Cargando…

Is it time to consider population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women? A position paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Epidemiology/Quality of Life Working Group

SUMMARY: The IOF Epidemiology and Quality of Life Working Group has reviewed the potential role of population screening for high hip fracture risk against well-established criteria. The report concludes that such an approach should strongly be considered in many health care systems to reduce the bur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chotiyarnwong, P., McCloskey, E. V., Harvey, N. C., Lorentzon, M., Prieto-Alhambra, D., Abrahamsen, B., Adachi, J. D., Borgström, F., Bruyere, O., Carey, J. J., Clark, P., Cooper, C., Curtis, E. M., Dennison, E., Diaz-Curiel, M., Dimai, H. P., Grigorie, D., Hiligsmann, M., Khashayar, P., Lewiecki, E. M., Lips, P., Lorenc, R. S., Ortolani, S., Papaioannou, A., Silverman, S., Sosa, M., Szulc, P., Ward, K. A., Yoshimura, N., Kanis, J. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9239944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35763133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01117-6
_version_ 1784737426152882176
author Chotiyarnwong, P.
McCloskey, E. V.
Harvey, N. C.
Lorentzon, M.
Prieto-Alhambra, D.
Abrahamsen, B.
Adachi, J. D.
Borgström, F.
Bruyere, O.
Carey, J. J.
Clark, P.
Cooper, C.
Curtis, E. M.
Dennison, E.
Diaz-Curiel, M.
Dimai, H. P.
Grigorie, D.
Hiligsmann, M.
Khashayar, P.
Lewiecki, E. M.
Lips, P.
Lorenc, R. S.
Ortolani, S.
Papaioannou, A.
Silverman, S.
Sosa, M.
Szulc, P.
Ward, K. A.
Yoshimura, N.
Kanis, J. A.
author_facet Chotiyarnwong, P.
McCloskey, E. V.
Harvey, N. C.
Lorentzon, M.
Prieto-Alhambra, D.
Abrahamsen, B.
Adachi, J. D.
Borgström, F.
Bruyere, O.
Carey, J. J.
Clark, P.
Cooper, C.
Curtis, E. M.
Dennison, E.
Diaz-Curiel, M.
Dimai, H. P.
Grigorie, D.
Hiligsmann, M.
Khashayar, P.
Lewiecki, E. M.
Lips, P.
Lorenc, R. S.
Ortolani, S.
Papaioannou, A.
Silverman, S.
Sosa, M.
Szulc, P.
Ward, K. A.
Yoshimura, N.
Kanis, J. A.
author_sort Chotiyarnwong, P.
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY: The IOF Epidemiology and Quality of Life Working Group has reviewed the potential role of population screening for high hip fracture risk against well-established criteria. The report concludes that such an approach should strongly be considered in many health care systems to reduce the burden of hip fractures. INTRODUCTION: The burden of long-term osteoporosis management falls on primary care in most healthcare systems. However, a wide and stable treatment gap exists in many such settings; most of which appears to be secondary to a lack of awareness of fracture risk. Screening is a public health measure for the purpose of identifying individuals who are likely to benefit from further investigations and/or treatment to reduce the risk of a disease or its complications. The purpose of this report was to review the evidence for a potential screening programme to identify postmenopausal women at increased risk of hip fracture. METHODS: The approach took well-established criteria for the development of a screening program, adapted by the UK National Screening Committee, and sought the opinion of 20 members of the International Osteoporosis Foundation’s Working Group on Epidemiology and Quality of Life as to whether each criterion was met (yes, partial or no). For each criterion, the evidence base was then reviewed and summarized. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The report concludes that evidence supports the proposal that screening for high fracture risk in primary care should strongly be considered for incorporation into many health care systems to reduce the burden of fractures, particularly hip fractures. The key remaining hurdles to overcome are engagement with primary care healthcare professionals, and the implementation of systems that facilitate and maintain the screening program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9239944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92399442022-06-30 Is it time to consider population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women? A position paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Epidemiology/Quality of Life Working Group Chotiyarnwong, P. McCloskey, E. V. Harvey, N. C. Lorentzon, M. Prieto-Alhambra, D. Abrahamsen, B. Adachi, J. D. Borgström, F. Bruyere, O. Carey, J. J. Clark, P. Cooper, C. Curtis, E. M. Dennison, E. Diaz-Curiel, M. Dimai, H. P. Grigorie, D. Hiligsmann, M. Khashayar, P. Lewiecki, E. M. Lips, P. Lorenc, R. S. Ortolani, S. Papaioannou, A. Silverman, S. Sosa, M. Szulc, P. Ward, K. A. Yoshimura, N. Kanis, J. A. Arch Osteoporos Position Paper SUMMARY: The IOF Epidemiology and Quality of Life Working Group has reviewed the potential role of population screening for high hip fracture risk against well-established criteria. The report concludes that such an approach should strongly be considered in many health care systems to reduce the burden of hip fractures. INTRODUCTION: The burden of long-term osteoporosis management falls on primary care in most healthcare systems. However, a wide and stable treatment gap exists in many such settings; most of which appears to be secondary to a lack of awareness of fracture risk. Screening is a public health measure for the purpose of identifying individuals who are likely to benefit from further investigations and/or treatment to reduce the risk of a disease or its complications. The purpose of this report was to review the evidence for a potential screening programme to identify postmenopausal women at increased risk of hip fracture. METHODS: The approach took well-established criteria for the development of a screening program, adapted by the UK National Screening Committee, and sought the opinion of 20 members of the International Osteoporosis Foundation’s Working Group on Epidemiology and Quality of Life as to whether each criterion was met (yes, partial or no). For each criterion, the evidence base was then reviewed and summarized. