Cargando…
Role of joint aspiration before re-implantation in patients with a cement spacer in place
BACKGROUND: The usefulness of a mandatory joint aspiration before re-implantation in patients with a cement spacer already in place is unclear. AIM: To evaluate the role of culturing synovial fluid obtained by joint aspiration before re-implantation in patients who underwent a two-stage septic revis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9244963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35949711 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i6.615 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: The usefulness of a mandatory joint aspiration before re-implantation in patients with a cement spacer already in place is unclear. AIM: To evaluate the role of culturing synovial fluid obtained by joint aspiration before re-implantation in patients who underwent a two-stage septic revision. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted, including patients that underwent a two-stage septic revision (hip or knee) from 2010 to 2017. After the first stage revision and according to intraoperative culture results, all patients were treated with an antibiotic protocol for 6-8 wk. Following 2 wk without antibiotics, a culture of synovial fluid was obtained. The results of these cultures were recorded and compared with cultures obtained during re-implantation surgery. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (20 hip and 21 knee spacers) were included in the final analysis. In 39 cases, the culture of synovial fluid was negative, while in the remaining 2 cases (knee spacers) no analysis was possible due to dry tap. In 5 of the patients, two or more intraoperative cultures taken during the re-implantation surgery were positive. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence to support mandatory joint aspiration before re-implantation in patients with a cement spacer in place. |
---|