world treatment outcomes of small cell lung cancer
title_short A systematic literature review of real-world treatment outcomes of small cell lung cancer
title_sort systematic literature review of real-world treatment outcomes of small cell lung cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9239604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35777024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029783
work_keys_str_mv AT stokesmichael asystematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer
AT berfeldnoami asystematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer
AT gaylealicia asystematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer
AT descoteauxandrew asystematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer
AT rohrmoseroscar asystematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer
AT franksapril asystematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer
AT stokesmichael systematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer
AT berfeldnoami systematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer
AT gaylealicia systematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer
AT descoteauxandrew systematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer
AT rohrmoseroscar systematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer
AT franksapril systematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer