Cargando…

Comparative Severity Assessment of Genetic, Stress-Based, and Pharmacological Mouse Models of Depression

The use of animals in neurosciences is pivotal to gaining insights into complex functions and dysfunctions of behavior. For example, various forms of physical and/or psychological stress are inherent to various animal models for psychiatric disorders, e.g., depression. Regarding animal welfare, it w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mallien, Anne Stephanie, Pfeiffer, Natascha, Brandwein, Christiane, Inta, Dragos, Sprengel, Rolf, Palme, Rupert, Talbot, Steven R., Gass, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35783227
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2022.908366
_version_ 1784738660403380224
author Mallien, Anne Stephanie
Pfeiffer, Natascha
Brandwein, Christiane
Inta, Dragos
Sprengel, Rolf
Palme, Rupert
Talbot, Steven R.
Gass, Peter
author_facet Mallien, Anne Stephanie
Pfeiffer, Natascha
Brandwein, Christiane
Inta, Dragos
Sprengel, Rolf
Palme, Rupert
Talbot, Steven R.
Gass, Peter
author_sort Mallien, Anne Stephanie
collection PubMed
description The use of animals in neurosciences is pivotal to gaining insights into complex functions and dysfunctions of behavior. For example, various forms of physical and/or psychological stress are inherent to various animal models for psychiatric disorders, e.g., depression. Regarding animal welfare, it would be mandatory to use models that inflict the least amount of stress necessary to address the underlying scientific question. This study compared the severity of different approaches to induce depression in mice: mutagenesis in GluA1 knockout, immobilization stress, and stress-induction via stress hormone treatment. While genetic alterations potentially represent a lifelong burden, the temporary intervention only affects the animals for a limited time. Therefore, we used home cage-based behavioral and physiological parameters, including nest building, burrowing, body weight, and fecal corticosterone metabolites, to determine the well-being of male and female mice. In addition, we performed an evidence-based estimate of severity using a composite score for relative severity assessment (RELSA) with this data. We found that even though restraint stress and supplementation of corticosterone in the diet both aimed at depression-related precipitating stress effects, the latter affected the well-being much stronger, especially in females. Restraint leads to less noticeable well-being impairments but causes depression-associated anhedonic behavior. Mice of both sexes recovered well from the stress treatment. GluA1 KO and their littermates showed diminished well-being, comparable to the immobilization experiments. However, since this is a lifelong condition, this burden is not reversible and potentially accumulative. In line with the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement), the process of choosing the most suitable model should ideally include an evidence-based severity assessment to be able to opt for the least severe alternative, which still induces the desired effect. Promoting refinement, in our study, this would be the restraint stress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9245036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92450362022-07-01 Comparative Severity Assessment of Genetic, Stress-Based, and Pharmacological Mouse Models of Depression Mallien, Anne Stephanie Pfeiffer, Natascha Brandwein, Christiane Inta, Dragos Sprengel, Rolf Palme, Rupert Talbot, Steven R. Gass, Peter Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience The use of animals in neurosciences is pivotal to gaining insights into complex functions and dysfunctions of behavior. For example, various forms of physical and/or psychological stress are inherent to various animal models for psychiatric disorders, e.g., depression. Regarding animal welfare, it would be mandatory to use models that inflict the least amount of stress necessary to address the underlying scientific question. This study compared the severity of different approaches to induce depression in mice: mutagenesis in GluA1 knockout, immobilization stress, and stress-induction via stress hormone treatment. While genetic alterations potentially represent a lifelong burden, the temporary intervention only affects the animals for a limited time. Therefore, we used home cage-based behavioral and physiological parameters, including nest building, burrowing, body weight, and fecal corticosterone metabolites, to determine the well-being of male and female mice. In addition, we performed an evidence-based estimate of severity using a composite score for relative severity assessment (RELSA) with this data. We found that even though restraint stress and supplementation of corticosterone in the diet both aimed at depression-related precipitating stress effects, the latter affected the well-being much stronger, especially in females. Restraint leads to less noticeable well-being impairments but causes depression-associated anhedonic behavior. Mice of both sexes recovered well from the stress treatment. GluA1 KO and their littermates showed diminished well-being, comparable to the immobilization experiments. However, since this is a lifelong condition, this burden is not reversible and potentially accumulative. In line with the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement), the process of choosing the most suitable model should ideally include an evidence-based severity assessment to be able to opt for the least severe alternative, which still induces the desired effect. Promoting refinement, in our study, this would be the restraint stress. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9245036/ /pubmed/35783227 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2022.908366 Text en Copyright © 2022 Mallien, Pfeiffer, Brandwein, Inta, Sprengel, Palme, Talbot and Gass. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Mallien, Anne Stephanie
Pfeiffer, Natascha
Brandwein, Christiane
Inta, Dragos
Sprengel, Rolf
Palme, Rupert
Talbot, Steven R.
Gass, Peter
Comparative Severity Assessment of Genetic, Stress-Based, and Pharmacological Mouse Models of Depression
title Comparative Severity Assessment of Genetic, Stress-Based, and Pharmacological Mouse Models of Depression
title_full Comparative Severity Assessment of Genetic, Stress-Based, and Pharmacological Mouse Models of Depression
title_fullStr Comparative Severity Assessment of Genetic, Stress-Based, and Pharmacological Mouse Models of Depression
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Severity Assessment of Genetic, Stress-Based, and Pharmacological Mouse Models of Depression
title_short Comparative Severity Assessment of Genetic, Stress-Based, and Pharmacological Mouse Models of Depression
title_sort comparative severity assessment of genetic, stress-based, and pharmacological mouse models of depression
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35783227
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2022.908366
work_keys_str_mv AT mallienannestephanie comparativeseverityassessmentofgeneticstressbasedandpharmacologicalmousemodelsofdepression
AT pfeiffernatascha comparativeseverityassessmentofgeneticstressbasedandpharmacologicalmousemodelsofdepression
AT brandweinchristiane comparativeseverityassessmentofgeneticstressbasedandpharmacologicalmousemodelsofdepression
AT intadragos comparativeseverityassessmentofgeneticstressbasedandpharmacologicalmousemodelsofdepression
AT sprengelrolf comparativeseverityassessmentofgeneticstressbasedandpharmacologicalmousemodelsofdepression
AT palmerupert comparativeseverityassessmentofgeneticstressbasedandpharmacologicalmousemodelsofdepression
AT talbotstevenr comparativeseverityassessmentofgeneticstressbasedandpharmacologicalmousemodelsofdepression
AT gasspeter comparativeseverityassessmentofgeneticstressbasedandpharmacologicalmousemodelsofdepression