Cargando…

Revisiting the seven pillars of RDoC

BACKGROUND: In 2013, a few years after the launch of the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative, Cuthbert and Insel published a paper titled “Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC.” The RDoC project is a translational research...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morris, Sarah E., Sanislow, Charles A., Pacheco, Jenni, Vaidyanathan, Uma, Gordon, Joshua A., Cuthbert, Bruce N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35768815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02414-0
_version_ 1784738717017047040
author Morris, Sarah E.
Sanislow, Charles A.
Pacheco, Jenni
Vaidyanathan, Uma
Gordon, Joshua A.
Cuthbert, Bruce N.
author_facet Morris, Sarah E.
Sanislow, Charles A.
Pacheco, Jenni
Vaidyanathan, Uma
Gordon, Joshua A.
Cuthbert, Bruce N.
author_sort Morris, Sarah E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2013, a few years after the launch of the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative, Cuthbert and Insel published a paper titled “Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC.” The RDoC project is a translational research effort to encourage new ways of studying psychopathology through a focus on disruptions in normal functions (such as reward learning or attention) that are defined jointly by observable behavior and neurobiological measures. The paper outlined the principles of the RDoC research framework, including emphases on research that acquires data from multiple measurement classes to foster integrative analyses, adopts dimensional approaches, and employs novel methods for ascertaining participants and identifying valid subgroups. DISCUSSION: To mark the first decade of the RDoC initiative, we revisit the seven pillars and highlight new research findings and updates to the framework that are related to each. This reappraisal emphasizes the flexible nature of the RDoC framework and its application in diverse areas of research, new findings related to the importance of developmental trajectories within and across neurobehavioral domains, and the value of computational approaches for clarifying complex multivariate relations among behavioral and neurobiological systems. CONCLUSION: The seven pillars of RDoC have provided a foundation that has helped to guide a surge of new studies that have examined neurobehavioral domains related to mental disorders, in the service of informing future psychiatric nosology. Building on this footing, future areas of emphasis for the RDoC project will include studying central-peripheral interactions, developing novel approaches to phenotyping for genomic studies, and identifying new targets for clinical trial research to facilitate progress in precision psychiatry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9245309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92453092022-07-01 Revisiting the seven pillars of RDoC Morris, Sarah E. Sanislow, Charles A. Pacheco, Jenni Vaidyanathan, Uma Gordon, Joshua A. Cuthbert, Bruce N. BMC Med Debate BACKGROUND: In 2013, a few years after the launch of the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative, Cuthbert and Insel published a paper titled “Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC.” The RDoC project is a translational research effort to encourage new ways of studying psychopathology through a focus on disruptions in normal functions (such as reward learning or attention) that are defined jointly by observable behavior and neurobiological measures. The paper outlined the principles of the RDoC research framework, including emphases on research that acquires data from multiple measurement classes to foster integrative analyses, adopts dimensional approaches, and employs novel methods for ascertaining participants and identifying valid subgroups. DISCUSSION: To mark the first decade of the RDoC initiative, we revisit the seven pillars and highlight new research findings and updates to the framework that are related to each. This reappraisal emphasizes the flexible nature of the RDoC framework and its application in diverse areas of research, new findings related to the importance of developmental trajectories within and across neurobehavioral domains, and the value of computational approaches for clarifying complex multivariate relations among behavioral and neurobiological systems. CONCLUSION: The seven pillars of RDoC have provided a foundation that has helped to guide a surge of new studies that have examined neurobehavioral domains related to mental disorders, in the service of informing future psychiatric nosology. Building on this footing, future areas of emphasis for the RDoC project will include studying central-peripheral interactions, developing novel approaches to phenotyping for genomic studies, and identifying new targets for clinical trial research to facilitate progress in precision psychiatry. BioMed Central 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9245309/ /pubmed/35768815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02414-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Debate
Morris, Sarah E.
Sanislow, Charles A.
Pacheco, Jenni
Vaidyanathan, Uma
Gordon, Joshua A.
Cuthbert, Bruce N.
Revisiting the seven pillars of RDoC
title Revisiting the seven pillars of RDoC
title_full Revisiting the seven pillars of RDoC
title_fullStr Revisiting the seven pillars of RDoC
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting the seven pillars of RDoC
title_short Revisiting the seven pillars of RDoC
title_sort revisiting the seven pillars of rdoc
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35768815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02414-0
work_keys_str_mv AT morrissarahe revisitingthesevenpillarsofrdoc
AT sanislowcharlesa revisitingthesevenpillarsofrdoc
AT pachecojenni revisitingthesevenpillarsofrdoc
AT vaidyanathanuma revisitingthesevenpillarsofrdoc
AT gordonjoshuaa revisitingthesevenpillarsofrdoc
AT cuthbertbrucen revisitingthesevenpillarsofrdoc