Cargando…

A Comprehensive Prognostic Model for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: For patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLMs), it is important to stratify patients according to the risk of recurrence. This study aimed to validate the predictive value of some clinical, imaging, and pathology biomarkers and develop an operational prognostic model for pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Zhenyuan, Han, Xin, Sun, Diandian, Liang, Zhiying, Wu, Wei, Ju, Haixing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35785215
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.855915
_version_ 1784738668177522688
author Zhou, Zhenyuan
Han, Xin
Sun, Diandian
Liang, Zhiying
Wu, Wei
Ju, Haixing
author_facet Zhou, Zhenyuan
Han, Xin
Sun, Diandian
Liang, Zhiying
Wu, Wei
Ju, Haixing
author_sort Zhou, Zhenyuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLMs), it is important to stratify patients according to the risk of recurrence. This study aimed to validate the predictive value of some clinical, imaging, and pathology biomarkers and develop an operational prognostic model for patients with CRLMs with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before the liver resection. METHODS: Patients with CRLMs accompanied with primary lesion and liver metastases lesion resection were enrolled into this study. A nomogram based on independent risk factors was identified by Kaplan–Meier analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis. The predictive ability was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curve analysis (DCA). Calibration plot were also used to explore the consistency between prediction and reality. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were enrolled into the study. Multivariable Cox analysis found that histopathological growth patterns (HGPs) [Hazard Rate (HR) = 2.130], radiology response (stable disease vs. partial response, HR = 2.207; progressive disease vs. partial response, HR = 3.824), lymph node status (HR = 1.442), and age (HR = 0.576) were independent risk factors for disease-free survival (DFS) (p < 0.05). Corresponding nomogram was constructed on the basis of the above factors, demonstrating that scores ranging from 5 to 11 presented better prognosis than the scores of 0–4 (median DFS = 14.3 vs. 4.9 months, p < 0.0001). The area under ROC curves of the model for 1-, 2-, and 3-year DFS were 0.754, 0.705, and 0.666, respectively, and DCA confirmed that the risk model showed more clinical benefits than clinical risk score. Calibration plot for the probability of DFS at 1 or 3 years verified an optimal agreement between prediction and actual observation. In the course of our research, compared with pure NACT, a higher proportion of desmoplastic HGP (dHGP) was detected in patients treated with NACT plus cetuximab (p = 0.030), and the use of cetuximab was an independent factor for decreased replacement HGP (rHGP) and increased dHGP (p = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Our model is concise, comprehensive, and high efficient, which may contribute to better predicting the prognosis of patients with CRLMs with NACT before the liver resection. In addition, we observed an unbalanced distribution of HGPs as well.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9245066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92450662022-07-01 A Comprehensive Prognostic Model for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Zhou, Zhenyuan Han, Xin Sun, Diandian Liang, Zhiying Wu, Wei Ju, Haixing Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: For patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLMs), it is important to stratify patients according to the risk of recurrence. This study aimed to validate the predictive value of some clinical, imaging, and pathology biomarkers and develop an operational prognostic model for patients with CRLMs with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before the liver resection. METHODS: Patients with CRLMs accompanied with primary lesion and liver metastases lesion resection were enrolled into this study. A nomogram based on independent risk factors was identified by Kaplan–Meier analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis. The predictive ability was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curve analysis (DCA). Calibration plot were also used to explore the consistency between prediction and reality. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were enrolled into the study. Multivariable Cox analysis found that histopathological growth patterns (HGPs) [Hazard Rate (HR) = 2.130], radiology response (stable disease vs. partial response, HR = 2.207; progressive disease vs. partial response, HR = 3.824), lymph node status (HR = 1.442), and age (HR = 0.576) were independent risk factors for disease-free survival (DFS) (p < 0.05). Corresponding nomogram was constructed on the basis of the above factors, demonstrating that scores ranging from 5 to 11 presented better prognosis than the scores of 0–4 (median DFS = 14.3 vs. 4.9 months, p < 0.0001). The area under ROC curves of the model for 1-, 2-, and 3-year DFS were 0.754, 0.705, and 0.666, respectively, and DCA confirmed that the risk model showed more clinical benefits than clinical risk score. Calibration plot for the probability of DFS at 1 or 3 years verified an optimal agreement between prediction and actual observation. In the course of our research, compared with pure NACT, a higher proportion of desmoplastic HGP (dHGP) was detected in patients treated with NACT plus cetuximab (p = 0.030), and the use of cetuximab was an independent factor for decreased replacement HGP (rHGP) and increased dHGP (p = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Our model is concise, comprehensive, and high efficient, which may contribute to better predicting the prognosis of patients with CRLMs with NACT before the liver resection. In addition, we observed an unbalanced distribution of HGPs as well. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9245066/ /pubmed/35785215 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.855915 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhou, Han, Sun, Liang, Wu and Ju https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Zhou, Zhenyuan
Han, Xin
Sun, Diandian
Liang, Zhiying
Wu, Wei
Ju, Haixing
A Comprehensive Prognostic Model for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title A Comprehensive Prognostic Model for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title_full A Comprehensive Prognostic Model for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title_fullStr A Comprehensive Prognostic Model for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed A Comprehensive Prognostic Model for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title_short A Comprehensive Prognostic Model for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
title_sort comprehensive prognostic model for colorectal cancer liver metastasis recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35785215
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.855915
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouzhenyuan acomprehensiveprognosticmodelforcolorectalcancerlivermetastasisrecurrenceafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT hanxin acomprehensiveprognosticmodelforcolorectalcancerlivermetastasisrecurrenceafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT sundiandian acomprehensiveprognosticmodelforcolorectalcancerlivermetastasisrecurrenceafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT liangzhiying acomprehensiveprognosticmodelforcolorectalcancerlivermetastasisrecurrenceafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT wuwei acomprehensiveprognosticmodelforcolorectalcancerlivermetastasisrecurrenceafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT juhaixing acomprehensiveprognosticmodelforcolorectalcancerlivermetastasisrecurrenceafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT zhouzhenyuan comprehensiveprognosticmodelforcolorectalcancerlivermetastasisrecurrenceafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT hanxin comprehensiveprognosticmodelforcolorectalcancerlivermetastasisrecurrenceafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT sundiandian comprehensiveprognosticmodelforcolorectalcancerlivermetastasisrecurrenceafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT liangzhiying comprehensiveprognosticmodelforcolorectalcancerlivermetastasisrecurrenceafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT wuwei comprehensiveprognosticmodelforcolorectalcancerlivermetastasisrecurrenceafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT juhaixing comprehensiveprognosticmodelforcolorectalcancerlivermetastasisrecurrenceafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy