Cargando…

Muscarinic receptor antagonists and airway inflammation: A systematic review on pharmacological models

Airway inflammation is crucial in the pathogenesis of many respiratory diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. Current evidence supports the beneficial impact of muscarinic receptor antagonists against airway inflammation from bench-to-bedside. Considering the nu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calzetta, Luigino, Pistocchini, Elena, Ritondo, Beatrice Ludovica, Cavalli, Francesco, Camardelli, Francesca, Rogliani, Paola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9240991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35785239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09760
_version_ 1784737692521594880
author Calzetta, Luigino
Pistocchini, Elena
Ritondo, Beatrice Ludovica
Cavalli, Francesco
Camardelli, Francesca
Rogliani, Paola
author_facet Calzetta, Luigino
Pistocchini, Elena
Ritondo, Beatrice Ludovica
Cavalli, Francesco
Camardelli, Francesca
Rogliani, Paola
author_sort Calzetta, Luigino
collection PubMed
description Airway inflammation is crucial in the pathogenesis of many respiratory diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. Current evidence supports the beneficial impact of muscarinic receptor antagonists against airway inflammation from bench-to-bedside. Considering the numerous sampling approaches and the ethical implications required to study inflammation in vivo in patients, the use of pre-clinical models is inevitable. Starting from our recently published systematic review concerning the impact of muscarinic antagonists, we have systematically assessed the current pharmacological models of airway inflammation and provided an overview on the advances in in vitro and ex vivo approaches. The purpose of in vitro models is to recapitulate selected pathophysiological parameters or processes that are crucial to the development of new drugs within a controlled environment. Nevertheless, immortalized cell lines or primary airway cells present major limitations, including the inability to fully replicate the conditions of the corresponding cell types within a whole organism. Induced animal models are extensively used in research in the attempt to replicate a respiratory condition reflective of a human pathological state, although considering animal models with spontaneously occurring respiratory diseases may be more appropriate since most of the clinical features are accompanied by lung pathology resembling that of the human condition. In recent years, three-dimensional organoids have become an alternative to animal experiments, also because animal models are unable to fully mimic the complexity of human pulmonary diseases. Ex vivo studies performed on human isolated airways have a superior translational value compared to in vitro and animal models, as they retain the morphology and the microenvironment of the lung in vivo. In the foreseeable future, greater effort should be undertaken to rely on more physiologically relevant models, that provide translational value into clinic and have a direct impact on patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9240991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92409912022-06-30 Muscarinic receptor antagonists and airway inflammation: A systematic review on pharmacological models Calzetta, Luigino Pistocchini, Elena Ritondo, Beatrice Ludovica Cavalli, Francesco Camardelli, Francesca Rogliani, Paola Heliyon Review Article Airway inflammation is crucial in the pathogenesis of many respiratory diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. Current evidence supports the beneficial impact of muscarinic receptor antagonists against airway inflammation from bench-to-bedside. Considering the numerous sampling approaches and the ethical implications required to study inflammation in vivo in patients, the use of pre-clinical models is inevitable. Starting from our recently published systematic review concerning the impact of muscarinic antagonists, we have systematically assessed the current pharmacological models of airway inflammation and provided an overview on the advances in in vitro and ex vivo approaches. The purpose of in vitro models is to recapitulate selected pathophysiological parameters or processes that are crucial to the development of new drugs within a controlled environment. Nevertheless, immortalized cell lines or primary airway cells present major limitations, including the inability to fully replicate the conditions of the corresponding cell types within a whole organism. Induced animal models are extensively used in research in the attempt to replicate a respiratory condition reflective of a human pathological state, although considering animal models with spontaneously occurring respiratory diseases may be more appropriate since most of the clinical features are accompanied by lung pathology resembling that of the human condition. In recent years, three-dimensional organoids have become an alternative to animal experiments, also because animal models are unable to fully mimic the complexity of human pulmonary diseases. Ex vivo studies performed on human isolated airways have a superior translational value compared to in vitro and animal models, as they retain the morphology and the microenvironment of the lung in vivo. In the foreseeable future, greater effort should be undertaken to rely on more physiologically relevant models, that provide translational value into clinic and have a direct impact on patient outcomes. Elsevier 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9240991/ /pubmed/35785239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09760 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Calzetta, Luigino
Pistocchini, Elena
Ritondo, Beatrice Ludovica
Cavalli, Francesco
Camardelli, Francesca
Rogliani, Paola
Muscarinic receptor antagonists and airway inflammation: A systematic review on pharmacological models
title Muscarinic receptor antagonists and airway inflammation: A systematic review on pharmacological models
title_full Muscarinic receptor antagonists and airway inflammation: A systematic review on pharmacological models
title_fullStr Muscarinic receptor antagonists and airway inflammation: A systematic review on pharmacological models
title_full_unstemmed Muscarinic receptor antagonists and airway inflammation: A systematic review on pharmacological models
title_short Muscarinic receptor antagonists and airway inflammation: A systematic review on pharmacological models
title_sort muscarinic receptor antagonists and airway inflammation: a systematic review on pharmacological models
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9240991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35785239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09760
work_keys_str_mv AT calzettaluigino muscarinicreceptorantagonistsandairwayinflammationasystematicreviewonpharmacologicalmodels
AT pistocchinielena muscarinicreceptorantagonistsandairwayinflammationasystematicreviewonpharmacologicalmodels
AT ritondobeatriceludovica muscarinicreceptorantagonistsandairwayinflammationasystematicreviewonpharmacologicalmodels
AT cavallifrancesco muscarinicreceptorantagonistsandairwayinflammationasystematicreviewonpharmacologicalmodels
AT camardellifrancesca muscarinicreceptorantagonistsandairwayinflammationasystematicreviewonpharmacologicalmodels
AT roglianipaola muscarinicreceptorantagonistsandairwayinflammationasystematicreviewonpharmacologicalmodels