Cargando…
Interpregnancy interval after a miscarriage and obstetric outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy in a low-income setting, Nigeria: A cohort study
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine and compare the occurrence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in a cohort of pregnant women with interpregnancy interval of < and ⩾6 months (short and normal interpregnancy interval, respectively) following a spontaneous miscarriage in their last preg...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9244931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35784667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20503121221105589 |
_version_ | 1784738636063834112 |
---|---|
author | Lawani, Lucky Osaheni Enebe, Joseph Tochukwu Eze, Paul Igboke, Francis Nwabueze Ukaegbe, Chukwuemeka Ikeji Ugwu, Monica Omosivie Agu, Ujunwa Justina Onyinye, Enebe Nympha Iyoke, Chukwuemeka Anthony |
author_facet | Lawani, Lucky Osaheni Enebe, Joseph Tochukwu Eze, Paul Igboke, Francis Nwabueze Ukaegbe, Chukwuemeka Ikeji Ugwu, Monica Omosivie Agu, Ujunwa Justina Onyinye, Enebe Nympha Iyoke, Chukwuemeka Anthony |
author_sort | Lawani, Lucky Osaheni |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine and compare the occurrence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in a cohort of pregnant women with interpregnancy interval of < and ⩾6 months (short and normal interpregnancy interval, respectively) following a spontaneous miscarriage in their last pregnancies. METHODS: This was a cohort study that involved pregnant women with a spontaneous pregnancy loss in their last pregnancies. They were recruited at a gestational age of 13–15 weeks and followed up to determine the obstetric and foetal outcomes of their pregnancies at four tertiary hospitals in Nigeria from July 2018 to September 2019. Data collected were analysed using SPSS version 26.0. A Chi-square and multivariate logistic regression analysis were done, and a p-value of less than 0.05 was assumed to be statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 705 participants were studied, out of which 448 (63.5%) and 257 (36.5%) of the participants had short and normal interpregnancy interval after a spontaneous miscarriage. Over 80% of the participants had first-trimester pregnancy losses and were managed with manual vacuum aspiration in 73.3% of the cases. The majority, 87.5% for the normal interpregnancy interval cohort and 86.4% for the short interpregnancy interval cohort, had live births, while 8.5% and 10.1% of the women in the normal and short interpregnancy interval cohorts, respectively, had repeat miscarriages. There was no statistical difference in the occurrence of live births and repeat miscarriages between both cohorts (p > 0.05). There was no increased risk of occurrence of adverse foetomaternal outcomes in both groups (p > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that there was no statistical difference in the occurrence adverse foetomaternal outcomes between the studied cohorts (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the occurrence of adverse maternal and foetal outcomes in the cohorts of mothers with short and normal interpregnancy interval following miscarriages in their last previous pregnancies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9244931 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92449312022-07-01 Interpregnancy interval after a miscarriage and obstetric outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy in a low-income setting, Nigeria: A cohort study Lawani, Lucky Osaheni Enebe, Joseph Tochukwu Eze, Paul Igboke, Francis Nwabueze Ukaegbe, Chukwuemeka Ikeji Ugwu, Monica Omosivie Agu, Ujunwa Justina Onyinye, Enebe Nympha Iyoke, Chukwuemeka Anthony SAGE Open Med Original Research Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine and compare the occurrence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in a cohort of pregnant women with interpregnancy interval of < and ⩾6 months (short and normal interpregnancy interval, respectively) following a spontaneous miscarriage in their last pregnancies. METHODS: This was a cohort study that involved pregnant women with a spontaneous pregnancy loss in their last pregnancies. They were recruited at a gestational age of 13–15 weeks and followed up to determine the obstetric and foetal outcomes of their pregnancies at four tertiary hospitals in Nigeria from July 2018 to September 2019. Data collected were analysed using SPSS version 26.0. A Chi-square and multivariate