Cargando…

Research Note: Choice of microbiota database affects data analysis and interpretation in chicken cecal microbiota

The chicken microbiota is often analyzed to address questions about the effects of diet or disease on poultry health. To analyze the microbiota, bioinformatic platforms such as QIIME 2 and mothur are used, which incorporate public taxonomic databases such as Greengenes, the ribosomal database projec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campos, Philip M., Darwish, Nadia, Shao, Jonathan, Proszkowiec-Weglarz, Monika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9241040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35759996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101971
_version_ 1784737706266329088
author Campos, Philip M.
Darwish, Nadia
Shao, Jonathan
Proszkowiec-Weglarz, Monika
author_facet Campos, Philip M.
Darwish, Nadia
Shao, Jonathan
Proszkowiec-Weglarz, Monika
author_sort Campos, Philip M.
collection PubMed
description The chicken microbiota is often analyzed to address questions about the effects of diet or disease on poultry health. To analyze the microbiota, bioinformatic platforms such as QIIME 2 and mothur are used, which incorporate public taxonomic databases such as Greengenes, the ribosomal database project (RDP), and SILVA to assign taxonomies to bacterial sequences. Many chicken microbiota studies continue to incorporate the Greengenes database, which has not been updated since 2013. To determine whether a choice of database could affect results, this study compared the results of bioinformatic analyses obtained using the Greengenes, RDP, and SILVA databases on a cecal luminal microbiome dataset. The QIIME 2 platform was used to process 16S bacterial sequences and assign taxonomies with Greengenes, RDP, and SILVA. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) was performed, allowing for the comparison of taxonomies considered significantly differentially abundant between the three databases. Some notable differences between databases were observed in results, in particular the ability of SILVA database to classify members of the family Lachnospiraceae into separate genera, while these members remained in one group of unclassified Lachnospiraceae through Greengenes and RDP. LEfSe analyses showed that the SILVA database produced more differentially abundant genera, in large part due to the classification of these separate Lachnospiraceae genera. Additionally, the relative abundance of unclassified Lachnospiraceae in SILVA results was significantly lower than in RDP results. Our results show the choice of taxonomic database can influence the results of a microbiota study at the genus level, potentially affecting the interpretation of the results. The use of the SILVA database is recommended over Greengenes in chicken microbiota studies, as more specific classifications at the genus level may provide more accurate interpretations of changes in the microbiota.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9241040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92410402022-06-30 Research Note: Choice of microbiota database affects data analysis and interpretation in chicken cecal microbiota Campos, Philip M. Darwish, Nadia Shao, Jonathan Proszkowiec-Weglarz, Monika Poult Sci MICROBIOLOGY AND FOOD SAFETY The chicken microbiota is often analyzed to address questions about the effects of diet or disease on poultry health. To analyze the microbiota, bioinformatic platforms such as QIIME 2 and mothur are used, which incorporate public taxonomic databases such as Greengenes, the ribosomal database project (RDP), and SILVA to assign taxonomies to bacterial sequences. Many chicken microbiota studies continue to incorporate the Greengenes database, which has not been updated since 2013. To determine whether a choice of database could affect results, this study compared the results of bioinformatic analyses obtained using the Greengenes, RDP, and SILVA databases on a cecal luminal microbiome dataset. The QIIME 2 platform was used to process 16S bacterial sequences and assign taxonomies with Greengenes, RDP, and SILVA. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) was performed, allowing for the comparison of taxonomies considered significantly differentially abundant between the three databases. Some notable differences between databases were observed in results, in particular the ability of SILVA database to classify members of the family Lachnospiraceae into separate genera, while these members remained in one group of unclassified Lachnospiraceae through Greengenes and RDP. LEfSe analyses showed that the SILVA database produced more differentially abundant genera, in large part due to the classification of these separate Lachnospiraceae genera. Additionally, the relative abundance of unclassified Lachnospiraceae in SILVA results was significantly lower than in RDP results. Our results show the choice of taxonomic database can influence the results of a microbiota study at the genus level, potentially affecting the interpretation of the results. The use of the SILVA database is recommended over Greengenes in chicken microbiota studies, as more specific classifications at the genus level may provide more accurate interpretations of changes in the microbiota. Elsevier 2022-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9241040/ /pubmed/35759996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101971 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle MICROBIOLOGY AND FOOD SAFETY
Campos, Philip M.
Darwish, Nadia
Shao, Jonathan
Proszkowiec-Weglarz, Monika
Research Note: Choice of microbiota database affects data analysis and interpretation in chicken cecal microbiota
title Research Note: Choice of microbiota database affects data analysis and interpretation in chicken cecal microbiota
title_full Research Note: Choice of microbiota database affects data analysis and interpretation in chicken cecal microbiota
title_fullStr Research Note: Choice of microbiota database affects data analysis and interpretation in chicken cecal microbiota
title_full_unstemmed Research Note: Choice of microbiota database affects data analysis and interpretation in chicken cecal microbiota
title_short Research Note: Choice of microbiota database affects data analysis and interpretation in chicken cecal microbiota
title_sort research note: choice of microbiota database affects data analysis and interpretation in chicken cecal microbiota
topic MICROBIOLOGY AND FOOD SAFETY
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9241040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35759996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101971
work_keys_str_mv AT camposphilipm researchnotechoiceofmicrobiotadatabaseaffectsdataanalysisandinterpretationinchickencecalmicrobiota
AT darwishnadia researchnotechoiceofmicrobiotadatabaseaffectsdataanalysisandinterpretationinchickencecalmicrobiota
AT shaojonathan researchnotechoiceofmicrobiotadatabaseaffectsdataanalysisandinterpretationinchickencecalmicrobiota
AT proszkowiecweglarzmonika researchnotechoiceofmicrobiotadatabaseaffectsdataanalysisandinterpretationinchickencecalmicrobiota