Cargando…

A Psychological Investigation of Selection Criteria for Learning Agents (Super Users) and Allocation of Responsibilities in the Implementation of Technological Change

PURPOSE: In the introduction of new technologies into organizations, there has been an increasing trend to recruit and make use of the so-called “super users” to help ensure the future use of the technology in question. Little is known about the criteria that should ideally be considered in the sele...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaag, Jonas R., Sætren, Gunhild B., Halvorsen, Thomas H., Sørgård, Stine D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9242093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35783754
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.928217
_version_ 1784737979411988480
author Vaag, Jonas R.
Sætren, Gunhild B.
Halvorsen, Thomas H.
Sørgård, Stine D.
author_facet Vaag, Jonas R.
Sætren, Gunhild B.
Halvorsen, Thomas H.
Sørgård, Stine D.
author_sort Vaag, Jonas R.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In the introduction of new technologies into organizations, there has been an increasing trend to recruit and make use of the so-called “super users” to help ensure the future use of the technology in question. Little is known about the criteria that should ideally be considered in the selection of these super users, or about the best way to carve up the roles and responsibilities in this process between super users and middle management. In this study, we investigated (1) which criteria should be emphasized in the selection of super users, and (2) how middle management and super users understand and negotiate the responsibilities of their respective roles during implementation of technological change. METHODS: We conducted 10 individual semi-structured interviews and used thematic analysis of this data set to identify selection criteria, roles, and responsibilities. RESULTS: We found that the main selection criteria for super users should be: (1) availability and local knowledge, (2) technological skills, (3) pedagogical skills, and (4) proactiveness. The main roles and responsibilities that should be carved up between management and super users can be grouped into two overarching categories, each with several subcategories. Within the Learning culture category, the responsibilities are to (1) facilitate collective learning, (2) engage with criticism, and (3) promote collective sharing; and within the Individual learning category, to (4) facilitate individual learning, (5) provide instrumental support, and (6) provide emotional support. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Based on the findings, we propose a conceptual model of technological implementation and the construction of a culture of organizational learning, entitled ECo-System Of Learning in Organizations (ECSO-Learn); we additionally show how a learning agent (previously known as a super user) can be recruited to best fit into this model of long-term organizational learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9242093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92420932022-06-30 A Psychological Investigation of Selection Criteria for Learning Agents (Super Users) and Allocation of Responsibilities in the Implementation of Technological Change Vaag, Jonas R. Sætren, Gunhild B. Halvorsen, Thomas H. Sørgård, Stine D. Front Psychol Psychology PURPOSE: In the introduction of new technologies into organizations, there has been an increasing trend to recruit and make use of the so-called “super users” to help ensure the future use of the technology in question. Little is known about the criteria that should ideally be considered in the selection of these super users, or about the best way to carve up the roles and responsibilities in this process between super users and middle management. In this study, we investigated (1) which criteria should be emphasized in the selection of super users, and (2) how middle management and super users understand and negotiate the responsibilities of their respective roles during implementation of technological change. METHODS: We conducted 10 individual semi-structured interviews and used thematic analysis of this data set to identify selection criteria, roles, and responsibilities. RESULTS: We found that the main selection criteria for super users should be: (1) availability and local knowledge, (2) technological skills, (3) pedagogical skills, and (4) proactiveness. The main roles and responsibilities that should be carved up between management and super users can be grouped into two overarching categories, each with several subcategories. Within the Learning culture category, the responsibilities are to (1) facilitate collective learning, (2) engage with criticism, and (3) promote collective sharing; and within the Individual learning category, to (4) facilitate individual learning, (5) provide instrumental support, and (6) provide emotional support. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Based on the findings, we propose a conceptual model of technological implementation and the construction of a culture of organizational learning, entitled ECo-System Of Learning in Organizations (ECSO-Learn); we additionally show how a learning agent (previously known as a super user) can be recruited to best fit into this model of long-term organizational learning. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9242093/ /pubmed/35783754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.928217 Text en Copyright © 2022 Vaag, Sætren, Halvorsen and Sørgård. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Vaag, Jonas R.
Sætren, Gunhild B.
Halvorsen, Thomas H.
Sørgård, Stine D.
A Psychological Investigation of Selection Criteria for Learning Agents (Super Users) and Allocation of Responsibilities in the Implementation of Technological Change
title A Psychological Investigation of Selection Criteria for Learning Agents (Super Users) and Allocation of Responsibilities in the Implementation of Technological Change
title_full A Psychological Investigation of Selection Criteria for Learning Agents (Super Users) and Allocation of Responsibilities in the Implementation of Technological Change
title_fullStr A Psychological Investigation of Selection Criteria for Learning Agents (Super Users) and Allocation of Responsibilities in the Implementation of Technological Change
title_full_unstemmed A Psychological Investigation of Selection Criteria for Learning Agents (Super Users) and Allocation of Responsibilities in the Implementation of Technological Change
title_short A Psychological Investigation of Selection Criteria for Learning Agents (Super Users) and Allocation of Responsibilities in the Implementation of Technological Change
title_sort psychological investigation of selection criteria for learning agents (super users) and allocation of responsibilities in the implementation of technological change
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9242093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35783754
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.928217
work_keys_str_mv AT vaagjonasr apsychologicalinvestigationofselectioncriteriaforlearningagentssuperusersandallocationofresponsibilitiesintheimplementationoftechnologicalchange
AT sætrengunhildb apsychologicalinvestigationofselectioncriteriaforlearningagentssuperusersandallocationofresponsibilitiesintheimplementationoftechnologicalchange
AT halvorsenthomash apsychologicalinvestigationofselectioncriteriaforlearningagentssuperusersandallocationofresponsibilitiesintheimplementationoftechnologicalchange
AT sørgardstined apsychologicalinvestigationofselectioncriteriaforlearningagentssuperusersandallocationofresponsibilitiesintheimplementationoftechnologicalchange
AT vaagjonasr psychologicalinvestigationofselectioncriteriaforlearningagentssuperusersandallocationofresponsibilitiesintheimplementationoftechnologicalchange
AT sætrengunhildb psychologicalinvestigationofselectioncriteriaforlearningagentssuperusersandallocationofresponsibilitiesintheimplementationoftechnologicalchange
AT halvorsenthomash psychologicalinvestigationofselectioncriteriaforlearningagentssuperusersandallocationofresponsibilitiesintheimplementationoftechnologicalchange
AT sørgardstined psychologicalinvestigationofselectioncriteriaforlearningagentssuperusersandallocationofresponsibilitiesintheimplementationoftechnologicalchange