logistic regression analysis were done, and a p-value of less than 0.05 was assumed to be statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 705 participants were studied, out of which 448 (63.5%) and 257 (36.5%) of the participants had short and normal interpregnancy interval after a spontaneous miscarriage. Over 80% of the participants had first-trimester pregnancy losses and were managed with manual vacuum aspiration in 73.3% of the cases. The majority, 87.5% for the normal interpregnancy interval cohort and 86.4% for the short interpregnancy interval cohort, had live births, while 8.5% and 10.1% of the women in the normal and short interpregnancy interval cohorts, respectively, had repeat miscarriages. There was no statistical difference in the occurrence of live births and repeat miscarriages between both cohorts (p > 0.05). There was no increased risk of occurrence of adverse foetomaternal outcomes in both groups (p > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that there was no statistical difference in the occurrence adverse foetomaternal outcomes between the studied cohorts (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the occurrence of adverse maternal and foetal outcomes in the cohorts of mothers with short and normal interpregnancy interval following miscarriages in their last previous pregnancies. SAGE Publications 2022-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9244931/ /pubmed/35784667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20503121221105589 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Lawani, Lucky Osaheni Enebe, Joseph Tochukwu Eze, Paul Igboke, Francis Nwabueze Ukaegbe, Chukwuemeka Ikeji Ugwu, Monica Omosivie Agu, Ujunwa Justina Onyinye, Enebe Nympha Iyoke, Chukwuemeka Anthony Interpregnancy interval after a miscarriage and obstetric outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy in a low-income setting, Nigeria: A cohort study |
title | Interpregnancy interval after a miscarriage and obstetric outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy in a low-income setting, Nigeria: A cohort study |
title_full | Interpregnancy interval after a miscarriage and obstetric outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy in a low-income setting, Nigeria: A cohort study |
title_fullStr | Interpregnancy interval after a miscarriage and obstetric outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy in a low-income setting, Nigeria: A cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Interpregnancy interval after a miscarriage and obstetric outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy in a low-income setting, Nigeria: A cohort study |
title_short | Interpregnancy interval after a miscarriage and obstetric outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy in a low-income setting, Nigeria: A cohort study |
title_sort | interpregnancy interval after a miscarriage and obstetric outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy in a low-income setting, nigeria: a cohort study |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9244931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35784667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20503121221105589 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lawaniluckyosaheni interpregnancyintervalafteramiscarriageandobstetricoutcomesinthesubsequentpregnancyinalowincomesettingnigeriaacohortstudy AT enebejosephtochukwu interpregnancyintervalafteramiscarriageandobstetricoutcomesinthesubsequentpregnancyinalowincomesettingnigeriaacohortstudy AT ezepaul interpregnancyintervalafteramiscarriageandobstetricoutcomesinthesubsequentpregnancyinalowincomesettingnigeriaacohortstudy AT igbokefrancisnwabueze interpregnancyintervalafteramiscarriageandobstetricoutcomesinthesubsequentpregnancyinalowincomesettingnigeriaacohortstudy AT ukaegbechukwuemekaikeji interpregnancyintervalafteramiscarriageandobstetricoutcomesinthesubsequentpregnancyinalowincomesettingnigeriaacohortstudy AT ugwumonicaomosivie interpregnancyintervalafteramiscarriageandobstetricoutcomesinthesubsequentpregnancyinalowincomesettingnigeriaacohortstudy AT aguujunwajustina interpregnancyintervalafteramiscarriageandobstetricoutcomesinthesubsequentpregnancyinalowincomesettingnigeriaacohortstudy AT onyinyeenebenympha interpregnancyintervalafteramiscarriageandobstetricoutcomesinthesubsequentpregnancyinalowincomesettingnigeriaacohortstudy AT iyokechukwuemekaanthony interpregnancyintervalafteramiscarriageandobstetricoutcomesinthesubsequentpregnancyinalowincomesettingnigeriaacohortstudy |