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The report concludes that evidence supports the proposal that screening for high fracture risk in primary care should strongly be considered for incorporation into many health care systems to reduce the burden of fractures, particularly hip fractures. The key remaining hurdles to overcome are engagement with primary care healthcare professionals, and the implementation of systems that facilitate and maintain the screening program. Springer London 2022-06-28 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9239944/ /pubmed/35763133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01117-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Position Paper
Chotiyarnwong, P.
McCloskey, E. V.
Harvey, N. C.
Lorentzon, M.
Prieto-Alhambra, D.
Abrahamsen, B.
Adachi, J. D.
Borgström, F.
Bruyere, O.
Carey, J. J.
Clark, P.
Cooper, C.
Curtis, E. M.
Dennison, E.
Diaz-Curiel, M.
Dimai, H. P.
Grigorie, D.
Hiligsmann, M.
Khashayar, P.
Lewiecki, E. M.
Lips, P.
Lorenc, R. S.
Ortolani, S.
Papaioannou, A.
Silverman, S.
Sosa, M.
Szulc, P.
Ward, K. A.
Yoshimura, N.
Kanis, J. A.
Is it time to consider population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women? A position paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Epidemiology/Quality of Life Working Group
title Is it time to consider population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women? A position paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Epidemiology/Quality of Life Working Group
title_full Is it time to consider population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women? A position paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Epidemiology/Quality of Life Working Group
title_fullStr Is it time to consider population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women? A position paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Epidemiology/Quality of Life Working Group
title_full_unstemmed Is it time to consider population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women? A position paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Epidemiology/Quality of Life Working Group
title_short Is it time to consider population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women? A position paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Epidemiology/Quality of Life Working Group
title_sort is it time to consider population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women? a position paper from the international osteoporosis foundation epidemiology/quality of life working group
topic Position Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9239944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35763133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01117-6
work_keys_str_mv AT chotiyarnwongp isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT mccloskeyev isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT harveync isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT lorentzonm isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT prietoalhambrad isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT abrahamsenb isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT adachijd isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT borgstromf isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT bruyereo isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT careyjj isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT clarkp isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT cooperc isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT curtisem isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT dennisone isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT diazcurielm isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT dimaihp isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT grigoried isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT hiligsmannm isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT khashayarp isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT lewieckiem isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT lipsp isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT lorencrs isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT ortolanis isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT papaioannoua isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT silvermans isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT sosam isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT szulcp isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT wardka isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT yoshimuran isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup
AT kanisja isittimetoconsiderpopulationscreeningforfractureriskinpostmenopausalwomenapositionpaperfromtheinternationalosteoporosisfoundationepidemiologyqualityoflifeworkinggroup