Cargando…

Comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of two RIL parents with contrasting salt responsiveness identifies polyadenylated and non‐polyadenylated flower lncRNAs in chickpea

Salinity severely affects the yield of chickpea. Understanding the role of lncRNAs can shed light on chickpea salt tolerance mechanisms. However, because lncRNAs are encoded by multiple sites within the genome, their classification to reveal functional versatility at the transcriptional and the post...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaashyap, Mayank, Kaur, Sukhjiwan, Ford, Rebecca, Edwards, David, Siddique, Kadambot H.M., Varshney, Rajeev K., Mantri, Nitin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9241372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35395125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13822
_version_ 1784737791731564544
author Kaashyap, Mayank
Kaur, Sukhjiwan
Ford, Rebecca
Edwards, David
Siddique, Kadambot H.M.
Varshney, Rajeev K.
Mantri, Nitin
author_facet Kaashyap, Mayank
Kaur, Sukhjiwan
Ford, Rebecca
Edwards, David
Siddique, Kadambot H.M.
Varshney, Rajeev K.
Mantri, Nitin
author_sort Kaashyap, Mayank
collection PubMed
description Salinity severely affects the yield of chickpea. Understanding the role of lncRNAs can shed light on chickpea salt tolerance mechanisms. However, because lncRNAs are encoded by multiple sites within the genome, their classification to reveal functional versatility at the transcriptional and the post‐transcriptional levels is challenging. To address this, we deep sequenced 24 salt‐challenged flower transcriptomes from two parental genotypes of a RIL population that significantly differ in salt tolerance ability. The transcriptomes for the first time included 12 polyadenylated and 12 non‐polyadenylated RNA libraries to a sequencing depth of ~50 million reads. The ab initio transcriptome assembly comprised ~34 082 transcripts from three biological replicates of salt‐tolerant (JG11) and salt‐sensitive (ICCV2) flowers. A total of 9419 lncRNAs responding to salt stress were identified, 2345 of which were novel lncRNAs specific to chickpea. The expression of poly(A+) lncRNAs and naturally antisense transcribed RNAs suggest their role in post‐transcriptional modification and gene silencing. Notably, 178 differentially expressed lncRNAs were induced in the tolerant genotype but repressed in the sensitive genotype. Co‐expression network analysis revealed that the induced lncRNAs interacted with the FLOWERING LOCUS (FLC), chromatin remodelling and DNA methylation genes, thus inducing flowering during salt stress. Furthermore, 26 lncRNAs showed homology with reported lncRNAs such as COOLAIR, IPS1 and AT4, thus confirming the role of chickpea lncRNAs in controlling flowering time as a crucial salt tolerance mechanism in tolerant chickpea genotype. These robust set of differentially expressed lncRNAs provide a deeper insight into the regulatory mechanisms controlled by lncRNAs under salt stress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9241372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92413722022-07-01 Comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of two RIL parents with contrasting salt responsiveness identifies polyadenylated and non‐polyadenylated flower lncRNAs in chickpea Kaashyap, Mayank Kaur, Sukhjiwan Ford, Rebecca Edwards, David Siddique, Kadambot H.M. Varshney, Rajeev K. Mantri, Nitin Plant Biotechnol J Research Articles Salinity severely affects the yield of chickpea. Understanding the role of lncRNAs can shed light on chickpea salt tolerance mechanisms. However, because lncRNAs are encoded by multiple sites within the genome, their classification to reveal functional versatility at the transcriptional and the post‐transcriptional levels is challenging. To address this, we deep sequenced 24 salt‐challenged flower transcriptomes from two parental genotypes of a RIL population that significantly differ in salt tolerance ability. The transcriptomes for the first time included 12 polyadenylated and 12 non‐polyadenylated RNA libraries to a sequencing depth of ~50 million reads. The ab initio transcriptome assembly comprised ~34 082 transcripts from three biological replicates of salt‐tolerant (JG11) and