Cargando…
Shrinking Urban System of the Largest Country: Research Progress and Unsolved Issues
The article is a review of trends of the last decade in the development and study of the urban system of Russia and its largest agglomerations, Moscow, in particular. The features of Russia’s urban network are noted against the global background and key features, shifts in the urban network, includi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pleiades Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9244206/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S2079970522020010 |
_version_ | 1784738475870781440 |
---|---|
author | Antonov, E. V. Kurichev, N. K. Treivish, A. I. |
author_facet | Antonov, E. V. Kurichev, N. K. Treivish, A. I. |
author_sort | Antonov, E. V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The article is a review of trends of the last decade in the development and study of the urban system of Russia and its largest agglomerations, Moscow, in particular. The features of Russia’s urban network are noted against the global background and key features, shifts in the urban network, including the ongoing concentration of people in major cities and urban agglomerations with the degradation of lower levels of the urban system—small towns and urban-type settlements. The reasons for these processes are associated both with the natural increase/decrease and, in particular, migrations of the population and administrative decisions: the expansion of large cities, elimination of urban-type settlements, etc. The differences between the Russian regions in the number and size of urban settlements are shown, as well as the direction of the drift of demographic centers. A review of studies on urban agglomerations revealed their continuity with Soviet ones. The main conclusions on the dynamics of the development of urban agglomerations correspond to those obtained earlier: the growth of the largest urban agglomerations, primarily, the Moscow and St. Petersburg ones, continues, while the demographic resource for feeding smaller agglomerations is gradually decreasing: they grow more slowly or even decrease in size. Migration remains the key transformation mechanism, largely due to the strongest polarization of the state of the labor market between the centers of urban agglomerations, their belts, and the periphery outside the agglomeration, which initiates large-scale temporary labor and resettlement migrations. Against this background, the Moscow agglomeration stands out ever more significantly, growing into the core of the emerging Central Russian megalopolis. The direct impact of the capital’s labor and housing markets and associated migration spans Central and Southern Russia, while the indirect impact is felt throughout the country. The growth of the share and role of the Moscow agglomeration in the settlement system is determined by a set of factors that have consolidated its image as a “land of opportunity”: capital rent, centralization of economic and political decisions, agglomeration effect, concentration of the best human capital, and polarization of the labor market and career opportunities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9244206 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Pleiades Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92442062022-06-30 Shrinking Urban System of the Largest Country: Research Progress and Unsolved Issues Antonov, E. V. Kurichev, N. K. Treivish, A. I. Reg. Res. Russ. RUSSIAN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY OF THE EARLY 21st CENTURY: STUDYING NEW PROCESSES AND USING NEW OPPORTUNITIES The article is a review of trends of the last decade in the development and study of the urban system of Russia and its largest agglomerations, Moscow, in particular. The features of Russia’s urban network are noted against the global background and key features, shifts in the urban network, including the ongoing concentration of people in major cities and urban agglomerations with the degradation of lower levels of the urban system—small towns and urban-type settlements. The reasons for these processes are associated both with the natural increase/decrease and, in particular, migrations of the population and administrative decisions: the expansion of large cities, elimination of urban-type settlements, etc. The differences between the Russian regions in the number and size of urban settlements are shown, as well as the direction of the drift of demographic centers. A review of studies on urban agglomerations revealed their continuity with Soviet ones. The main conclusions on the dynamics of the development of urban agglomerations correspond to those obtained earlier: the growth of the largest urban agglomerations, primarily, the Moscow and St. Petersburg ones, continues, while the demographic resource for feeding smaller agglomerations is gradually decreasing: they grow more slowly or even decrease in size. Migration remains the key transformation mechanism, largely due to the strongest polarization of the state of the labor market between the centers of urban agglomerations, their belts, and the periphery outside the agglomeration, which initiates large-scale temporary labor and resettlement migrations. Against this background, the Moscow agglomeration stands out ever more significantly, growing into the core of the emerging Central Russian megalopolis. The direct impact of the capital’s labor and housing markets and associated migration spans Central and Southern Russia, while the indirect impact is felt throughout the country. The growth of the share and role of the Moscow agglomeration in the settlement system is determined by a set of factors that have consolidated its image as a “land of opportunity”: capital rent, centralization of economic and political decisions, agglomeration effect, concentration of the best human capital, and polarization of the labor market and career opportunities. Pleiades Publishing 2022-06-25 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9244206/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S2079970522020010 Text en © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2022, ISSN 2079-9705, Regional Research of Russia, 2022, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 20–35. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2022.Russian Text © The Author(s), 2022, published in Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk, Seriya Geograficheskaya, 2022, No. 3, pp. 310–331. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | RUSSIAN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY OF THE EARLY 21st CENTURY: STUDYING NEW PROCESSES AND USING NEW OPPORTUNITIES Antonov, E. V. Kurichev, N. K. Treivish, A. I. Shrinking Urban System of the Largest Country: Research Progress and Unsolved Issues |
title | Shrinking Urban System of the Largest Country: Research Progress and Unsolved Issues |
title_full | Shrinking Urban System of the Largest Country: Research Progress and Unsolved Issues |
title_fullStr | Shrinking Urban System of the Largest Country: Research Progress and Unsolved Issues |
title_full_unstemmed | Shrinking Urban System of the Largest Country: Research Progress and Unsolved Issues |
title_short | Shrinking Urban System of the Largest Country: Research Progress and Unsolved Issues |
title_sort | shrinking urban system of the largest country: research progress and unsolved issues |
topic | RUSSIAN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY OF THE EARLY 21st CENTURY: STUDYING NEW PROCESSES AND USING NEW OPPORTUNITIES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9244206/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S2079970522020010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT antonovev shrinkingurbansystemofthelargestcountryresearchprogressandunsolvedissues AT kurichevnk shrinkingurbansystemofthelargestcountryresearchprogressandunsolvedissues AT treivishai shrinkingurbansystemofthelargestcountryresearchprogressandunsolvedissues |