Cargando…

A review of guidelines on anticoagulation reversal across different clinical scenarios – Is there a general consensus?

Anticoagulation is key to the treatment/prevention of thromboembolic events. The primary complication of anticoagulation is serious or life-threatening hemorrhage, which may necessitate prompt anticoagulation reversal; this could also be required for nonbleeding patients requiring urgent/emergent in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Milling, Truman J., Pollack, Charles V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32750627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.05.086
_version_ 1784738681174622208
author Milling, Truman J.
Pollack, Charles V.
author_facet Milling, Truman J.
Pollack, Charles V.
author_sort Milling, Truman J.
collection PubMed
description Anticoagulation is key to the treatment/prevention of thromboembolic events. The primary complication of anticoagulation is serious or life-threatening hemorrhage, which may necessitate prompt anticoagulation reversal; this could also be required for nonbleeding patients requiring urgent/emergent invasive procedures. The decision to reverse anticoagulation should weigh the benefit–risk ratio of supporting hemostasis versus post-reversal thrombosis. We appraise the available guidelines/recommendations for vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) reversal in the management of major bleeding, and also assess recent clinical data that may not yet be reflected in official guidance. In general, available guidelines are consistent in their recommendations, advocating administration of vitamin K and 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4F-PCCs) rather than fresh frozen plasma to patients with VKA-associated intracranial hemorrhage and life-threatening bleeding, and specific reversal agents as essential therapy for DOAC reversal in those same severe conditions. However, guidelines also recommend off-label use of PCCs for DOAC reversal when specific reversal agents are unavailable. Limited recent evidence generally support the latter recommendation, but guidelines are likely to evolve as more data become available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9245126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92451262022-06-30 A review of guidelines on anticoagulation reversal across different clinical scenarios – Is there a general consensus? Milling, Truman J. Pollack, Charles V. Am J Emerg Med Article Anticoagulation is key to the treatment/prevention of thromboembolic events. The primary complication of anticoagulation is serious or life-threatening hemorrhage, which may necessitate prompt anticoagulation reversal; this could also be required for nonbleeding patients requiring urgent/emergent invasive procedures. The decision to reverse anticoagulation should weigh the benefit–risk ratio of supporting hemostasis versus post-reversal thrombosis. We appraise the available guidelines/recommendations for vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) reversal in the management of major bleeding, and also assess recent clinical data that may not yet be reflected in official guidance. In general, available guidelines are consistent in their recommendations, advocating administration of vitamin K and 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4F-PCCs) rather than fresh frozen plasma to patients with VKA-associated intracranial hemorrhage and life-threatening bleeding, and specific reversal agents as essential therapy for DOAC reversal in those same severe conditions. However, guidelines also recommend off-label use of PCCs for DOAC reversal when specific reversal agents are unavailable. Limited recent evidence generally support the latter recommendation, but guidelines are likely to evolve as more data become available. 2020-09 2020-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9245126/ /pubmed/32750627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.05.086 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Milling, Truman J.
Pollack, Charles V.
A review of guidelines on anticoagulation reversal across different clinical scenarios – Is there a general consensus?
title A review of guidelines on anticoagulation reversal across different clinical scenarios – Is there a general consensus?
title_full A review of guidelines on anticoagulation reversal across different clinical scenarios – Is there a general consensus?
title_fullStr A review of guidelines on anticoagulation reversal across different clinical scenarios – Is there a general consensus?
title_full_unstemmed A review of guidelines on anticoagulation reversal across different clinical scenarios – Is there a general consensus?
title_short A review of guidelines on anticoagulation reversal across different clinical scenarios – Is there a general consensus?
title_sort review of guidelines on anticoagulation reversal across different clinical scenarios – is there a general consensus?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32750627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.05.086
work_keys_str_mv AT millingtrumanj areviewofguidelinesonanticoagulationreversalacrossdifferentclinicalscenariosisthereageneralconsensus
AT pollackcharlesv areviewofguidelinesonanticoagulationreversalacrossdifferentclinicalscenariosisthereageneralconsensus
AT millingtrumanj reviewofguidelinesonanticoagulationreversalacrossdifferentclinicalscenariosisthereageneralconsensus
AT pollackcharlesv reviewofguidelinesonanticoagulationreversalacrossdifferentclinicalscenariosisthereageneralconsensus