Cargando…

Optimal Indicator of Death for Using Real-World Cancer Patients' Data From the Healthcare System

Background: Information on patient’s death is a major outcome of health-related research, but it is not always available in claim-based databases. Herein, we suggested the operational definition of death as an optimal indicator of real death and aim to examine its validity and application in patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jang, Suk-Chan, Kwon, Sun-Hong, Min, Serim, Jo, Ae-Ryeo, Lee, Eui-Kyung, Nam, Jin Hyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9243505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35784684
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.906211
_version_ 1784738328988352512
author Jang, Suk-Chan
Kwon, Sun-Hong
Min, Serim
Jo, Ae-Ryeo
Lee, Eui-Kyung
Nam, Jin Hyun
author_facet Jang, Suk-Chan
Kwon, Sun-Hong
Min, Serim
Jo, Ae-Ryeo
Lee, Eui-Kyung
Nam, Jin Hyun
author_sort Jang, Suk-Chan
collection PubMed
description Background: Information on patient’s death is a major outcome of health-related research, but it is not always available in claim-based databases. Herein, we suggested the operational definition of death as an optimal indicator of real death and aim to examine its validity and application in patients with cancer. Materials and methods: Data of newly diagnosed patients with cancer between 2006 and 2015 from the Korean National Health Insurance Service—National Sample Cohort data were used. Death indicators were operationally defined as follows: 1) in-hospital death (the result of treatment or disease diagnosis code from claims data), or 2) case wherein there are no claims within 365 days of the last claim. We estimated true-positive rates (TPR) and false-positive rates (FPR) for real death and operational definition of death in patients with high-, middle-, and low-mortality cancers. Kaplan−Meier survival curves and log-rank tests were conducted to determine whether real death and operational definition of death rates were consistent. Results: A total of 40,970 patients with cancer were recruited for this study. Among them, 12,604 patients were officially reported as dead. These patients were stratified into high- (lung, liver, and pancreatic), middle- (stomach, skin, and kidney), and low- (thyroid) mortality groups consisting of 6,626 (death: 4,287), 7,282 (1,858), and 6,316 (93) patients, respectively. The TPR was 97.08% and the FPR was 0.98% in the high mortality group. In the case of the middle and low mortality groups, the TPR (FPR) was 95.86% (1.77%) and 97.85% (0.58%), respectively. The overall TPR and FPR were 96.68 and 1.27%. There was no significant difference between the real and operational definition of death in the log-rank test for all types of cancers except for thyroid cancer. Conclusion: Defining deaths operationally using in-hospital death data and periods after the last claim is a robust alternative to identifying mortality in patients with cancer. This optimal indicator of death will promote research using claim-based data lacking death information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9243505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92435052022-07-01 Optimal Indicator of Death for Using Real-World Cancer Patients' Data From the Healthcare System Jang, Suk-Chan Kwon, Sun-Hong Min, Serim Jo, Ae-Ryeo Lee, Eui-Kyung Nam, Jin Hyun Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Information on patient’s death is a major outcome of health-related research, but it is not always available in claim-based databases. Herein, we suggested the operational definition of death as an optimal indicator of real death and aim to examine its validity and application in patients with cancer. Materials and methods: Data of newly diagnosed patients with cancer between 2006 and 2015 from the Korean National Health Insurance Service—National Sample Cohort data were used. Death indicators were operationally defined as follows: 1) in-hospital death (the result of treatment or disease diagnosis code from claims data), or 2) case wherein there are no claims within 365 days of the last claim. We estimated true-positive rates (TPR) and false-positive rates (FPR) for real death and operational definition of death in patients with high-, middle-, and low-mortality cancers. Kaplan−Meier survival curves and log-rank tests were conducted to determine whether real death and operational definition of death rates were consistent. Results: A total of 40,970 patients with cancer were recruited for this study. Among them, 12,604 patients were officially reported as dead. These patients were stratified into high- (lung, liver, and pancreatic), middle- (stomach, skin, and kidney), and low- (thyroid) mortality groups consisting of 6,626 (death: 4,287), 7,282 (1,858), and 6,316 (93) patients, respectively. The TPR was 97.08% and the FPR was 0.98% in the high mortality group. In the case of the middle and low mortality groups, the TPR (FPR) was 95.86% (1.77%) and 97.85% (0.58%), respectively. The overall TPR and FPR were 96.68 and 1.27%. There was no significant difference between the real and operational definition of death in the log-rank test for all types of cancers except for thyroid cancer. Conclusion: Defining deaths operationally using in-hospital death data and periods after the last claim is a robust alternative to identifying mortality in patients with cancer. This optimal indicator of death will promote research using claim-based data lacking death information. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9243505/ /pubmed/35784684 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.906211 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jang, Kwon, Min, Jo, Lee and Nam. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Jang, Suk-Chan
Kwon, Sun-Hong
Min, Serim
Jo, Ae-Ryeo
Lee, Eui-Kyung
Nam, Jin Hyun
Optimal Indicator of Death for Using Real-World Cancer Patients' Data From the Healthcare System
title Optimal Indicator of Death for Using Real-World Cancer Patients' Data From the Healthcare System
title_full Optimal Indicator of Death for Using Real-World Cancer Patients' Data From the Healthcare System
title_fullStr Optimal Indicator of Death for Using Real-World Cancer Patients' Data From the Healthcare System
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Indicator of Death for Using Real-World Cancer Patients' Data From the Healthcare System
title_short Optimal Indicator of Death for Using Real-World Cancer Patients' Data From the Healthcare System
title_sort optimal indicator of death for using real-world cancer patients' data from the healthcare system
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9243505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35784684
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.906211
work_keys_str_mv AT jangsukchan optimalindicatorofdeathforusingrealworldcancerpatientsdatafromthehealthcaresystem
AT kwonsunhong optimalindicatorofdeathforusingrealworldcancerpatientsdatafromthehealthcaresystem
AT minserim optimalindicatorofdeathforusingrealworldcancerpatientsdatafromthehealthcaresystem
AT joaeryeo optimalindicatorofdeathforusingrealworldcancerpatientsdatafromthehealthcaresystem
AT leeeuikyung optimalindicatorofdeathforusingrealworldcancerpatientsdatafromthehealthcaresystem
AT namjinhyun optimalindicatorofdeathforusingrealworldcancerpatientsdatafromthehealthcaresystem