Cargando…

The Effectiveness and Safety of Ropivacaine and Medium-Dose Dexmedetomidine in Cesarean Section

Objective: To study the effects of epidural anesthesia with different doses of dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine on postoperative hemodynamics and neonatal outcome of cesarean section parturients. Methods. A total of 90 parturients who underwent cesarean section admitted to our hospital from January 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Bin-Bin, Niu, Shi-Kun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9239787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35774754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4447484
_version_ 1784737380822941696
author Huang, Bin-Bin
Niu, Shi-Kun
author_facet Huang, Bin-Bin
Niu, Shi-Kun
author_sort Huang, Bin-Bin
collection PubMed
description Objective: To study the effects of epidural anesthesia with different doses of dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine on postoperative hemodynamics and neonatal outcome of cesarean section parturients. Methods. A total of 90 parturients who underwent cesarean section admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to January 2020 were selected as the research objects and were divided into groups A, B, and C according to different dosages of dexmedetomidine, with 30 cases in each group. Groups A, B, and C were given dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg, 0.8 μg/kg, 1.0 μg/kg, respectively, combined with 0.2% ropivacaine. The anesthesia effect, traction response, hemodynamic indexes, and neonatal Apgar score of the three groups were compared; the “Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score” was used to assess the postoperative pain of the parturients, and the “Ramsay Sedation Scale” was used to assess the sedation state of the parturients. Results. The superior anesthesia effect of group B was obtained compared with groups A and C (P < 0.05). Group B witnessed a lower degree of grade III stretching response, as compared to group A (P < 0.05). In comparison with groups A and C, superior results of the heart rate and mean artery pressure (MAP) of group B at T1 and T2 were obtained (P < 0.05). The neonatal Apgar score in group B was lower than those in groups A and C (P < 0.05), and the NRS score of group B was also lower than that of group A (P < 0.05). Compared with groups A and C, group B yielded a more favorable outcome in terms of the Ramsay score (P < 0.05). Conclusion. The use of medium-dose dexmedetomidine in cesarean section parturients is safer and can effectively reduce the impact on maternal hemodynamics, which is worthy of promotion and application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9239787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92397872022-06-29 The Effectiveness and Safety of Ropivacaine and Medium-Dose Dexmedetomidine in Cesarean Section Huang, Bin-Bin Niu, Shi-Kun Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article Objective: To study the effects of epidural anesthesia with different doses of dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine on postoperative hemodynamics and neonatal outcome of cesarean section parturients. Methods. A total of 90 parturients who underwent cesarean section admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to January 2020 were selected as the research objects and were divided into groups A, B, and C according to different dosages of dexmedetomidine, with 30 cases in each group. Groups A, B, and C were given dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg, 0.8 μg/kg, 1.0 μg/kg, respectively, combined with 0.2% ropivacaine. The anesthesia effect, traction response, hemodynamic indexes, and neonatal Apgar score of the three groups were compared; the “Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score” was used to assess the postoperative pain of the parturients, and the “Ramsay Sedation Scale” was used to assess the sedation state of the parturients. Results. The superior anesthesia effect of group B was obtained compared with groups A and C (P < 0.05). Group B witnessed a lower degree of grade III stretching response, as compared to group A (P < 0.05). In comparison with groups A and C, superior results of the heart rate and mean artery pressure (MAP) of group B at T1 and T2 were obtained (P < 0.05). The neonatal Apgar score in group B was lower than those in groups A and C (P < 0.05), and the NRS score of group B was also lower than that of group A (P < 0.05). Compared with groups A and C, group B yielded a more favorable outcome in terms of the Ramsay score (P < 0.05). Conclusion. The use of medium-dose dexmedetomidine in cesarean section parturients is safer and can effectively reduce the impact on maternal hemodynamics, which is worthy of promotion and application. Hindawi 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9239787/ /pubmed/35774754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4447484 Text en Copyright © 2022 Bin-Bin Huang and Shi-Kun Niu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huang, Bin-Bin
Niu, Shi-Kun
The Effectiveness and Safety of Ropivacaine and Medium-Dose Dexmedetomidine in Cesarean Section
title The Effectiveness and Safety of Ropivacaine and Medium-Dose Dexmedetomidine in Cesarean Section
title_full The Effectiveness and Safety of Ropivacaine and Medium-Dose Dexmedetomidine in Cesarean Section
title_fullStr The Effectiveness and Safety of Ropivacaine and Medium-Dose Dexmedetomidine in Cesarean Section
title_full_unstemmed The Effectiveness and Safety of Ropivacaine and Medium-Dose Dexmedetomidine in Cesarean Section
title_short The Effectiveness and Safety of Ropivacaine and Medium-Dose Dexmedetomidine in Cesarean Section
title_sort effectiveness and safety of ropivacaine and medium-dose dexmedetomidine in cesarean section
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9239787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35774754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4447484
work_keys_str_mv AT huangbinbin theeffectivenessandsafetyofropivacaineandmediumdosedexmedetomidineincesareansection
AT niushikun theeffectivenessandsafetyofropivacaineandmediumdosedexmedetomidineincesareansection
AT huangbinbin effectivenessandsafetyofropivacaineandmediumdosedexmedetomidineincesareansection
AT niushikun effectivenessandsafetyofropivacaineandmediumdosedexmedetomidineincesareansection