Cargando…

Public Perceptions Regarding Genomic Technologies Applied to Breeding Farm Animals: A Qualitative Study

The societal acceptability of different applications of genomic technologies to animal production systems will determine whether their innovation trajectories will reach the commercialisation stage. Importantly, technological implementation and commercialisation trajectories, regulation, and policy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naab, Francis Z., Coles, David, Goddard, Ellen, Frewer, Lynn J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35822802
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biotech10040028
_version_ 1784738748287680512
author Naab, Francis Z.
Coles, David
Goddard, Ellen
Frewer, Lynn J.
author_facet Naab, Francis Z.
Coles, David
Goddard, Ellen
Frewer, Lynn J.
author_sort Naab, Francis Z.
collection PubMed
description The societal acceptability of different applications of genomic technologies to animal production systems will determine whether their innovation trajectories will reach the commercialisation stage. Importantly, technological implementation and commercialisation trajectories, regulation, and policy development need to take account of public priorities and attitudes. More effective co-production practices will ensure the application of genomic technologies to animals aligns with public priorities and are acceptable to society. Consumer rejection of, and limited demand for, animal products developed using novel genomic technologies will determine whether they are integration into the food system. However, little is known about whether genomic technologies that accelerate breeding but do not introduce cross-species genetic changes are more acceptable to consumers than those that do. Five focus groups, held in the north east of England, were used to explore the perceptions of, and attitudes towards, the use of genomic technologies in breeding farm animals for the human food supply chain. Overall, study participants were more positive towards genomic technologies applied to promote animal welfare (e.g., improved disease resistance), environmental sustainability, and human health. Animal “disenhancement” was viewed negatively and increased food production alone was not perceived as a potential benefit. In comparison to gene editing, research participants were most negative about genetic modification and the application of gene drives, independent of the benefits delivered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9245485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92454852022-07-06 Public Perceptions Regarding Genomic Technologies Applied to Breeding Farm Animals: A Qualitative Study Naab, Francis Z. Coles, David Goddard, Ellen Frewer, Lynn J. BioTech (Basel) Article The societal acceptability of different applications of genomic technologies to animal production systems will determine whether their innovation trajectories will reach the commercialisation stage. Importantly, technological implementation and commercialisation trajectories, regulation, and policy development need to take account of public priorities and attitudes. More effective co-production practices will ensure the application of genomic technologies to animals aligns with public priorities and are acceptable to society. Consumer rejection of, and limited demand for, animal products developed using novel genomic technologies will determine whether they are integration into the food system. However, little is known about whether genomic technologies that accelerate breeding but do not introduce cross-species genetic changes are more acceptable to consumers than those that do. Five focus groups, held in the north east of England, were used to explore the perceptions of, and attitudes towards, the use of genomic technologies in breeding farm animals for the human food supply chain. Overall, study participants were more positive towards genomic technologies applied to promote animal welfare (e.g., improved disease resistance), environmental sustainability, and human health. Animal “disenhancement” was viewed negatively and increased food production alone was not perceived as a potential benefit. In comparison to gene editing, research participants were most negative about genetic modification and the application of gene drives, independent of the benefits delivered. MDPI 2021-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9245485/ /pubmed/35822802 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biotech10040028 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Naab, Francis Z.
Coles, David
Goddard, Ellen
Frewer, Lynn J.
Public Perceptions Regarding Genomic Technologies Applied to Breeding Farm Animals: A Qualitative Study
title Public Perceptions Regarding Genomic Technologies Applied to Breeding Farm Animals: A Qualitative Study
title_full Public Perceptions Regarding Genomic Technologies Applied to Breeding Farm Animals: A Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Public Perceptions Regarding Genomic Technologies Applied to Breeding Farm Animals: A Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Public Perceptions Regarding Genomic Technologies Applied to Breeding Farm Animals: A Qualitative Study
title_short Public Perceptions Regarding Genomic Technologies Applied to Breeding Farm Animals: A Qualitative Study
title_sort public perceptions regarding genomic technologies applied to breeding farm animals: a qualitative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35822802
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biotech10040028
work_keys_str_mv AT naabfrancisz publicperceptionsregardinggenomictechnologiesappliedtobreedingfarmanimalsaqualitativestudy
AT colesdavid publicperceptionsregardinggenomictechnologiesappliedtobreedingfarmanimalsaqualitativestudy
AT goddardellen publicperceptionsregardinggenomictechnologiesappliedtobreedingfarmanimalsaqualitativestudy
AT frewerlynnj publicperceptionsregardinggenomictechnologiesappliedtobreedingfarmanimalsaqualitativestudy