Cargando…

Emergency medicine physician supervision and mortality among patients receiving care from non-physician clinicians in a task-sharing model of emergency care in rural Uganda: a retrospective analysis of a single-centre training programme

OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between emergency medicine physician supervision and 3-day mortality for patients receiving care from non-physician clinicians in a task-sharing model of emergency care in rural Uganda. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis with multivariable logistic regression...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rice, Brian, Pickering, Ashley, Laurence, Colleen, Kizito, Prisca Mary, Leff, Rebecca, Kisingiri, Steven Jonathan, Ndyamwijuka, Charles, Nakato, Serena, Adriko, Lema Felix, Bisanzo, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9244677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35768107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059859
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between emergency medicine physician supervision and 3-day mortality for patients receiving care from non-physician clinicians in a task-sharing model of emergency care in rural Uganda. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis with multivariable logistic regression. SETTING: Single rural Ugandan emergency unit. PARTICIPANTS: All patients presenting for care from 2009 to 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Three cohorts of patients receiving care from non-physician clinicians had three different levels of physician supervision: ‘Direct Supervision’ (2009–2010) emergency medicine physicians directly supervised all care; ‘Indirect Supervision’ (2010–2015) emergency medicine physicians were consulted as needed; ‘Independent Care’ (2015–2019) no emergency medicine physician supervision. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Three-day mortality. RESULTS: 38 033 ED visits met inclusion criteria. Overall mortality decreased significantly across supervision cohorts (‘Direct’ 3.8%, ‘Indirect’ 3.3%, ‘Independent’ 2.6%, p<0.001), but so too did the rates of patients who presented with ≥3 abnormal vitals (‘Direct’ 32%, ‘Indirect’ 19%, ‘Independent’ 13%, p<0.001). After controlling for vital sign abnormalities, ‘Direct’ and ‘Indirect’ supervision were both significantly associated with reduced OR for mortality (‘Direct’: 0.57 (0.37 to 0.90), ‘Indirect’: 0.71 (0.55 to 0.92)) when compared with ‘Independent Care’. Sensitivity analysis showed that this mortality benefit was significant for the minority of patients (17.2%) with ≥3 abnormal vitals (‘Direct’: 0.44 (0.22 to 0.85), ‘Indirect’: 0.60 (0.41 to 0.88)), but not for the majority (82.8%) with two or fewer abnormal vitals (‘Direct’: 0.81 (0.44 to 1.49), ‘Indirect’: 0.82 (0.58 to 1.16)). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency medicine physician supervision of emergency care non-physician clinicians is independently associated with reduced overall mortality. This benefit appears restricted to the highest risk patients based on abnormal vitals. With over 80% of patients having equivalent mortality outcomes with independent non-physician clinician emergency care, a synergistic model providing variable levels of emergency medicine physician supervision or care based on patient acuity could safely address staffing shortages.