Cargando…
Phase 1, dose-escalation study of guadecitabine (SGI-110) in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with solid tumors
BACKGROUND: Data suggest that immunomodulation induced by DNA hypomethylating agents can sensitize tumors to immune checkpoint inhibitors. We conducted a phase 1 dose-escalation trial (NCT02998567) of guadecitabine and pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. We hypothesized that guadec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9240883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35717027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-004495 |
_version_ | 1784737664370475008 |
---|---|
author | Papadatos-Pastos, Dionysis Yuan, Wei Pal, Abhijit Crespo, Mateus Ferreira, Ana Gurel, Bora Prout, Toby Ameratunga, Malaka Chénard-Poirier, Maxime Curcean, Andra Bertan, Claudia Baker, Chloe Miranda, Susana Masrour, Nahal Chen, Wentin Pereira, Rita Figueiredo, Ines Morilla, Ricardo Jenkins, Ben Zachariou, Anna Riisnaes, Ruth Parmar, Mona Turner, Alison Carreira, Suzanne Yap, Christina Brown, Robert Tunariu, Nina Banerji, Udai Lopez, Juanita de Bono, Johann Minchom, Anna |
author_facet | Papadatos-Pastos, Dionysis Yuan, Wei Pal, Abhijit Crespo, Mateus Ferreira, Ana Gurel, Bora Prout, Toby Ameratunga, Malaka Chénard-Poirier, Maxime Curcean, Andra Bertan, Claudia Baker, Chloe Miranda, Susana Masrour, Nahal Chen, Wentin Pereira, Rita Figueiredo, Ines Morilla, Ricardo Jenkins, Ben Zachariou, Anna Riisnaes, Ruth Parmar, Mona Turner, Alison Carreira, Suzanne Yap, Christina Brown, Robert Tunariu, Nina Banerji, Udai Lopez, Juanita de Bono, Johann Minchom, Anna |
author_sort | Papadatos-Pastos, Dionysis |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Data suggest that immunomodulation induced by DNA hypomethylating agents can sensitize tumors to immune checkpoint inhibitors. We conducted a phase 1 dose-escalation trial (NCT02998567) of guadecitabine and pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. We hypothesized that guadecitabine will overcome pembrolizumab resistance. METHODS: Patients received guadecitabine (45 mg/m(2) or 30 mg/m(2), administered subcutaneously on days 1–4), with pembrolizumab (200 mg administered intravenously starting from cycle 2 onwards) every 3 weeks. Primary endpoints were safety, tolerability and maximum tolerated dose; secondary and exploratory endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), changes in methylome, transcriptome, immune contextures in pre-treatment and on-treatment tumor biopsies. RESULTS: Between January 2017 and January 2020, 34 patients were enrolled. The recommended phase II dose was guadecitabine 30 mg/m(2), days 1–4, and pembrolizumab 200 mg on day 1 every 3 weeks. Two dose-limiting toxicities (neutropenia, febrile neutropenia) were reported at guadecitabine 45 mg/m(2) with none reported at guadecitabine 30 mg/m(2). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were neutropenia (58.8%), fatigue (17.6%), febrile neutropenia (11.8%) and nausea (11.8%). Common, grade 3+ TRAEs were neutropaenia (38.2%) and febrile neutropaenia (11.8%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Overall, 30 patients were evaluable for antitumor activity; ORR was 7% with 37% achieving disease control (progression-free survival) for ≥24 weeks. Of 12 evaluable patients with non-small cell lung cancer, 10 had been previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors with 5 (42%) having disease control ≥24 weeks (clinical benefit). Reduction in LINE-1 DNA methylation following treatment in blood (peripheral blood mononuclear cells) and tissue samples was demonstrated and methylation at transcriptional start site and 5’ untranslated region gene regions showed enriched negative correlation with gene expression. Increases in intra-tumoural effector T-cells were seen in some responding patients. Patients having clinical benefit had high baseline inflammatory signature on RNAseq analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Guadecitabine in combination with pembrolizumab is tolerable with biological and anticancer activity. Reversal of previous resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors is demonstrated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9240883 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92408832022-07-20 Phase 1, dose-escalation study of guadecitabine (SGI-110) in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with solid tumors Papadatos-Pastos, Dionysis Yuan, Wei Pal, Abhijit Crespo, Mateus Ferreira, Ana Gurel, Bora Prout, Toby Ameratunga, Malaka Chénard-Poirier, Maxime Curcean, Andra Bertan, Claudia Baker, Chloe Miranda, Susana Masrour, Nahal Chen, Wentin Pereira, Rita Figueiredo, Ines Morilla, Ricardo Jenkins, Ben Zachariou, Anna Riisnaes, Ruth Parmar, Mona Turner, Alison Carreira, Suzanne Yap, Christina Brown, Robert Tunariu, Nina Banerji, Udai Lopez, Juanita de Bono, Johann Minchom, Anna J Immunother Cancer Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy BACKGROUND: Data suggest that immunomodulation induced by DNA hypomethylating agents can sensitize tumors to immune checkpoint inhibitors. We conducted a phase 1 dose-escalation trial (NCT02998567) of guadecitabine and pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. We hypothesized that guadecitabine will overcome pembrolizumab resistance. METHODS: Patients received guadecitabine (45 mg/m(2) or 30 mg/m(2), administered subcutaneously on days 1–4), with pembrolizumab (200 mg administered intravenously starting from cycle 2 onwards) every 3 weeks. Primary endpoints were safety, tolerability and maximum tolerated dose; secondary and exploratory endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), changes in methylome, transcriptome, immune contextures in pre-treatment and on-treatment tumor biopsies. RESULTS: Between January 2017 and January 2020, 34 patients were enrolled. The recommended phase II dose was guadecitabine 30 mg/m(2), days 1–4, and pembrolizumab 200 mg on day 1 every 3 weeks. Two dose-limiting toxicities (neutropenia, febrile neutropenia) were reported at guadecitabine 45 mg/m(2) with none reported at guadecitabine 30 mg/m(2). