Cargando…

Facet Joint Versus Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections in Patients With Cervical Radicular Pain due to Foraminal Stenosis: A Retrospective Comparative Study

BACKGROUND: A cervical transforaminal epidural (TFE) steroid injection is a useful treatment option for cervical radicular pain, but it carries a small risk of catastrophic complications. Several studies have reported that cervical facet joint (FJ) steroid injection can reduce cervical radicular pai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chae, Ji Seon, Kim, Won-joong, Jue, Mi Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9239844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35762147
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e208
_version_ 1784737399950016512
author Chae, Ji Seon
Kim, Won-joong
Jue, Mi Jin
author_facet Chae, Ji Seon
Kim, Won-joong
Jue, Mi Jin
author_sort Chae, Ji Seon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A cervical transforaminal epidural (TFE) steroid injection is a useful treatment option for cervical radicular pain, but it carries a small risk of catastrophic complications. Several studies have reported that cervical facet joint (FJ) steroid injection can reduce cervical radicular pain through an indirect epidural spread. The aim of this retrospective comparative study was to evaluate the pain scores and functional disability in subjects receiving cervical FJ or TFE steroid injection for the treatment of cervical radicular pain due to foraminal stenosis (FS). METHODS: We selected 278 patients 18 years of age and older who underwent cervical FJ (n = 130) or TFE (n= 148) steroid injection for cervical radicular pain. The primary outcomes included pain scores and functional disability during hospital visits one, three, and six months after the initial injection. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of responders and Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) scores. Adverse events and variables correlating with effectiveness one month after the initial injection were also evaluated. RESULTS: The Numeric Rating Scale and Neck Disability Index scores showed a significant improvement one, three, and six months after the initial injection in both groups, with no significant differences between the groups. No significant differences were observed in the success rates of the procedure one, three, and six months after the initial injection for either group. There were no significant differences in MQS between the groups during the follow-up period. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that the injection method, age, sex, number of injections, FS severity, MQS, pain duration, and the presence of cervical disc herniation were not independent predictors of treatment success. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of FJ steroid injection may not be inferior to that of TFE steroid injection in patients with cervical radicular pain due to FS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9239844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92398442022-07-06 Facet Joint Versus Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections in Patients With Cervical Radicular Pain due to Foraminal Stenosis: A Retrospective Comparative Study Chae, Ji Seon Kim, Won-joong Jue, Mi Jin J Korean Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: A cervical transforaminal epidural (TFE) steroid injection is a useful treatment option for cervical radicular pain, but it carries a small risk of catastrophic complications. Several studies have reported that cervical facet joint (FJ) steroid injection can reduce cervical radicular pain through an indirect epidural spread. The aim of this retrospective comparative study was to evaluate the pain scores and functional disability in subjects receiving cervical FJ or TFE steroid injection for the treatment of cervical radicular pain due to foraminal stenosis (FS). METHODS: We selected 278 patients 18 years of age and older who underwent cervical FJ (n = 130) or TFE (n= 148) steroid injection for cervical radicular pain. The primary outcomes included pain scores and functional disability during hospital visits one, three, and six months after the initial injection. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of responders and Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) scores. Adverse events and variables correlating with effectiveness one month after the initial injection were also evaluated. RESULTS: The Numeric Rating Scale and Neck Disability Index scores showed a significant improvement one, three, and six months after the initial injection in both groups, with no significant differences between the groups. No significant differences were observed in the success rates of the procedure one, three, and six months after the initial injection for either group. There were no significant differences in MQS between the groups during the follow-up period. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that the injection method, age, sex, number of injections, FS severity, MQS, pain duration, and the presence of cervical disc herniation were not independent predictors of treatment success. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of FJ steroid injection may not be inferior to that of TFE steroid injection in patients with cervical radicular pain due to FS. The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9239844/ /pubmed/35762147 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e208 Text en © 2022 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chae, Ji Seon
Kim, Won-joong
Jue, Mi Jin
Facet Joint Versus Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections in Patients With Cervical Radicular Pain due to Foraminal Stenosis: A Retrospective Comparative Study
title Facet Joint Versus Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections in Patients With Cervical Radicular Pain due to Foraminal Stenosis: A Retrospective Comparative Study
title_full Facet Joint Versus Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections in Patients With Cervical Radicular Pain due to Foraminal Stenosis: A Retrospective Comparative Study
title_fullStr Facet Joint Versus Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections in Patients With Cervical Radicular Pain due to Foraminal Stenosis: A Retrospective Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Facet Joint Versus Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections in Patients With Cervical Radicular Pain due to Foraminal Stenosis: A Retrospective Comparative Study
title_short Facet Joint Versus Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections in Patients With Cervical Radicular Pain due to Foraminal Stenosis: A Retrospective Comparative Study
title_sort facet joint versus transforaminal epidural steroid injections in patients with cervical radicular pain due to foraminal stenosis: a retrospective comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9239844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35762147
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e208
work_keys_str_mv AT chaejiseon facetjointversustransforaminalepiduralsteroidinjectionsinpatientswithcervicalradicularpainduetoforaminalstenosisaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT kimwonjoong facetjointversustransforaminalepiduralsteroidinjectionsinpatientswithcervicalradicularpainduetoforaminalstenosisaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT juemijin facetjointversustransforaminalepiduralsteroidinjectionsinpatientswithcervicalradicularpainduetoforaminalstenosisaretrospectivecomparativestudy