Cargando…

Fertility Preservation and Restoration Options for Pre-Pubertal Male Cancer Patients: Current Approaches

Fertility preservation for prepubertal male patients undergoing gonadotoxic therapies, potentially depleting spermatogonial cells, is an expanding necessity, yet most of the feasible options are still in the experimental phase. We present our experience and a summary of current and novel possibiliti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eugeni, Elena, Arato, Iva, Del Sordo, Rachele, Sidoni, Angelo, Garolla, Andrea, Ferlin, Alberto, Calafiore, Riccardo, Brancorsini, Stefano, Mancuso, Francesca, Luca, Giovanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9244702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35784573
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.877537
_version_ 1784738587123646464
author Eugeni, Elena
Arato, Iva
Del Sordo, Rachele
Sidoni, Angelo
Garolla, Andrea
Ferlin, Alberto
Calafiore, Riccardo
Brancorsini, Stefano
Mancuso, Francesca
Luca, Giovanni
author_facet Eugeni, Elena
Arato, Iva
Del Sordo, Rachele
Sidoni, Angelo
Garolla, Andrea
Ferlin, Alberto
Calafiore, Riccardo
Brancorsini, Stefano
Mancuso, Francesca
Luca, Giovanni
author_sort Eugeni, Elena
collection PubMed
description Fertility preservation for prepubertal male patients undergoing gonadotoxic therapies, potentially depleting spermatogonial cells, is an expanding necessity, yet most of the feasible options are still in the experimental phase. We present our experience and a summary of current and novel possibilities regarding the different strategies to protect or restore fertility in young male patients, before proceeding with chemotherapy or radiotherapy for malignances or other diseases. Adult oncological patients should always be counselled to cryopreserve the semen before starting treatment, however this approach is not suitable for prepubertal boys, who aren’t capable to produce sperm yet. Fortunately, since the survival rate of pediatric cancer patients has skyrocketed in the last decade and it’s over 84%, safeguarding their future fertility is becoming a major concern for reproductive medicine. Surgical and medical approaches to personalize treatment or protect the gonads could be a valid first step to take. Testicular tissue autologous grafting or xenografting, and spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) transplantation, are the main experimental options available, but spermatogenesis in vitro is becoming an intriguing alternative. All of these methods feature both strong and weak prospects. There is also relevant controversy regarding the type of testicular material to preserve and the cryopreservation methods. Since transplanted cells are bound to survive based on SSCs number, many ways to enrich their population in cultures have been proposed, as well as different sites of injection inside the testis. Testicular tissue graft has been experimented on mice, rabbits, rhesus macaques and porcine, allowing the birth of live offspring after performing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), however it has never been performed on human males yet. In vitro spermatogenesis remains a mirage, although many steps in the right direction have been performed. The manufacturing of 3D scaffolds and artificial spermatogenetic niche, providing support to stem cells in cultures, seems like the best way to further advance in this field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9244702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92447022022-07-01 Fertility Preservation and Restoration Options for Pre-Pubertal Male Cancer Patients: Current Approaches Eugeni, Elena Arato, Iva Del Sordo, Rachele Sidoni, Angelo Garolla, Andrea Ferlin, Alberto Calafiore, Riccardo Brancorsini, Stefano Mancuso, Francesca Luca, Giovanni Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology Fertility preservation for prepubertal male patients undergoing gonadotoxic therapies, potentially depleting spermatogonial cells, is an expanding necessity, yet most of the feasible options are still in the experimental phase. We present our experience and a summary of current and novel possibilities regarding the different strategies to protect or restore fertility in young male patients, before proceeding with chemotherapy or radiotherapy for malignances or other diseases. Adult oncological patients should always be counselled to cryopreserve the semen before starting treatment, however this approach is not suitable for prepubertal boys, who aren’t capable to produce sperm yet. Fortunately, since the survival rate of pediatric cancer patients has skyrocketed in the last decade and it’s over 84%, safeguarding their future fertility is becoming a major concern for reproductive medicine. Surgical and medical approaches to personalize treatment or protect the gonads could be a valid first step to take. Testicular tissue autologous grafting or xenografting, and spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) transplantation, are the main experimental options available, but spermatogenesis in vitro is becoming an intriguing alternative. All of these methods feature both strong and weak prospects. There is also relevant controversy regarding the type of testicular material to preserve and the cryopreservation methods. Since transplanted cells are bound to survive based on SSCs number, many ways to enrich their population in cultures have been proposed, as well as different sites of injection inside the testis. Testicular tissue graft has been experimented on mice, rabbits, rhesus macaques and porcine, allowing the birth of live offspring after performing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), however it has never been performed on human males yet. In vitro spermatogenesis remains a mirage, although many steps in the right direction have been performed. The manufacturing of 3D scaffolds and artificial spermatogenetic niche, providing support to stem cells in cultures, seems like the best way to further advance in this field. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9244702/ /pubmed/35784573 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.877537 Text en Copyright © 2022 Eugeni, Arato, Del Sordo, Sidoni, Garolla, Ferlin, Calafiore, Brancorsini, Mancuso and Luca https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Eugeni, Elena
Arato, Iva
Del Sordo, Rachele
Sidoni, Angelo
Garolla, Andrea
Ferlin, Alberto
Calafiore, Riccardo
Brancorsini, Stefano
Mancuso, Francesca
Luca, Giovanni
Fertility Preservation and Restoration Options for Pre-Pubertal Male Cancer Patients: Current Approaches
title Fertility Preservation and Restoration Options for Pre-Pubertal Male Cancer Patients: Current Approaches
title_full Fertility Preservation and Restoration Options for Pre-Pubertal Male Cancer Patients: Current Approaches
title_fullStr Fertility Preservation and Restoration Options for Pre-Pubertal Male Cancer Patients: Current Approaches
title_full_unstemmed Fertility Preservation and Restoration Options for Pre-Pubertal Male Cancer Patients: Current Approaches
title_short Fertility Preservation and Restoration Options for Pre-Pubertal Male Cancer Patients: Current Approaches
title_sort fertility preservation and restoration options for pre-pubertal male cancer patients: current approaches
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9244702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35784573
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.877537
work_keys_str_mv AT eugenielena fertilitypreservationandrestorationoptionsforprepubertalmalecancerpatientscurrentapproaches
AT aratoiva fertilitypreservationandrestorationoptionsforprepubertalmalecancerpatientscurrentapproaches
AT delsordorachele fertilitypreservationandrestorationoptionsforprepubertalmalecancerpatientscurrentapproaches
AT sidoniangelo fertilitypreservationandrestorationoptionsforprepubertalmalecancerpatientscurrentapproaches
AT garollaandrea fertilitypreservationandrestorationoptionsforprepubertalmalecancerpatientscurrentapproaches
AT ferlinalberto fertilitypreservationandrestorationoptionsforprepubertalmalecancerpatientscurrentapproaches
AT calafiorericcardo fertilitypreservationandrestorationoptionsforprepubertalmalecancerpatientscurrentapproaches
AT brancorsinistefano fertilitypreservationandrestorationoptionsforprepubertalmalecancerpatientscurrentapproaches
AT mancusofrancesca fertilitypreservationandrestorationoptionsforprepubertalmalecancerpatientscurrentapproaches
AT lucagiovanni fertilitypreservationandrestorationoptionsforprepubertalmalecancerpatientscurrentapproaches