Cargando…

Clinical Efficacy of Mechanical Traction as Physical Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed at exploring the clinical effect of mechanical traction on lumbar disc herniation (LDH). METHODS: Related literatures were retrieved from PubMed, Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, and CNKI databases. Inclusion of literature topic was comparison of mechanical traction and conve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Wenxian, Long, Feibing, Wu, Xinshun, Li, Shanhuan, Lin, Ji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9239808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35774300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5670303
_version_ 1784737388377931776
author Wang, Wenxian
Long, Feibing
Wu, Xinshun
Li, Shanhuan
Lin, Ji
author_facet Wang, Wenxian
Long, Feibing
Wu, Xinshun
Li, Shanhuan
Lin, Ji
author_sort Wang, Wenxian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed at exploring the clinical effect of mechanical traction on lumbar disc herniation (LDH). METHODS: Related literatures were retrieved from PubMed, Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, and CNKI databases. Inclusion of literature topic was comparison of mechanical traction and conventional physical therapy for lumbar disc herniation. Jadad scale was used to evaluate the quality of the included RCT studies. The Chi-square test was used for the heterogeneity test, and a random effect model was used with heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were used to explore the causes of heterogeneity. If there was no heterogeneity, the fixed effect model was used, and funnel plots were used to test publication bias. RESULTS: Visual analog scale (VAS) in the mechanical traction group was lower than that in the conventional physical therapy group (MD = −1.39 (95% CI (-1.81, -0.98)), Z = 6.56, and P < 0.00001). There was no heterogeneity among studies (Chi(2) = 6.62, P = 0.25, and I(2) = 24%) and no publication bias. Oswestry disability index (ODI) in the mechanical traction group was lower than that in the conventional physical therapy group (MD = −6.34 (95% CI (-10.28, -2.39)), Z = 3.15, and P = 0.002). There was no heterogeneity between studies (Chi(2) = 6.27, P = 0.18, and I(2) = 36%) and no publication bias. There was no significant difference in Schober test scores between the mechanical traction group and the conventional physical therapy group (MD = −0.40 (95% CI (-1.07, 0.28)), Z = 1.16, and P = 0.25). There was no heterogeneity among studies (Chi(2) = 1.61, P = 0.66, and I(2) = 0%) and no publication bias. CONCLUSION: Mechanical traction can effectively relieve lumbar and leg pain and improve ODI in patients with lumbar disc herniation but has no significant effect on spinal motion. The therapeutic effect of mechanical traction was significantly better than that of conventional physical therapy. Lumbar traction can be used in conjunction with other traditional physical therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9239808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92398082022-06-29 Clinical Efficacy of Mechanical Traction as Physical Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis Wang, Wenxian Long, Feibing Wu, Xinshun Li, Shanhuan Lin, Ji Comput Math Methods Med Research Article OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed at exploring the clinical effect of mechanical traction on lumbar disc herniation (LDH). METHODS: Related literatures were retrieved from PubMed, Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, and CNKI databases. Inclusion of literature topic was comparison of mechanical traction and conventional physical therapy for lumbar disc herniation. Jadad scale was used to evaluate the quality of the included RCT studies. The Chi-square test was used for the heterogeneity test, and a random effect model was used with heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were used to explore the causes of heterogeneity. If there was no heterogeneity, the fixed effect model was used, and funnel plots were used to test publication bias. RESULTS: Visual analog scale (VAS) in the mechanical traction group was lower than that in the conventional physical therapy group (MD = −1.39 (95% CI (-1.81, -0.98)), Z = 6.56, and P < 0.00001). There was no heterogeneity among studies (Chi(2) = 6.62, P = 0.25, and I(2) = 24%) and no publication bias. Oswestry disability index (ODI) in the mechanical traction group was lower than that in the conventional physical therapy group (MD = −6.34 (95% CI (-10.28, -2.39)), Z = 3.15, and P = 0.002). There was no heterogeneity between studies (Chi(2) = 6.27, P = 0.18, and I(2) = 36%) and no publication bias. There was no significant difference in Schober test scores between the mechanical traction group and the conventional physical therapy group (MD = −0.40 (95% CI (-1.07, 0.28)), Z = 1.16, and P = 0.25). There was no heterogeneity among studies (Chi(2) = 1.61, P = 0.66, and I(2) = 0%) and no publication bias. CONCLUSION: Mechanical traction can effectively relieve lumbar and leg pain and improve ODI in patients with lumbar disc herniation but has no significant effect on spinal motion. The therapeutic effect of mechanical traction was significantly better than that of conventional physical therapy. Lumbar traction can be used in conjunction with other traditional physical therapy. Hindawi 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9239808/ /pubmed/35774300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5670303 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wenxian Wang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Wenxian
Long, Feibing
Wu, Xinshun
Li, Shanhuan
Lin, Ji
Clinical Efficacy of Mechanical Traction as Physical Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis
title Clinical Efficacy of Mechanical Traction as Physical Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Clinical Efficacy of Mechanical Traction as Physical Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Clinical Efficacy of Mechanical Traction as Physical Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Efficacy of Mechanical Traction as Physical Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Clinical Efficacy of Mechanical Traction as Physical Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort clinical efficacy of mechanical traction as physical therapy for lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9239808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35774300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5670303
work_keys_str_mv AT wangwenxian clinicalefficacyofmechanicaltractionasphysicaltherapyforlumbardischerniationametaanalysis
AT longfeibing clinicalefficacyofmechanicaltractionasphysicaltherapyforlumbardischerniationametaanalysis
AT wuxinshun clinicalefficacyofmechanicaltractionasphysicaltherapyforlumbardischerniationametaanalysis
AT lishanhuan clinicalefficacyofmechanicaltractionasphysicaltherapyforlumbardischerniationametaanalysis
AT linji clinicalefficacyofmechanicaltractionasphysicaltherapyforlumbardischerniationametaanalysis