Cargando…
Automated versus manual B-lines counting, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral and inferior vena cava collapsibility index in COVID-19 patients
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) in point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become a very useful tool to quickly assess cardiorespiratory function in coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 patients. The objective of this study was to test the agreement between manual and a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9241188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35782660 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_1008_21 |
_version_ | 1784737742816542720 |
---|---|
author | Damodaran, Srinath Kulkarni, Anuja Vijay Gunaseelan, Vikneswaran Raj, Vimal Kanchi, Muralidhar |
author_facet | Damodaran, Srinath Kulkarni, Anuja Vijay Gunaseelan, Vikneswaran Raj, Vimal Kanchi, Muralidhar |
author_sort | Damodaran, Srinath |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) in point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become a very useful tool to quickly assess cardiorespiratory function in coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 patients. The objective of this study was to test the agreement between manual and automated B-lines counting, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT-VTI) and inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVC-CI) in suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients using AI integrated POCUS. In addition, we investigated the inter-observer, intra-observer variability and reliability of assessment of echocardiographic parameters using AI by a novice. METHODS: Two experienced sonographers in POCUS and one novice learner independently and consecutively performed ultrasound assessment of B-lines counting, LVOT-VTI and IVC-CI in 83 suspected and confirmed COVID-19 cases which included both manual and AI methods. RESULTS: Agreement between automated and manual assessment of LVOT-VTI, and IVC-CI were excellent [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.98, P < 0.001]. Intra-observer reliability and inter-observer reliability of these parameters were excellent [ICC 0.96-0.99, P < 0.001]. Moreover, agreement between novice and experts using AI for LVOT-VTI and IVC-CI assessment was also excellent [ICC 0.95-0.97, P < 0.001]. However, correlation and intra-observer reliability between automated and manual B-lines counting was moderate [(ICC) 0.52-0.53, P < 0.001] and [ICC 0.56-0.69, P < 0.001], respectively. Inter-observer reliability was good [ICC 0.79-0.87, P < 0.001]. Agreement of B-lines counting between novice and experts using AI was weak [ICC 0.18, P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: AI-guided assessment of LVOT-VTI, IVC-CI and B-lines counting is reliable and consistent with manual assessment in COVID-19 patients. Novices can reliably estimate LVOT-VTI and IVC-CI using AI software in COVID-19 patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9241188 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92411882022-06-30 Automated versus manual B-lines counting, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral and inferior vena cava collapsibility index in COVID-19 patients Damodaran, Srinath Kulkarni, Anuja Vijay Gunaseelan, Vikneswaran Raj, Vimal Kanchi, Muralidhar Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) in point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become a very useful tool to quickly assess cardiorespiratory function in coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 patients. The objective of this study was to test the agreement between manual and automated B-lines counting, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT-VTI) and inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVC-CI) in suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients using AI integrated POCUS. In addition, we investigated the inter-observer, intra-observer variability and reliability of assessment of echocardiographic parameters using AI by a novice. METHODS: Two experienced sonographers in POCUS and one novice learner independently and consecutively performed ultrasound assessment of B-lines counting, LVOT-VTI and IVC-CI in 83 suspected and confirmed COVID-19 cases which included both manual and AI methods. RESULTS: Agreement between automated and manual assessment of LVOT-VTI, and IVC-CI were excellent [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.98, P < 0.001]. Intra-observer reliability and inter-observer reliability of these parameters were excellent [ICC 0.96-0.99, P < 0.001]. Moreover, agreement between novice and experts using AI for LVOT-VTI and IVC-CI assessment was also excellent [ICC 0.95-0.97, P < 0.001]. However, correlation and intra-observer reliability between automated and manual B-lines counting was moderate [(ICC) 0.52-0.53, P < 0.001] and [ICC 0.56-0.69, P < 0.001], respectively. Inter-observer reliability was good [ICC 0.79-0.87, P < 0.001]. Agreement of B-lines counting between novice and experts using AI was weak [ICC 0.18, P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: AI-guided assessment of LVOT-VTI, IVC-CI and B-lines counting is reliable and consistent with manual assessment in COVID-19 patients. Novices can reliably estimate LVOT-VTI and IVC-CI using AI software in COVID-19 patients. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-05 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9241188/ /pubmed/35782660 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_1008_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Damodaran, Srinath Kulkarni, Anuja Vijay Gunaseelan, Vikneswaran Raj, Vimal Kanchi, Muralidhar Automated versus manual B-lines counting, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral and inferior vena cava collapsibility index in COVID-19 patients |
title | Automated versus manual B-lines counting, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral and inferior vena cava collapsibility index in COVID-19 patients |
title_full | Automated versus manual B-lines counting, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral and inferior vena cava collapsibility index in COVID-19 patients |
title_fullStr | Automated versus manual B-lines counting, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral and inferior vena cava collapsibility index in COVID-19 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated versus manual B-lines counting, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral and inferior vena cava collapsibility index in COVID-19 patients |
title_short | Automated versus manual B-lines counting, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral and inferior vena cava collapsibility index in COVID-19 patients |
title_sort | automated versus manual b-lines counting, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral and inferior vena cava collapsibility index in covid-19 patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9241188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35782660 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_1008_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT damodaransrinath automatedversusmanualblinescountingleftventricularoutflowtractvelocitytimeintegralandinferiorvenacavacollapsibilityindexincovid19patients AT kulkarnianujavijay automatedversusmanualblinescountingleftventricularoutflowtractvelocitytimeintegralandinferiorvenacavacollapsibilityindexincovid19patients AT gunaseelanvikneswaran automatedversusmanualblinescountingleftventricularoutflowtractvelocitytimeintegralandinferiorvenacavacollapsibilityindexincovid19patients AT rajvimal automatedversusmanualblinescountingleftventricularoutflowtractvelocitytimeintegralandinferiorvenacavacollapsibilityindexincovid19patients AT kanchimuralidhar automatedversusmanualblinescountingleftventricularoutflowtractvelocitytimeintegralandinferiorvenacavacollapsibilityindexincovid19patients |