Cargando…

Autoimmune connective tissue diseases and aortic valve replacement outcomes: a population-based study

AIMS: Patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases (CTDs) have a high burden of valvular heart disease and are often thought of as high surgical risk patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) were identified in the Nationwide Readmissions Database betwe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gad, Mohamed M., Lichtman, Devora, Saad, Anas M., Isogai, Toshiaki, Bansal, Agam, Abdallah, Mouin S., Roselli, Eric, Chatterjee, Soumya, Reed, Grant W., Kapadia, Samir R., Menon, Venu, Wassif, Heba
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9242052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35919348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeac024
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS: Patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases (CTDs) have a high burden of valvular heart disease and are often thought of as high surgical risk patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) were identified in the Nationwide Readmissions Database between January 2012 and December 2018. Patients with a history of systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, mixed C, Sjögren syndrome, polymyositis, and dermatomyositis were included in the CTD cohort. Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting concomitantly with AVR were excluded. A total of 569 600 hospitalizations were included, of which16 531 (2.9%) had CTD. CTD patients were more likely to be females, with higher rates of heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, and more likely to be insured by Medicare. CTD patients had lower mortality than non-CTD patients [odds ratio (OR) 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59–0.74] and stroke [OR 0.87; 95% (CI): 0.79–0.97]. CTD patients undergoing SAVR had lower mortality [OR 0.69; 95% (CI): 0.60–0.80] and stroke [OR 0.86; 95% (CI): 0.75–0.98). CTD patients undergoing TAVR had lower mortality outcomes [OR 0.67; 95% (CI): 0.56–0.80]; however, they had comparable stroke outcomes [OR 0.97; 95% (CI): 0.83–1.13, P = 0.69]. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes for patients with CTD requiring AVR are not inferior to their non-CTD counterparts. A comprehensive heart team selection of patients undergoing AVR approaches should place CTD history under consideration; however, pre-existing CTD should not be prohibitive of AVR interventions.