salt‐sensitive (ICCV2) flowers. A total of 9419 lncRNAs responding to salt stress were identified, 2345 of which were novel lncRNAs specific to chickpea. The expression of poly(A+) lncRNAs and naturally antisense transcribed RNAs suggest their role in post‐transcriptional modification and gene silencing. Notably, 178 differentially expressed lncRNAs were induced in the tolerant genotype but repressed in the sensitive genotype. Co‐expression network analysis revealed that the induced lncRNAs interacted with the FLOWERING LOCUS (FLC), chromatin remodelling and DNA methylation genes, thus inducing flowering during salt stress. Furthermore, 26 lncRNAs showed homology with reported lncRNAs such as COOLAIR, IPS1 and AT4, thus confirming the role of chickpea lncRNAs in controlling flowering time as a crucial salt tolerance mechanism in tolerant chickpea genotype. These robust set of differentially expressed lncRNAs provide a deeper insight into the regulatory mechanisms controlled by lncRNAs under salt stress. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-13 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9241372/ /pubmed/35395125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13822 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Plant Biotechnology Journal published by Society for Experimental Biology and The Association of Applied Biologists and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Kaashyap, Mayank
Kaur, Sukhjiwan
Ford, Rebecca
Edwards, David
Siddique, Kadambot H.M.
Varshney, Rajeev K.
Mantri, Nitin
Comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of two RIL parents with contrasting salt responsiveness identifies polyadenylated and non‐polyadenylated flower lncRNAs in chickpea
title Comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of two RIL parents with contrasting salt responsiveness identifies polyadenylated and non‐polyadenylated flower lncRNAs in chickpea
title_full Comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of two RIL parents with contrasting salt responsiveness identifies polyadenylated and non‐polyadenylated flower lncRNAs in chickpea
title_fullStr Comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of two RIL parents with contrasting salt responsiveness identifies polyadenylated and non‐polyadenylated flower lncRNAs in chickpea
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of two RIL parents with contrasting salt responsiveness identifies polyadenylated and non‐polyadenylated flower lncRNAs in chickpea
title_short Comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of two RIL parents with contrasting salt responsiveness identifies polyadenylated and non‐polyadenylated flower lncRNAs in chickpea
title_sort comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of two ril parents with contrasting salt responsiveness identifies polyadenylated and non‐polyadenylated flower lncrnas in chickpea
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9241372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35395125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13822
work_keys_str_mv AT kaashyapmayank comprehensivetranscriptomicanalysisoftworilparentswithcontrastingsaltresponsivenessidentifiespolyadenylatedandnonpolyadenylatedflowerlncrnasinchickpea
AT kaursukhjiwan comprehensivetranscriptomicanalysisoftworilparentswithcontrastingsaltresponsivenessidentifiespolyadenylatedandnonpolyadenylatedflowerlncrnasinchickpea
AT fordrebecca comprehensivetranscriptomicanalysisoftworilparentswithcontrastingsaltresponsivenessidentifiespolyadenylatedandnonpolyadenylatedflowerlncrnasinchickpea
AT edwardsdavid comprehensivetranscriptomicanalysisoftworilparentswithcontrastingsaltresponsivenessidentifiespolyadenylatedandnonpolyadenylatedflowerlncrnasinchickpea
AT siddiquekadambothm comprehensivetranscriptomicanalysisoftworilparentswithcontrastingsaltresponsivenessidentifiespolyadenylatedandnonpolyadenylatedflowerlncrnasinchickpea
AT varshneyrajeevk comprehensivetranscriptomicanalysisoftworilparentswithcontrastingsaltresponsivenessidentifiespolyadenylatedandnonpolyadenylatedflowerlncrnasinchickpea
AT mantrinitin comprehensivetranscriptomicanalysisoftworilparentswithcontrastingsaltresponsivenessidentifiespolyadenylatedandnonpolyadenylatedflowerlncrnasinchickpea