Cargando…
The plant epitranscriptome: revisiting pseudouridine and 2′‐O‐methyl RNA modifications
There is growing evidence that post‐transcriptional RNA modifications are highly dynamic and can be used to improve crop production. Although more than 172 unique types of RNA modifications have been identified throughout the kingdom of life, we are yet to leverage upon the understanding to optimize...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9241379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35445501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13829 |
_version_ | 1784737793343225856 |
---|---|
author | Ramakrishnan, Muthusamy Rajan, K. Shanmugha Mullasseri, Sileesh Palakkal, Sarin Kalpana, Krishnan Sharma, Anket Zhou, Mingbing Vinod, Kunnummal Kurungara Ramasamy, Subbiah Wei, Qiang |
author_facet | Ramakrishnan, Muthusamy Rajan, K. Shanmugha Mullasseri, Sileesh Palakkal, Sarin Kalpana, Krishnan Sharma, Anket Zhou, Mingbing Vinod, Kunnummal Kurungara Ramasamy, Subbiah Wei, Qiang |
author_sort | Ramakrishnan, Muthusamy |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is growing evidence that post‐transcriptional RNA modifications are highly dynamic and can be used to improve crop production. Although more than 172 unique types of RNA modifications have been identified throughout the kingdom of life, we are yet to leverage upon the understanding to optimize RNA modifications in crops to improve productivity. The contributions of internal mRNA modifications such as N6‐methyladenosine (m(6)A) and 5‐methylcytosine (m(5)C) methylations to embryonic development, root development, leaf morphogenesis, flowering, fruit ripening and stress response are sufficiently known, but the roles of the two most abundant RNA modifications, pseudouridine (Ψ) and 2′‐O‐methylation (Nm), in the cell remain unclear due to insufficient advances in high‐throughput technologies in plant development. Therefore, in this review, we discuss the latest methods and insights gained in mapping internal Ψ and Nm and their unique properties in plants and other organisms. In addition, we discuss the limitations that remain in high‐throughput technologies for qualitative and quantitative mapping of these RNA modifications and highlight future challenges in regulating the plant epitranscriptome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9241379 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92413792022-07-01 The plant epitranscriptome: revisiting pseudouridine and 2′‐O‐methyl RNA modifications Ramakrishnan, Muthusamy Rajan, K. Shanmugha Mullasseri, Sileesh Palakkal, Sarin Kalpana, Krishnan Sharma, Anket Zhou, Mingbing Vinod, Kunnummal Kurungara Ramasamy, Subbiah Wei, Qiang Plant Biotechnol J Review There is growing evidence that post‐transcriptional RNA modifications are highly dynamic and can be used to improve crop production. Although more than 172 unique types of RNA modifications have been identified throughout the kingdom of life, we are yet to leverage upon the understanding to optimize RNA modifications in crops to improve productivity. The contributions of internal mRNA modifications such as N6‐methyladenosine (m(6)A) and 5‐methylcytosine (m(5)C) methylations to embryonic development, root development, leaf morphogenesis, flowering, fruit ripening and stress response are sufficiently known, but the roles of the two most abundant RNA modifications, pseudouridine (Ψ) and 2′‐O‐methylation (Nm), in the cell remain unclear due to insufficient advances in high‐throughput technologies in plant development. Therefore, in this review, we discuss the latest methods and insights gained in mapping internal Ψ and Nm and their unique properties in plants and other organisms. In addition, we discuss the limitations that remain in high‐throughput technologies for qualitative and quantitative mapping of these RNA modifications and highlight future challenges in regulating the plant epitranscriptome. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-11 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9241379/ /pubmed/35445501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13829 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Plant Biotechnology Journal published by Society for Experimental Biology and The Association of Applied Biologists and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Review Ramakrishnan, Muthusamy Rajan, K. Shanmugha Mullasseri, Sileesh Palakkal, Sarin Kalpana, Krishnan Sharma, Anket Zhou, Mingbing Vinod, Kunnummal Kurungara Ramasamy, Subbiah Wei, Qiang The plant epitranscriptome: revisiting pseudouridine and 2′‐O‐methyl RNA modifications |
title | The plant epitranscriptome: revisiting pseudouridine and 2′‐O‐methyl RNA modifications |
title_full | The plant epitranscriptome: revisiting pseudouridine and 2′‐O‐methyl RNA modifications |
title_fullStr | The plant epitranscriptome: revisiting pseudouridine and 2′‐O‐methyl RNA modifications |
title_full_unstemmed | The plant epitranscriptome: revisiting pseudouridine and 2′‐O‐methyl RNA modifications |
title_short | The plant epitranscriptome: revisiting pseudouridine and 2′‐O‐methyl RNA modifications |
title_sort | plant epitranscriptome: revisiting pseudouridine and 2′‐o‐methyl rna modifications |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9241379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35445501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13829 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramakrishnanmuthusamy theplantepitranscriptomerevisitingpseudouridineand2omethylrnamodifications AT rajankshanmugha theplantepitranscriptomerevisitingpseudouridineand2omethylrnamodifications AT mullasserisileesh theplantepitranscriptomerevisitingpseudouridineand2omethylrnamodifications AT palakkalsarin theplantepitranscriptomerevisitingpseudouridineand2omethylrnamodifications AT kalpanakrishnan theplantepitranscriptomerevisitingpseudouridineand2omethylrnamodifications AT sharmaanket theplantepitranscriptomerevisitingpseudouridineand2omethylrnamodifications AT zhoumingbing theplantepitranscriptomerevisitingpseudouridineand2omethylrnamodifications AT vinodkunnummalkurungara theplantepitranscriptomerevisitingpseudouridineand2omethylrnamodifications AT ramasamysubbiah theplantepitranscriptomerevisitingpseudouridineand2omethylrnamodifications AT weiqiang theplantepitranscriptomerevisitingpseudouridineand2omethylrnamodifications AT ramakrishnanmuthusamy plantepitranscriptomerevisitingpseudouridineand2omethylrnamodifications AT rajankshanmugha plantepitranscriptomerevisitingpseudouridineand2omethylrnamodifications AT mullasserisileesh plantepitranscriptomerevisitingpseudouridineand2omethylrnamodifications AT palakkalsarin plantepitranscriptomerevisitingpseudouridineand2omethylrnamodifications AT kalpanakrishnan plantepitranscriptomerevisitingpseudouridineand2omethylrnamodifications AT sharmaanket plantepitranscriptomerevisitingpseudouridineand2omethylrnamodifications AT zhoumingbing plantepitranscriptomerevisitingpseudouridineand2omethylrnamodifications AT vinodkunnummalkurungara plantepitranscriptomerevisitingpseudouridineand2omethylrnamodifications AT ramasamysubbiah plantepitranscriptomerevisitingpseudouridineand2omethylrnamodifications AT weiqiang plantepitranscriptomerevisitingpseudouridineand2omethylrnamodifications |