Cargando…

Evolution and Evaluation of a Structured Applied Physics Course for Radiation Oncology and Radiation Physics Trainees

We sought to supplement medical physics textbook knowledge and clinical learning with case-based discussions. To our knowledge, this is the first report on a structured combined applied physics curriculum for radiation oncology (RO) and medical physics (MP) trainees. We reviewed our yearly applied p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Babic, S., McNiven, A. L., Bezjak, A., Balogh, J. M., Mah, K., Tsao, M. N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9243863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35761143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-022-02190-8
_version_ 1784738404980752384
author Babic, S.
McNiven, A. L.
Bezjak, A.
Balogh, J. M.
Mah, K.
Tsao, M. N.
author_facet Babic, S.
McNiven, A. L.
Bezjak, A.
Balogh, J. M.
Mah, K.
Tsao, M. N.
author_sort Babic, S.
collection PubMed
description We sought to supplement medical physics textbook knowledge and clinical learning with case-based discussions. To our knowledge, this is the first report on a structured combined applied physics curriculum for radiation oncology (RO) and medical physics (MP) trainees. We reviewed our yearly applied physics course given from the years 2016–2021 inclusive. The number of applied physics trainees ranged from 7 to 14 per year (2–9 RO and 3–6 MP residents per year). Each session was taught by a pair of (RO and MP) faculty members. Twenty-nine case-based sessions were given yearly (2016 to 2019). Because of the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, the course was shortened to 8 case-based sessions in 2020 and 2021. For the years 2016–2021, the mean and median teaching evaluation scores were 4.65 and 5, respectively (range 2–5), where 1 represents worse teaching quality and 5, the best teaching quality. For the year 2021, 2 questions relating to the video virtual format (implemented due to the covid-19 pandemic), revealed consistent high scores with the mean and median responses of 4.14 and 5, respectively (range 1–5). The results from the teaching evaluation scores indicate that the trainees highly valued the teaching sessions and teachers. Our experience indicates that a case-based applied physics course was delivered successfully with continued high teaching evaluation scores. A video virtual platform for an applied physics course could be useful, especially for small programs without a structured applied physics curriculum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9243863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92438632022-06-30 Evolution and Evaluation of a Structured Applied Physics Course for Radiation Oncology and Radiation Physics Trainees Babic, S. McNiven, A. L. Bezjak, A. Balogh, J. M. Mah, K. Tsao, M. N. J Cancer Educ Article We sought to supplement medical physics textbook knowledge and clinical learning with case-based discussions. To our knowledge, this is the first report on a structured combined applied physics curriculum for radiation oncology (RO) and medical physics (MP) trainees. We reviewed our yearly applied physics course given from the years 2016–2021 inclusive. The number of applied physics trainees ranged from 7 to 14 per year (2–9 RO and 3–6 MP residents per year). Each session was taught by a pair of (RO and MP) faculty members. Twenty-nine case-based sessions were given yearly (2016 to 2019). Because of the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, the course was shortened to 8 case-based sessions in 2020 and 2021. For the years 2016–2021, the mean and median teaching evaluation scores were 4.65 and 5, respectively (range 2–5), where 1 represents worse teaching quality and 5, the best teaching quality. For the year 2021, 2 questions relating to the video virtual format (implemented due to the covid-19 pandemic), revealed consistent high scores with the mean and median responses of 4.14 and 5, respectively (range 1–5). The results from the teaching evaluation scores indicate that the trainees highly valued the teaching sessions and teachers. Our experience indicates that a case-based applied physics course was delivered successfully with continued high teaching evaluation scores. A video virtual platform for an applied physics course could be useful, especially for small programs without a structured applied physics curriculum. Springer US 2022-06-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9243863/ /pubmed/35761143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-022-02190-8 Text en © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Association for Cancer Education 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Babic, S.
McNiven, A. L.
Bezjak, A.
Balogh, J. M.
Mah, K.
Tsao, M. N.
Evolution and Evaluation of a Structured Applied Physics Course for Radiation Oncology and Radiation Physics Trainees
title Evolution and Evaluation of a Structured Applied Physics Course for Radiation Oncology and Radiation Physics Trainees
title_full Evolution and Evaluation of a Structured Applied Physics Course for Radiation Oncology and Radiation Physics Trainees
title_fullStr Evolution and Evaluation of a Structured Applied Physics Course for Radiation Oncology and Radiation Physics Trainees
title_full_unstemmed Evolution and Evaluation of a Structured Applied Physics Course for Radiation Oncology and Radiation Physics Trainees
title_short Evolution and Evaluation of a Structured Applied Physics Course for Radiation Oncology and Radiation Physics Trainees
title_sort evolution and evaluation of a structured applied physics course for radiation oncology and radiation physics trainees
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9243863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35761143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-022-02190-8
work_keys_str_mv AT babics evolutionandevaluationofastructuredappliedphysicscourseforradiationoncologyandradiationphysicstrainees
AT mcnivenal evolutionandevaluationofastructuredappliedphysicscourseforradiationoncologyandradiationphysicstrainees
AT bezjaka evolutionandevaluationofastructuredappliedphysicscourseforradiationoncologyandradiationphysicstrainees
AT baloghjm evolutionandevaluationofastructuredappliedphysicscourseforradiationoncologyandradiationphysicstrainees
AT mahk evolutionandevaluationofastructuredappliedphysicscourseforradiationoncologyandradiationphysicstrainees
AT tsaomn evolutionandevaluationofastructuredappliedphysicscourseforradiationoncologyandradiationphysicstrainees