Cargando…

Molecular stiffness cues of an interpenetrating network hydrogel for cell adhesion

Understanding cells' response to the macroscopic and nanoscale properties of biomaterials requires studies in model systems with the possibility to tailor their mechanical properties and different length scales. Here, we describe an interpenetrating network (IPN) design based on a stiff PEGDA h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Bin, Çolak, Arzu, Blass, Johanna, Han, Mitchell, Zhang, Jingnan, Zheng, Yijun, Jiang, Qiyang, Bennewitz, Roland, Campo, Aránzazu del
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9243155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35782598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100323
_version_ 1784738245118001152
author Li, Bin
Çolak, Arzu
Blass, Johanna
Han, Mitchell
Zhang, Jingnan
Zheng, Yijun
Jiang, Qiyang
Bennewitz, Roland
Campo, Aránzazu del
author_facet Li, Bin
Çolak, Arzu
Blass, Johanna
Han, Mitchell
Zhang, Jingnan
Zheng, Yijun
Jiang, Qiyang
Bennewitz, Roland
Campo, Aránzazu del
author_sort Li, Bin
collection PubMed
description Understanding cells' response to the macroscopic and nanoscale properties of biomaterials requires studies in model systems with the possibility to tailor their mechanical properties and different length scales. Here, we describe an interpenetrating network (IPN) design based on a stiff PEGDA host network interlaced within a soft 4-arm PEG-Maleimide/thiol (guest) network. We quantify the nano- and bulk mechanical behavior of the IPN and the single network hydrogels by single-molecule force spectroscopy and rheological measurements. The IPN presents different mechanical cues at the molecular scale, depending on which network is linked to the probe, but the same mechanical properties at the macroscopic length scale as the individual host network. Cells attached to the interpenetrating (guest) network of the IPN or to the single network (SN) PEGDA hydrogel modified with RGD adhesive ligands showed comparable attachment and spreading areas, but cells attached to the guest network of the IPN, with lower molecular stiffness, showed a larger number and size of focal adhesion complexes and a higher concentration of the Hippo pathway effector Yes-associated protein (YAP) than cells linked to the PEGDA single network. The observations indicate that cell adhesion to the IPN hydrogel through the network with lower molecular stiffness proceeds effectively as if a higher ligand density is offered. We claim that IPNs can be used to decipher how changes in ECM design and connectivity at the local scale affect the fate of cells cultured on biomaterials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9243155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92431552022-07-01 Molecular stiffness cues of an interpenetrating network hydrogel for cell adhesion Li, Bin Çolak, Arzu Blass, Johanna Han, Mitchell Zhang, Jingnan Zheng, Yijun Jiang, Qiyang Bennewitz, Roland Campo, Aránzazu del Mater Today Bio Short Communication Understanding cells' response to the macroscopic and nanoscale properties of biomaterials requires studies in model systems with the possibility to tailor their mechanical properties and different length scales. Here, we describe an interpenetrating network (IPN) design based on a stiff PEGDA host network interlaced within a soft 4-arm PEG-Maleimide/thiol (guest) network. We quantify the nano- and bulk mechanical behavior of the IPN and the single network hydrogels by single-molecule force spectroscopy and rheological measurements. The IPN presents different mechanical cues at the molecular scale, depending on which network is linked to the probe, but the same mechanical properties at the macroscopic length scale as the individual host network. Cells attached to the interpenetrating (guest) network of the IPN or to the single network (SN) PEGDA hydrogel modified with RGD adhesive ligands showed comparable attachment and spreading areas, but cells attached to the guest network of the IPN, with lower molecular stiffness, showed a larger number and size of focal adhesion complexes and a higher concentration of the Hippo pathway effector Yes-associated protein (YAP) than cells linked to the PEGDA single network. The observations indicate that cell adhesion to the IPN hydrogel through the network with lower molecular stiffness proceeds effectively as if a higher ligand density is offered. We claim that IPNs can be used to decipher how changes in ECM design and connectivity at the local scale affect the fate of cells cultured on biomaterials. Elsevier 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9243155/ /pubmed/35782598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100323 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Short Communication
Li, Bin
Çolak, Arzu
Blass, Johanna
Han, Mitchell
Zhang, Jingnan
Zheng, Yijun
Jiang, Qiyang
Bennewitz, Roland
Campo, Aránzazu del
Molecular stiffness cues of an interpenetrating network hydrogel for cell adhesion
title Molecular stiffness cues of an interpenetrating network hydrogel for cell adhesion
title_full Molecular stiffness cues of an interpenetrating network hydrogel for cell adhesion
title_fullStr Molecular stiffness cues of an interpenetrating network hydrogel for cell adhesion
title_full_unstemmed Molecular stiffness cues of an interpenetrating network hydrogel for cell adhesion
title_short Molecular stiffness cues of an interpenetrating network hydrogel for cell adhesion
title_sort molecular stiffness cues of an interpenetrating network hydrogel for cell adhesion
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9243155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35782598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100323
work_keys_str_mv AT libin molecularstiffnesscuesofaninterpenetratingnetworkhydrogelforcelladhesion
AT colakarzu molecularstiffnesscuesofaninterpenetratingnetworkhydrogelforcelladhesion
AT blassjohanna molecularstiffnesscuesofaninterpenetratingnetworkhydrogelforcelladhesion
AT hanmitchell molecularstiffnesscuesofaninterpenetratingnetworkhydrogelforcelladhesion
AT zhangjingnan molecularstiffnesscuesofaninterpenetratingnetworkhydrogelforcelladhesion
AT zhengyijun molecularstiffnesscuesofaninterpenetratingnetworkhydrogelforcelladhesion
AT jiangqiyang molecularstiffnesscuesofaninterpenetratingnetworkhydrogelforcelladhesion
AT bennewitzroland molecularstiffnesscuesofaninterpenetratingnetworkhydrogelforcelladhesion
AT campoaranzazudel molecularstiffnesscuesofaninterpenetratingnetworkhydrogelforcelladhesion