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were neutropenia (58.8%), fatigue (17.6%), febrile neutropenia (11.8%) and nausea (11.8%). Common, grade 3+ TRAEs were neutropaenia (38.2%) and febrile neutropaenia (11.8%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Overall, 30 patients were evaluable for antitumor activity; ORR was 7% with 37% achieving disease control (progression-free survival) for ≥24 weeks. Of 12 evaluable patients with non-small cell lung cancer, 10 had been previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors with 5 (42%) having disease control ≥24 weeks (clinical benefit). Reduction in LINE-1 DNA methylation following treatment in blood (peripheral blood mononuclear cells) and tissue samples was demonstrated and methylation at transcriptional start site and 5’ untranslated region gene regions showed enriched negative correlation with gene expression. Increases in intra-tumoural effector T-cells were seen in some responding patients. Patients having clinical benefit had high baseline inflammatory signature on RNAseq analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Guadecitabine in combination with pembrolizumab is tolerable with biological and anticancer activity. Reversal of previous resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors is demonstrated. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9240883/ /pubmed/35717027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-004495 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy Papadatos-Pastos, Dionysis Yuan, Wei Pal, Abhijit Crespo, Mateus Ferreira, Ana Gurel, Bora Prout, Toby Ameratunga, Malaka Chénard-Poirier, Maxime Curcean, Andra Bertan, Claudia Baker, Chloe Miranda, Susana Masrour, Nahal Chen, Wentin Pereira, Rita Figueiredo, Ines Morilla, Ricardo Jenkins, Ben Zachariou, Anna Riisnaes, Ruth Parmar, Mona Turner, Alison Carreira, Suzanne Yap, Christina Brown, Robert Tunariu, Nina Banerji, Udai Lopez, Juanita de Bono, Johann Minchom, Anna Phase 1, dose-escalation study of guadecitabine (SGI-110) in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with solid tumors |
title | Phase 1, dose-escalation study of guadecitabine (SGI-110) in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with solid tumors |
title_full | Phase 1, dose-escalation study of guadecitabine (SGI-110) in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with solid tumors |
title_fullStr | Phase 1, dose-escalation study of guadecitabine (SGI-110) in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with solid tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | Phase 1, dose-escalation study of guadecitabine (SGI-110) in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with solid tumors |
title_short | Phase 1, dose-escalation study of guadecitabine (SGI-110) in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with solid tumors |
title_sort | phase 1, dose-escalation study of guadecitabine (sgi-110) in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with solid tumors |
topic | Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9240883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35717027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-004495 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT papadatospastosdionysis phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT yuanwei phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT palabhijit phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT crespomateus phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT ferreiraana phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT gurelbora phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT prouttoby phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT ameratungamalaka phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT chenardpoiriermaxime phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT curceanandra phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT bertanclaudia phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT bakerchloe phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT mirandasusana phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT masrournahal phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT chenwentin phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT pereirarita phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT figueiredoines phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT morillaricardo phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT jenkinsben phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT zachariouanna phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT riisnaesruth phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT parmarmona phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT turneralison phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT carreirasuzanne phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT yapchristina phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT brownrobert phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT tunariunina phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT banerjiudai phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT lopezjuanita phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT debonojohann phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors AT minchomanna phase1doseescalationstudyofguadecitabinesgi110incombinationwithpembrolizumabinpatientswithsolidtumors |