Cargando…
Clinical relevance of endoscopic peri-appendiceal red patch in ulcerative colitis patients
BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence is suggesting appendectomy as an alternative treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC), especially in case of histological appendiceal inflammation. Therefore, preoperative identification of appendiceal inflammation could be beneficial. This study aimed to assess the prev...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9244917/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35784194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848221098849 |
_version_ | 1784738632206123008 |
---|---|
author | Reijntjes, Maud A. Heuthorst, Lianne Gecse, Krisztina Mookhoek, Aart Bemelman, Willem A. Buskens, Christianne J. |
author_facet | Reijntjes, Maud A. Heuthorst, Lianne Gecse, Krisztina Mookhoek, Aart Bemelman, Willem A. Buskens, Christianne J. |
author_sort | Reijntjes, Maud A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence is suggesting appendectomy as an alternative treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC), especially in case of histological appendiceal inflammation. Therefore, preoperative identification of appendiceal inflammation could be beneficial. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of peri-appendiceal red patch (PARP) on colonoscopy. In addition, prognostic relevance of PARP for disease course and its predictive value for histological appendiceal inflammation in patients undergoing appendectomy was assessed. METHODS: UC patients undergoing colonoscopy in 2014/2015 were included to determine PARP-prevalence in a cross-sectional study. Findings were correlated to patient and disease characteristics, upscaling of treatment and colectomy rates after cross-sectional colonoscopy. In patients undergoing appendiceal resection, histopathological inflammation was assessed using the Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI). RESULTS: In total, 249 patients were included of which 17.7% (44/249) had a PARP. Patients with PARP were significantly younger with a shorter disease course. The majority of patients with PARP (61.4%) was in endoscopic remission. Patients with PARP required more upscaling of medical therapy (81.8% vs. 58.0%, p < 0.01), and more PARP patients underwent colectomy (13.6% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.04). Patients with PARP had a higher median RHI in resection specimens (14 vs. 7, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: PARP was present during colonoscopy regardless disease activity and was predominantly found in UC patients with younger age and shorter disease duration. PARP patients had a more severe course of UC, and in case of appendectomy, more severe histopathological appendiceal inflammation. Appendectomy as an experimental therapy for UC has been suggested to be predominantly effective in UC patients with appendiceal inflammation. This study demonstrates that presence of a PARP on colonoscopy predicts appendiceal inflammation. After consensus has been reached on the therapeutic effect of appendectomy, assessing PARP presence during colonoscopy could therefore contribute to identifying patients most likely to respond. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9244917 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92449172022-07-01 Clinical relevance of endoscopic peri-appendiceal red patch in ulcerative colitis patients Reijntjes, Maud A. Heuthorst, Lianne Gecse, Krisztina Mookhoek, Aart Bemelman, Willem A. Buskens, Christianne J. Therap Adv Gastroenterol Original Research BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence is suggesting appendectomy as an alternative treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC), especially in case of histological appendiceal inflammation. Therefore, preoperative identification of appendiceal inflammation could be beneficial. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of peri-appendiceal red patch (PARP) on colonoscopy. In addition, prognostic relevance of PARP for disease course and its predictive value for histological appendiceal inflammation in patients undergoing appendectomy was assessed. METHODS: UC patients undergoing colonoscopy in 2014/2015 were included to determine PARP-prevalence in a cross-sectional study. Findings were correlated to patient and disease characteristics, upscaling of treatment and colectomy rates after cross-sectional colonoscopy. In patients undergoing appendiceal resection, histopathological inflammation was assessed using the Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI). RESULTS: In total, 249 patients were included of which 17.7% (44/249) had a PARP. Patients with PARP were significantly younger with a shorter disease course. The majority of patients with PARP (61.4%) was in endoscopic remission. Patients with PARP required more upscaling of medical therapy (81.8% vs. 58.0%, p < 0.01), and more PARP patients underwent colectomy (13.6% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.04). Patients with PARP had a higher median RHI in resection specimens (14 vs. 7, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: PARP was present during colonoscopy regardless disease activity and was predominantly found in UC patients with younger age and shorter disease duration. PARP patients had a more severe course of UC, and in case of appendectomy, more severe histopathological appendiceal inflammation. Appendectomy as an experimental therapy for UC has been suggested to be predominantly effective in UC patients with appendiceal inflammation. This study demonstrates that presence of a PARP on colonoscopy predicts appendiceal inflammation. After consensus has been reached on the therapeutic effect of appendectomy, assessing PARP presence during colonoscopy could therefore contribute to identifying patients most likely to respond. SAGE Publications 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9244917/ /pubmed/35784194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848221098849 Text en © The Author(s), 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Reijntjes, Maud A. Heuthorst, Lianne Gecse, Krisztina Mookhoek, Aart Bemelman, Willem A. Buskens, Christianne J. Clinical relevance of endoscopic peri-appendiceal red patch in ulcerative colitis patients |
title | Clinical relevance of endoscopic peri-appendiceal red patch in ulcerative colitis patients |
title_full | Clinical relevance of endoscopic peri-appendiceal red patch in ulcerative colitis patients |
title_fullStr | Clinical relevance of endoscopic peri-appendiceal red patch in ulcerative colitis patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical relevance of endoscopic peri-appendiceal red patch in ulcerative colitis patients |
title_short | Clinical relevance of endoscopic peri-appendiceal red patch in ulcerative colitis patients |
title_sort | clinical relevance of endoscopic peri-appendiceal red patch in ulcerative colitis patients |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9244917/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35784194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848221098849 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reijntjesmauda clinicalrelevanceofendoscopicperiappendicealredpatchinulcerativecolitispatients AT heuthorstlianne clinicalrelevanceofendoscopicperiappendicealredpatchinulcerativecolitispatients AT gecsekrisztina clinicalrelevanceofendoscopicperiappendicealredpatchinulcerativecolitispatients AT mookhoekaart clinicalrelevanceofendoscopicperiappendicealredpatchinulcerativecolitispatients AT bemelmanwillema clinicalrelevanceofendoscopicperiappendicealredpatchinulcerativecolitispatients AT buskenschristiannej clinicalrelevanceofendoscopicperiappendicealredpatchinulcerativecolitispatients |