Cargando…
COVID-19 due to the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant compared to B.1.1.7 (Alpha) variant of SARS-CoV-2: a prospective observational cohort study
The Delta (B.1.617.2) variant was the predominant UK circulating SARS-CoV-2 strain between May and December 2021. How Delta infection compares with previous variants is unknown. This prospective observational cohort study assessed symptomatic adults participating in the app-based COVID Symptom Study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9240087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35764879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14016-0 |
_version_ | 1784737464074633216 |
---|---|
author | Kläser, Kerstin Molteni, Erika Graham, Mark Canas, Liane S. Österdahl, Marc F. Antonelli, Michela Chen, Liyuan Deng, Jie Murray, Benjamin Kerfoot, Eric Wolf, Jonathan May, Anna Fox, Ben Capdevila, Joan Modat, Marc Hammers, Alexander Spector, Tim D. Steves, Claire J. Sudre, Carole H. Ourselin, Sebastien Duncan, Emma L. |
author_facet | Kläser, Kerstin Molteni, Erika Graham, Mark Canas, Liane S. Österdahl, Marc F. Antonelli, Michela Chen, Liyuan Deng, Jie Murray, Benjamin Kerfoot, Eric Wolf, Jonathan May, Anna Fox, Ben Capdevila, Joan Modat, Marc Hammers, Alexander Spector, Tim D. Steves, Claire J. Sudre, Carole H. Ourselin, Sebastien Duncan, Emma L. |
author_sort | Kläser, Kerstin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Delta (B.1.617.2) variant was the predominant UK circulating SARS-CoV-2 strain between May and December 2021. How Delta infection compares with previous variants is unknown. This prospective observational cohort study assessed symptomatic adults participating in the app-based COVID Symptom Study who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 from May 26 to July 1, 2021 (Delta overwhelmingly the predominant circulating UK variant), compared (1:1, age- and sex-matched) with individuals presenting from December 28, 2020 to May 6, 2021 (Alpha (B.1.1.7) the predominant variant). We assessed illness (symptoms, duration, presentation to hospital) during Alpha- and Delta-predominant timeframes; and transmission, reinfection, and vaccine effectiveness during the Delta-predominant period. 3581 individuals (aged 18 to 100 years) from each timeframe were assessed. The seven most frequent symptoms were common to both variants. Within the first 28 days of illness, some symptoms were more common with Delta versus Alpha infection (including fever, sore throat, and headache) and some vice versa (dyspnoea). Symptom burden in the first week was higher with Delta versus Alpha infection; however, the odds of any given symptom lasting ≥ 7 days was either lower or unchanged. Illness duration ≥ 28 days was lower with Delta versus Alpha infection, though unchanged in unvaccinated individuals. Hospitalisation for COVID-19 was unchanged. The Delta variant appeared more (1.49) transmissible than Alpha. Re-infections were low in all UK regions. Vaccination markedly reduced the risk of Delta infection (by 69-84%). We conclude that COVID-19 from Delta or Alpha infections is similar. The Delta variant is more transmissible than Alpha; however, current vaccines showed good efficacy against disease. This research framework can be useful for future comparisons with new emerging variants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9240087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92400872022-06-30 COVID-19 due to the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant compared to B.1.1.7 (Alpha) variant of SARS-CoV-2: a prospective observational cohort study Kläser, Kerstin Molteni, Erika Graham, Mark Canas, Liane S. Österdahl, Marc F. Antonelli, Michela Chen, Liyuan Deng, Jie Murray, Benjamin Kerfoot, Eric Wolf, Jonathan May, Anna Fox, Ben Capdevila, Joan Modat, Marc Hammers, Alexander Spector, Tim D. Steves, Claire J. Sudre, Carole H. Ourselin, Sebastien Duncan, Emma L. Sci Rep Article The Delta (B.1.617.2) variant was the predominant UK circulating SARS-CoV-2 strain between May and December 2021. How Delta infection compares with previous variants is unknown. This prospective observational cohort study assessed symptomatic adults participating in the app-based COVID Symptom Study who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 from May 26 to July 1, 2021 (Delta overwhelmingly the predominant circulating UK variant), compared (1:1, age- and sex-matched) with individuals presenting from December 28, 2020 to May 6, 2021 (Alpha (B.1.1.7) the predominant variant). We assessed illness (symptoms, duration, presentation to hospital) during Alpha- and Delta-predominant timeframes; and transmission, reinfection, and vaccine effectiveness during the Delta-predominant period. 3581 individuals (aged 18 to 100 years) from each timeframe were assessed. The seven most frequent symptoms were common to both variants. Within the first 28 days of illness, some symptoms were more common with Delta versus Alpha infection (including fever, sore throat, and headache) and some vice versa (dyspnoea). Symptom burden in the first week was higher with Delta versus Alpha infection; however, the odds of any given symptom lasting ≥ 7 days was either lower or unchanged. Illness duration ≥ 28 days was lower with Delta versus Alpha infection, though unchanged in unvaccinated individuals. Hospitalisation for COVID-19 was unchanged. The Delta variant appeared more (1.49) transmissible than Alpha. Re-infections were low in all UK regions. Vaccination markedly reduced the risk of Delta infection (by 69-84%). We conclude that COVID-19 from Delta or Alpha infections is similar. The Delta variant is more transmissible than Alpha; however, current vaccines showed good efficacy against disease. This research framework can be useful for future comparisons with new emerging variants. