Cargando…
A systematic literature review of real-world treatment outcomes of small cell lung cancer
Robust evidence from real-world studies is needed to aid decision-makers and other stakeholders in choosing the best treatment options for patients. The objective of this work was to assess real-world outcomes of treatment strategies for limited- and extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) pri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9239604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35777024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029783 |
_version_ | 1784737335506632704 |
---|---|
author | Stokes, Michael Berfeld, Noami Gayle, Alicia Descoteaux, Andrew Rohrmoser, Oscar Franks, April |
author_facet | Stokes, Michael Berfeld, Noami Gayle, Alicia Descoteaux, Andrew Rohrmoser, Oscar Franks, April |
author_sort | Stokes, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Robust evidence from real-world studies is needed to aid decision-makers and other stakeholders in choosing the best treatment options for patients. The objective of this work was to assess real-world outcomes of treatment strategies for limited- and extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) prior to the global introduction of immunotherapies for this disease. METHODS: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE and Embase to identify articles published in English from October 1, 2015, through May 20, 2020. Searches were designed using a combination of Medical Subject Heading (Medline), Emtree (Embase subject headings), and free-text terms such as SCLC. Observational studies reporting data on outcomes of initial treatment strategies in patients with limited- and extensive-stage SCLC were included. Studies with limited sample sizes (<100 patients), enrolled all patients prior to 2010, or did not report outcomes for limited- and extensive-stage SCLC separately were excluded. Data were extracted into a predesigned template by a single researcher. All extractions were validated by a second researcher, with disagreements resolved via consensus. RESULTS: Forty articles were included in this review. Most enrolled patients from the United States (n = 18 articles) or China (n = 12 articles). Most examined limited-stage (n = 27 articles) SCLC. All studies examined overall survival as the primary outcome. Articles investigating limited-stage SCLC reported outcomes for surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and adjuvant prophylactic cranial irradiation. In studies examining multiple treatment strategies, chemoradiotherapy was the most commonly utilized therapy (56%–82%), with chemotherapy used in 18% to 44% of patients. Across studies, median overall survival was generally higher for chemoradiotherapy (15–45 months) compared with chemotherapy alone (6.0–15.6 months). Studies of extensive-stage SCLC primarily reported on chemotherapy alone, consolidative thoracic radiotherapy, and radiotherapy for patients presenting with brain metastases. Overall survival was generally lower for patients receiving chemotherapy alone (median: 6.4–16.5 months; 3 years, 5%–14.9%) compared with chemotherapy in combination with consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (median: 12.1–18.0 months; 3 years, 15.0%–18.1%). Studies examining whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases reported lower median overall survival (5.6–8.7 months) compared with stereotactic radiosurgery (10.0–14.5 months). CONCLUSIONS: Under current standard of care, which has remained relatively unchanged over the past few decades, prognosis remains poor for patients with SCLC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9239604 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92396042022-06-30 A systematic literature review of real-world treatment outcomes of small cell lung cancer Stokes, Michael Berfeld, Noami Gayle, Alicia Descoteaux, Andrew Rohrmoser, Oscar Franks, April Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article Robust evidence from real-world studies is needed to aid decision-makers and other stakeholders in choosing the best treatment options for patients. The objective of this work was to assess real-world outcomes of treatment strategies for limited- and extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) prior to the global introduction of immunotherapies for this disease. METHODS: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE and Embase to identify articles published in English from October 1, 2015, through May 20, 2020. Searches were designed using a combination of Medical Subject Heading (Medline), Emtree (Embase subject headings), and free-text terms such as SCLC. Observational studies reporting data on outcomes of initial treatment strategies in patients with limited- and extensive-stage SCLC were included. Studies with limited sample sizes (<100 patients), enrolled all patients prior to 2010, or did not report outcomes for limited- and extensive-stage SCLC separately were excluded. Data were extracted into a predesigned template by a single researcher. All extractions were validated by a second researcher, with disagreements resolved via consensus. RESULTS: Forty articles were included in this review. Most enrolled patients from the United States (n = 18 articles) or China (n = 12 articles). Most examined limited-stage (n = 27 articles) SCLC. All studies examined overall survival as the primary outcome. Articles investigating limited-stage SCLC reported outcomes for surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and adjuvant prophylactic cranial irradiation. In studies examining multiple treatment strategies, chemoradiotherapy was the most commonly utilized therapy (56%–82%), with chemotherapy used in 18% to 44% of patients. Across studies, median overall survival was generally higher for chemoradiotherapy (15–45 months) compared with chemotherapy alone (6.0–15.6 months). Studies of extensive-stage SCLC primarily reported on chemotherapy alone, consolidative thoracic radiotherapy, and radiotherapy for patients presenting with brain metastases. Overall survival was generally lower for patients receiving chemotherapy alone (median: 6.4–16.5 months; 3 years, 5%–14.9%) compared with chemotherapy in combination with consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (median: 12.1–18.0 months; 3 years, 15.0%–18.1%). Studies examining whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases reported lower median overall survival (5.6–8.7 months) compared with stereotactic radiosurgery (10.0–14.5 months). CONCLUSIONS: Under current standard of care, which has remained relatively unchanged over the past few decades, prognosis remains poor for patients with SCLC. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9239604/ /pubmed/35777024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029783 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Stokes, Michael Berfeld, Noami Gayle, Alicia Descoteaux, Andrew Rohrmoser, Oscar Franks, April A systematic literature review of real-world treatment outcomes of small cell lung cancer |
title | A systematic literature review of real-world treatment outcomes of small cell lung cancer |
title_full | A systematic literature review of real-world treatment outcomes of small cell lung cancer |
title_fullStr | A systematic literature review of real-world treatment outcomes of small cell lung cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic literature review of real-world treatment outcomes of small cell lung cancer |
title_short | A systematic literature review of real-world treatment outcomes of small cell lung cancer |
title_sort | systematic literature review of real-world treatment outcomes of small cell lung cancer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9239604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35777024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029783 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stokesmichael asystematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer AT berfeldnoami asystematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer AT gaylealicia asystematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer AT descoteauxandrew asystematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer AT rohrmoseroscar asystematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer AT franksapril asystematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer AT stokesmichael systematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer AT berfeldnoami systematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer AT gaylealicia systematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer AT descoteauxandrew systematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer AT rohrmoseroscar systematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer AT franksapril systematicliteraturereviewofrealworldtreatmentoutcomesofsmallcelllungcancer |