Cargando…
Is it time to consider population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women? A position paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Epidemiology/Quality of Life Working Group
SUMMARY: The IOF Epidemiology and Quality of Life Working Group has reviewed the potential role of population screening for high hip fracture risk against well-established criteria. The report concludes that such an approach should strongly be considered in many health care systems to reduce the bur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer London
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9239944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35763133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01117-6 |
_version_ | 1784737426152882176 |
---|---|
author | Chotiyarnwong, P. McCloskey, E. V. Harvey, N. C. Lorentzon, M. Prieto-Alhambra, D. Abrahamsen, B. Adachi, J. D. Borgström, F. Bruyere, O. Carey, J. J. Clark, P. Cooper, C. Curtis, E. M. Dennison, E. Diaz-Curiel, M. Dimai, H. P. Grigorie, D. Hiligsmann, M. Khashayar, P. Lewiecki, E. M. Lips, P. Lorenc, R. S. Ortolani, S. Papaioannou, A. Silverman, S. Sosa, M. Szulc, P. Ward, K. A. Yoshimura, N. Kanis, J. A. |
author_facet | Chotiyarnwong, P. McCloskey, E. V. Harvey, N. C. Lorentzon, M. Prieto-Alhambra, D. Abrahamsen, B. Adachi, J. D. Borgström, F. Bruyere, O. Carey, J. J. Clark, P. Cooper, C. Curtis, E. M. Dennison, E. Diaz-Curiel, M. Dimai, H. P. Grigorie, D. Hiligsmann, M. Khashayar, P. Lewiecki, E. M. Lips, P. Lorenc, R. S. Ortolani, S. Papaioannou, A. Silverman, S. Sosa, M. Szulc, P. Ward, K. A. Yoshimura, N. Kanis, J. A. |
author_sort | Chotiyarnwong, P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | SUMMARY: The IOF Epidemiology and Quality of Life Working Group has reviewed the potential role of population screening for high hip fracture risk against well-established criteria. The report concludes that such an approach should strongly be considered in many health care systems to reduce the burden of hip fractures. INTRODUCTION: The burden of long-term osteoporosis management falls on primary care in most healthcare systems. However, a wide and stable treatment gap exists in many such settings; most of which appears to be secondary to a lack of awareness of fracture risk. Screening is a public health measure for the purpose of identifying individuals who are likely to benefit from further investigations and/or treatment to reduce the risk of a disease or its complications. The purpose of this report was to review the evidence for a potential screening programme to identify postmenopausal women at increased risk of hip fracture. METHODS: The approach took well-established criteria for the development of a screening program, adapted by the UK National Screening Committee, and sought the opinion of 20 members of the International Osteoporosis Foundation’s Working Group on Epidemiology and Quality of Life as to whether each criterion was met (yes, partial or no). For each criterion, the evidence base was then reviewed and summarized. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The report concludes that evidence supports the proposal that screening for high fracture risk in primary care should strongly be considered for incorporation into many health care systems to reduce the burden of fractures, particularly hip fractures. The key remaining hurdles to overcome are engagement with primary care healthcare professionals, and the implementation of systems that facilitate and maintain the screening program. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9239944 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92399442022-06-30 Is it time to consider population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women? A position paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Epidemiology/Quality of Life Working Group Chotiyarnwong, P. McCloskey, E. V. Harvey, N. C. Lorentzon, M. Prieto-Alhambra, D. Abrahamsen, B. Adachi, J. D. Borgström, F. Bruyere, O. Carey, J. J. Clark, P. Cooper, C. Curtis, E. M. Dennison, E. Diaz-Curiel, M. Dimai, H. P. Grigorie, D. Hiligsmann, M. Khashayar, P. Lewiecki, E. M. Lips, P. Lorenc, R. S. Ortolani, S. Papaioannou, A. Silverman, S. Sosa, M. Szulc, P. Ward, K. A. Yoshimura, N. Kanis, J. A. Arch Osteoporos Position Paper SUMMARY: The IOF Epidemiology and Quality of Life Working Group has reviewed the potential role of population screening for high hip fracture risk against well-established criteria. The report concludes that such an approach should strongly be considered in many health care systems to reduce the burden of hip fractures. INTRODUCTION: The burden of long-term osteoporosis management falls on primary care in most healthcare systems. However, a wide and stable treatment gap exists in many such settings; most of which appears to be secondary to a lack of awareness of fracture risk. Screening is a public health measure for the purpose of identifying individuals who are likely to benefit from further investigations and/or treatment to reduce the risk of a disease or its complications. The purpose of this report was to review the evidence for a potential screening programme to identify postmenopausal women at increased risk of hip fracture. METHODS: The approach took well-established criteria for the development of a screening program, adapted by the UK National Screening Committee, and sought the opinion of 20 members of the International Osteoporosis Foundation’s Working Group on Epidemiology and Quality of Life as to whether each criterion was met (yes, partial or no). For each criterion, the evidence base was then reviewed and summarized. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The report concludes that evidence supports the proposal that screening for high fracture risk in primary care should strongly be considered for incorporation into many health care systems to reduce the burden of fractures, particularly hip fractures. The key remaining hurdles to overcome are engagement with primary care healthcare professionals, and the implementation of systems that facilitate and maintain the screening program. Springer London 2022-06-28 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9239944/ /pubmed/35763133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01117-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Position Paper Chotiyarnwong, P. McCloskey, E. V. Harvey, N. C. Lorentzon, M. Prieto-Alhambra, D. Abrahamsen, B. Adachi, J. D. Borgström, F. Bruyere, O. Carey, J. J. Clark, P. Cooper, C. Curtis, E. M. Dennison, E. Diaz-Curiel, M. Dimai, H. P. Grigorie, D. Hiligsmann, M. Khashayar, P. Lewiecki, E. M. Lips, P. Lorenc, R. S. Ortolani, S. Papaioannou, A. Silverman, S. Sosa, M. Szulc, P. Ward, K. A. Yoshimura, N. Kanis, J. A. Is it time to consider population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women? A position paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Epidemiology/Quality of Life Working Group |
title | Is it time to consider population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women? A position paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Epidemiology/Quality of Life Working Group |
title_full | Is it time to consider population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women? A position paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Epidemiology/Quality of Life Working Group |
title_fullStr | Is it time to consider population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women? A position paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Epidemiology/Quality of Life Working Group |
title_full_unstemmed | Is it time to consider population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women? A position paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Epidemiology/Quality of Life Working Group |
title_short | Is it time to consider population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women? A position paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Epidemiology/Quality of Life Working Group |
title_sort | is it time to consider population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women? a position paper from the international osteoporosis foundation epidemiology/quality of life working group |
topic | Position Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9239944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35763133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01117-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chotiyarnwongp isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT mccloskeyev isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT harveync isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT lorentzonm isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT prietoalhambrad isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT abrahamsenb isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT adachijd isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT borgstromf isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT bruyereo isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT careyjj isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT clarkp isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT cooperc isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT curtisem isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT dennisone isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT diazcurielm isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT dimaihp isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT grigoried isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT hiligsmannm isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT khashayarp isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT lewieckiem isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT lipsp isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT lorencrs isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT ortolanis isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT papaioannoua isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT silvermans isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT sosam isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT szulcp isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT wardka isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT yoshimuran isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup AT kanisja isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup |