Cargando…

How do electronic risk assessment tools affect the communication and understanding of diagnostic uncertainty in the primary care consultation? A systematic review and thematic synthesis

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review and synthesise qualitative research of electronic risk assessment tools (eRATs) in primary care, examining how they affect the communication and understanding of diagnostic risk and uncertainty. eRATs are computer-based algorithms designed to help clinician...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burns, Alex, Donnelly, Brian, Feyi-Waboso, Joshua, Shephard, Elizabeth, Calitri, Raff, Tarrant, Mark, Dean, Sarah Gerard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9244669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35768084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060101
_version_ 1784738578929025024
author Burns, Alex
Donnelly, Brian
Feyi-Waboso, Joshua
Shephard, Elizabeth
Calitri, Raff
Tarrant, Mark
Dean, Sarah Gerard
author_facet Burns, Alex
Donnelly, Brian
Feyi-Waboso, Joshua
Shephard, Elizabeth
Calitri, Raff
Tarrant, Mark
Dean, Sarah Gerard
author_sort Burns, Alex
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review and synthesise qualitative research of electronic risk assessment tools (eRATs) in primary care, examining how they affect the communication and understanding of diagnostic risk and uncertainty. eRATs are computer-based algorithms designed to help clinicians avoid missing important diagnoses, pick up possible symptoms early and facilitate shared decision-making. DESIGN: Systematic search, using predefined criteria of the published literature and synthesis of the qualitative data, using Thematic Synthesis. Database searches on 27 November 2019 were of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science, and a secondary search of the references of included articles. Included studies were those involving electronic risk assessment or decision support, pertaining to diagnosis in primary care, where qualitative data were presented. Non-empirical studies and non-English language studies were excluded. 5971 unique studies were identified of which 441 underwent full-text review. 26 studies were included for data extraction. A further two were found from citation searches. Quality appraisal was via the CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Program) tool. Data extraction was via line by line coding. A thematic synthesis was performed. SETTING: Primary care. RESULTS: eRATs included differential diagnosis suggestion tools, tools which produce a future risk of disease development or recurrence or calculate a risk of current undiagnosed disease. Analytical themes were developed to describe separate aspects of the clinical consultation where risk and uncertainty are both central and altered via the use of an eRAT: ‘Novel risk’, ‘Risk refinement’, ‘Autonomy’, ‘Communication’, ‘Fear’ and ‘Mistrust’. CONCLUSION: eRATs may improve the understanding and communication of risk in the primary care consultation. The themes of ‘Fear’ and ‘Mistrust’ could represent potential challenges with eRATs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD219446.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9244669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92446692022-07-14 How do electronic risk assessment tools affect the communication and understanding of diagnostic uncertainty in the primary care consultation? A systematic review and thematic synthesis Burns, Alex Donnelly, Brian Feyi-Waboso, Joshua Shephard, Elizabeth Calitri, Raff Tarrant, Mark Dean, Sarah Gerard BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review and synthesise qualitative research of electronic risk assessment tools (eRATs) in primary care, examining how they affect the communication and understanding of diagnostic risk and uncertainty. eRATs are computer-based algorithms designed to help clinicians avoid missing important diagnoses, pick up possible symptoms early and facilitate shared decision-making. DESIGN: Systematic search, using predefined criteria of the published literature and synthesis of the qualitative data, using Thematic Synthesis. Database searches on 27 November 2019 were of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science, and a secondary search of the references of included articles. Included studies were those involving electronic risk assessment or decision support, pertaining to diagnosis in primary care, where qualitative data were presented. Non-empirical studies and non-English language studies were excluded. 5971 unique studies were identified of which 441 underwent full-text review. 26 studies were included for data extraction. A further two were found from citation searches. Quality appraisal was via the CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Program) tool. Data extraction was via line by line coding. A thematic synthesis was performed. SETTING: Primary care. RESULTS: eRATs included differential diagnosis suggestion tools, tools which produce a future risk of disease development or recurrence or calculate a risk of current undiagnosed disease. Analytical themes were developed to describe separate aspects of the clinical consultation where risk and uncertainty are both central and altered via the use of an eRAT: ‘Novel risk’, ‘Risk refinement’, ‘Autonomy’, ‘Communication’, ‘Fear’ and ‘Mistrust’. CONCLUSION: eRATs may improve the understanding and communication of risk in the primary care consultation. The themes of ‘Fear’ and ‘Mistrust’ could represent potential challenges with eRATs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD219446. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9244669/ /pubmed/35768084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060101 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Burns, Alex
Donnelly, Brian
Feyi-Waboso, Joshua
Shephard, Elizabeth
Calitri, Raff
Tarrant, Mark
Dean, Sarah Gerard
How do electronic risk assessment tools affect the communication and understanding of diagnostic uncertainty in the primary care consultation? A systematic review and thematic synthesis
title How do electronic risk assessment tools affect the communication and understanding of diagnostic uncertainty in the primary care consultation? A systematic review and thematic synthesis
title_full How do electronic risk assessment tools affect the communication and understanding of diagnostic uncertainty in the primary care consultation? A systematic review and thematic synthesis
title_fullStr How do electronic risk assessment tools affect the communication and understanding of diagnostic uncertainty in the primary care consultation? A systematic review and thematic synthesis
title_full_unstemmed How do electronic risk assessment tools affect the communication and understanding of diagnostic uncertainty in the primary care consultation? A systematic review and thematic synthesis
title_short How do electronic risk assessment tools affect the communication and understanding of diagnostic uncertainty in the primary care consultation? A systematic review and thematic synthesis
title_sort how do electronic risk assessment tools affect the communication and understanding of diagnostic uncertainty in the primary care consultation? a systematic review and thematic synthesis
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9244669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35768084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060101
work_keys_str_mv AT burnsalex howdoelectronicriskassessmenttoolsaffectthecommunicationandunderstandingofdiagnosticuncertaintyintheprimarycareconsultationasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesis
AT donnellybrian howdoelectronicriskassessmenttoolsaffectthecommunicationandunderstandingofdiagnosticuncertaintyintheprimarycareconsultationasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesis
AT feyiwabosojoshua howdoelectronicriskassessmenttoolsaffectthecommunicationandunderstandingofdiagnosticuncertaintyintheprimarycareconsultationasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesis
AT shephardelizabeth howdoelectronicriskassessmenttoolsaffectthecommunicationandunderstandingofdiagnosticuncertaintyintheprimarycareconsultationasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesis
AT calitriraff howdoelectronicriskassessmenttoolsaffectthecommunicationandunderstandingofdiagnosticuncertaintyintheprimarycareconsultationasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesis
AT tarrantmark howdoelectronicriskassessmenttoolsaffectthecommunicationandunderstandingofdiagnosticuncertaintyintheprimarycareconsultationasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesis
AT deansarahgerard howdoelectronicriskassessmenttoolsaffectthecommunicationandunderstandingofdiagnosticuncertaintyintheprimarycareconsultationasystematicreviewandthematicsynthesis