Cargando…
Quality of systematic reviews of COVID-19 in people with diabetes: A systematic review
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the methodological quality of published systematic reviews of factors associated with COVID-19 in people with diabetes. METHOD: Systematic review with registration protocol in PROSPERO, under the number CRD42020222418. Searches were carried out from October to November 2020...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier España, S.L.U.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35781065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcle.2022.06.004 |
_version_ | 1784738732421677056 |
---|---|
author | Santos-Marques, Jaciane de Oliveira-Meneses, Marilyse Tavares-Gomes, Aline Rangel-Andrade, Elaine Maria Leite Martinez-Riera, José Ramón Silva-Júnior, Fernando Lopes e |
author_facet | Santos-Marques, Jaciane de Oliveira-Meneses, Marilyse Tavares-Gomes, Aline Rangel-Andrade, Elaine Maria Leite Martinez-Riera, José Ramón Silva-Júnior, Fernando Lopes e |
author_sort | Santos-Marques, Jaciane |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate the methodological quality of published systematic reviews of factors associated with COVID-19 in people with diabetes. METHOD: Systematic review with registration protocol in PROSPERO, under the number CRD42020222418. Searches were carried out from October to November 2020 in the databases of the MedLine, Web of Science, Scopus, Lilacs, Embase and Cochrane libraries, in addition to searching the reference list of the selected studies. Systematic review studies with or without meta-analysis and without date and language restrictions were included. Data were extracted in a standardized way and the quality of the studies was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews scale. RESULTS: Twelve reviews, published between 2020 and 2021, with a predominance of the English language, systematic reviews of observational studies with meta-analysis with a sample ranging from six to 83 studies, were included. Regarding financing, most of the study reported did not receive this type of support. Regarding to the assessment of the methodological quality of the studies, three were of moderate quality, five were classified as low quality and three with critically low quality. CONCLUSIONS: The analyzed articles presented a bias in the preparation of reports on their studies, suggesting the need to use mechanisms to improve adherence to the established reporting guidelines and methodological evaluation tools. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9245391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier España, S.L.U. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92453912022-07-01 Quality of systematic reviews of COVID-19 in people with diabetes: A systematic review Santos-Marques, Jaciane de Oliveira-Meneses, Marilyse Tavares-Gomes, Aline Rangel-Andrade, Elaine Maria Leite Martinez-Riera, José Ramón Silva-Júnior, Fernando Lopes e Enferm Clin (Engl Ed) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate the methodological quality of published systematic reviews of factors associated with COVID-19 in people with diabetes. METHOD: Systematic review with registration protocol in PROSPERO, under the number CRD42020222418. Searches were carried out from October to November 2020 in the databases of the MedLine, Web of Science, Scopus, Lilacs, Embase and Cochrane libraries, in addition to searching the reference list of the selected studies. Systematic review studies with or without meta-analysis and without date and language restrictions were included. Data were extracted in a standardized way and the quality of the studies was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews scale. RESULTS: Twelve reviews, published between 2020 and 2021, with a predominance of the English language, systematic reviews of observational studies with meta-analysis with a sample ranging from six to 83 studies, were included. Regarding financing, most of the study reported did not receive this type of support. Regarding to the assessment of the methodological quality of the studies, three were of moderate quality, five were classified as low quality and three with critically low quality. CONCLUSIONS: The analyzed articles presented a bias in the preparation of reports on their studies, suggesting the need to use mechanisms to improve adherence to the established reporting guidelines and methodological evaluation tools. Elsevier España, S.L.U. 2022 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9245391/ /pubmed/35781065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcle.2022.06.004 Text en © 2022 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Santos-Marques, Jaciane de Oliveira-Meneses, Marilyse Tavares-Gomes, Aline Rangel-Andrade, Elaine Maria Leite Martinez-Riera, José Ramón Silva-Júnior, Fernando Lopes e Quality of systematic reviews of COVID-19 in people with diabetes: A systematic review |
title | Quality of systematic reviews of COVID-19 in people with diabetes: A systematic review |
title_full | Quality of systematic reviews of COVID-19 in people with diabetes: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Quality of systematic reviews of COVID-19 in people with diabetes: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality of systematic reviews of COVID-19 in people with diabetes: A systematic review |
title_short | Quality of systematic reviews of COVID-19 in people with diabetes: A systematic review |
title_sort | quality of systematic reviews of covid-19 in people with diabetes: a systematic review |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35781065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcle.2022.06.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT santosmarquesjaciane qualityofsystematicreviewsofcovid19inpeoplewithdiabetesasystematicreview AT deoliveiramenesesmarilyse qualityofsystematicreviewsofcovid19inpeoplewithdiabetesasystematicreview AT tavaresgomesaline qualityofsystematicreviewsofcovid19inpeoplewithdiabetesasystematicreview AT rangelandradeelainemarialeite qualityofsystematicreviewsofcovid19inpeoplewithdiabetesasystematicreview AT martinezrierajoseramon qualityofsystematicreviewsofcovid19inpeoplewithdiabetesasystematicreview AT silvajuniorfernandolopese qualityofsystematicreviewsofcovid19inpeoplewithdiabetesasystematicreview |