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9240087/ /pubmed/35764879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14016-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Kläser, Kerstin Molteni, Erika Graham, Mark Canas, Liane S. Österdahl, Marc F. Antonelli, Michela Chen, Liyuan Deng, Jie Murray, Benjamin Kerfoot, Eric Wolf, Jonathan May, Anna Fox, Ben Capdevila, Joan Modat, Marc Hammers, Alexander Spector, Tim D. Steves, Claire J. Sudre, Carole H. Ourselin, Sebastien Duncan, Emma L. COVID-19 due to the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant compared to B.1.1.7 (Alpha) variant of SARS-CoV-2: a prospective observational cohort study |
title | COVID-19 due to the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant compared to B.1.1.7 (Alpha) variant of SARS-CoV-2: a prospective observational cohort study |
title_full | COVID-19 due to the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant compared to B.1.1.7 (Alpha) variant of SARS-CoV-2: a prospective observational cohort study |
title_fullStr | COVID-19 due to the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant compared to B.1.1.7 (Alpha) variant of SARS-CoV-2: a prospective observational cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 due to the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant compared to B.1.1.7 (Alpha) variant of SARS-CoV-2: a prospective observational cohort study |
title_short | COVID-19 due to the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant compared to B.1.1.7 (Alpha) variant of SARS-CoV-2: a prospective observational cohort study |
title_sort | covid-19 due to the b.1.617.2 (delta) variant compared to b.1.1.7 (alpha) variant of sars-cov-2: a prospective observational cohort study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9240087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35764879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14016-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klaserkerstin covid19duetotheb16172deltavariantcomparedtob117alphavariantofsarscov2aprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT moltenierika covid19duetotheb16172deltavariantcomparedtob117alphavariantofsarscov2aprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT grahammark covid19duetotheb16172deltavariantcomparedtob117alphavariantofsarscov2aprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT canaslianes covid19duetotheb16172deltavariantcomparedtob117alphavariantofsarscov2aprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT osterdahlmarcf covid19duetotheb16172deltavariantcomparedtob117alphavariantofsarscov2aprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT antonellimichela covid19duetotheb16172deltavariantcomparedtob117alphavariantofsarscov2aprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT chenliyuan covid19duetotheb16172deltavariantcomparedtob117alphavariantofsarscov2aprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT dengjie covid19duetotheb16172deltavariantcomparedtob117alphavariantofsarscov2aprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT murraybenjamin covid19duetotheb16172deltavariantcomparedtob117alphavariantofsarscov2aprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT kerfooteric covid19duetotheb16172deltavariantcomparedtob117alphavariantofsarscov2aprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT wolfjonathan covid19duetotheb16172deltavariantcomparedtob117alphavariantofsarscov2aprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT mayanna covid19duetotheb16172deltavariantcomparedtob117alphavariantofsarscov2aprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT foxben covid19duetotheb16172deltavariantcomparedtob117alphavariantofsarscov2aprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT capdevilajoan covid19duetotheb16172deltavariantcomparedtob117alphavariantofsarscov2aprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT covid19duetotheb16172deltavariantcomparedtob117alphavariantofsarscov2aprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT modatmarc covid19duetotheb16172deltavariantcomparedtob117alphavariantofsarscov2aprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT hammersalexander covid19duetotheb16172deltavariantcomparedtob117alphavariantofsarscov2aprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT spectortimd covid19duetotheb16172deltavariantcomparedtob117alphavariantofsarscov2aprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT stevesclairej covid19duetotheb16172deltavariantcomparedtob117alphavariantofsarscov2aprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT sudrecaroleh covid19duetotheb16172deltavariantcomparedtob117alphavariantofsarscov2aprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT ourselinsebastien covid19duetotheb16172deltavariantcomparedtob117alphavariantofsarscov2aprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT duncanemmal covid19duetotheb16172deltavariantcomparedtob117alphavariantofsarscov2aprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy |