Cargando…
Examination of care processes and treatment optimization for head and neck cancer patients in a community setting “hub and hub” model
OBJECTIVE: To examine referral pattern, the timing of diagnostic/staging processes, and treatment initiation for new head and neck cancer patients in a community setting. METHODS: Patients with a newly diagnosed previously untreated diagnosis of head neck cancer managed at Asplundh Cancer Pavilion/A...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9242418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35782402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.14 |
_version_ | 1784738052725276672 |
---|---|
author | Sethi, Harleen K. Walker, Elijah Weinsheim, Travis Brennan, Matthew J. Fundakowski, Christopher E. |
author_facet | Sethi, Harleen K. Walker, Elijah Weinsheim, Travis Brennan, Matthew J. Fundakowski, Christopher E. |
author_sort | Sethi, Harleen K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To examine referral pattern, the timing of diagnostic/staging processes, and treatment initiation for new head and neck cancer patients in a community setting. METHODS: Patients with a newly diagnosed previously untreated diagnosis of head neck cancer managed at Asplundh Cancer Pavilion/Abington Memorial Hospital from October 2018 to March 2020. Source of referral and preceding workup were examined as well as intervals between initial head and neck consult and various timepoints of treatment initiation. RESULTS: One hundred and five patients were included in the study. The primary referral sources were external general otolaryngology (56.3%). Oral surgery and dermatology obtained tissue biopsy approximately 80% of the time before referral. The average time from the ordering of initial staging positron emission tomography/computed tomography to finalized results was 14 days (range: 10–25 days). Patients referred from dermatology and oral surgery were more likely to require single modality care, namely definitive surgical management. Time to treatment initiation average was 37 days (range: 29–41 days). Patients with longer treatment times noted significantly higher times to both radiation and medical oncology consults (48.42 vs. 18.13 days; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: No notable differences in treatment initiation times were identified based on referral source or extent of workup performed before head/neck surgery consult. It appears the largest opportunities for improvement in terms of reducing overall treatment length exist in the optimization of radiation initiation time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9242418 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92424182022-07-01 Examination of care processes and treatment optimization for head and neck cancer patients in a community setting “hub and hub” model Sethi, Harleen K. Walker, Elijah Weinsheim, Travis Brennan, Matthew J. Fundakowski, Christopher E. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg Research Papers OBJECTIVE: To examine referral pattern, the timing of diagnostic/staging processes, and treatment initiation for new head and neck cancer patients in a community setting. METHODS: Patients with a newly diagnosed previously untreated diagnosis of head neck cancer managed at Asplundh Cancer Pavilion/Abington Memorial Hospital from October 2018 to March 2020. Source of referral and preceding workup were examined as well as intervals between initial head and neck consult and various timepoints of treatment initiation. RESULTS: One hundred and five patients were included in the study. The primary referral sources were external general otolaryngology (56.3%). Oral surgery and dermatology obtained tissue biopsy approximately 80% of the time before referral. The average time from the ordering of initial staging positron emission tomography/computed tomography to finalized results was 14 days (range: 10–25 days). Patients referred from dermatology and oral surgery were more likely to require single modality care, namely definitive surgical management. Time to treatment initiation average was 37 days (range: 29–41 days). Patients with longer treatment times noted significantly higher times to both radiation and medical oncology consults (48.42 vs. 18.13 days; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: No notable differences in treatment initiation times were identified based on referral source or extent of workup performed before head/neck surgery consult. It appears the largest opportunities for improvement in terms of reducing overall treatment length exist in the optimization of radiation initiation time. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9242418/ /pubmed/35782402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.14 Text en © 2022 The Authors. World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd on behalf of Chinese Medical Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Papers Sethi, Harleen K. Walker, Elijah Weinsheim, Travis Brennan, Matthew J. Fundakowski, Christopher E. Examination of care processes and treatment optimization for head and neck cancer patients in a community setting “hub and hub” model |
title | Examination of care processes and treatment optimization for head and neck cancer patients in a community setting “hub and hub” model |
title_full | Examination of care processes and treatment optimization for head and neck cancer patients in a community setting “hub and hub” model |
title_fullStr | Examination of care processes and treatment optimization for head and neck cancer patients in a community setting “hub and hub” model |
title_full_unstemmed | Examination of care processes and treatment optimization for head and neck cancer patients in a community setting “hub and hub” model |
title_short | Examination of care processes and treatment optimization for head and neck cancer patients in a community setting “hub and hub” model |
title_sort | examination of care processes and treatment optimization for head and neck cancer patients in a community setting “hub and hub” model |
topic | Research Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9242418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35782402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.14 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sethiharleenk examinationofcareprocessesandtreatmentoptimizationforheadandneckcancerpatientsinacommunitysettinghubandhubmodel AT walkerelijah examinationofcareprocessesandtreatmentoptimizationforheadandneckcancerpatientsinacommunitysettinghubandhubmodel AT weinsheimtravis examinationofcareprocessesandtreatmentoptimizationforheadandneckcancerpatientsinacommunitysettinghubandhubmodel AT brennanmatthewj examinationofcareprocessesandtreatmentoptimizationforheadandneckcancerpatientsinacommunitysettinghubandhubmodel AT fundakowskichristophere examinationofcareprocessesandtreatmentoptimizationforheadandneckcancerpatientsinacommunitysettinghubandhubmodel |