Cargando…

Analysis of Two Diverse Nursing Records Applications: Mixed Methods Approach

INTRODUCTION: Poor adoption of electronic health records among healthcare workers can diminish their impact. Healthcare informatics solutions development should diligently acknowledge end-user needs. This study compares a user experience and perceived quality of the nursing process integration in tw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drnovšek, Rok, Milavec Kapun, Marija, Rajkovič, Vladislav, Rajkovič, Uroš
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35855380
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2022-0019
_version_ 1784738751130370048
author Drnovšek, Rok
Milavec Kapun, Marija
Rajkovič, Vladislav
Rajkovič, Uroš
author_facet Drnovšek, Rok
Milavec Kapun, Marija
Rajkovič, Vladislav
Rajkovič, Uroš
author_sort Drnovšek, Rok
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Poor adoption of electronic health records among healthcare workers can diminish their impact. Healthcare informatics solutions development should diligently acknowledge end-user needs. This study compares a user experience and perceived quality of the nursing process integration in two different applications for electronic documentation of the nursing care plan. Both applications were designed and tested in Slovenia. METHODS: In the first phase, final year undergraduate nursing students were recruited (n=73) and randomly assigned into two groups. Each group used one of the applications for a duration of five hours. A survey among students was conducted. In the second phase, additional students were recruited (n=40) and invited to participate in qualitative analysis of the unfavourably rated application. RESULTS: The modern, visually improved application was favourably rated by students in terms of all aspects of application usability. However, students reported a significant number of inadequacies regarding the nursing process methodology integration. On the contrary, the students using the poorly rated and visually outdated application reported no such concerns. Qualitative analysis of student reflections identified additional positive features of software design that were not detected in survey results analysis. CONCLUSION: This study showed that a user-centred approach can be used to compare diverse electronic solutions. Detected discrepancies in findings using qualitative and quantitative analysis show the importance of integrating diverse research approaches for adequate evaluation of software solutions. Furthermore, this study design promotes empowerment of healthcare workers to participate in the development and critical evaluations of software solutions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9245498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92454982022-07-18 Analysis of Two Diverse Nursing Records Applications: Mixed Methods Approach Drnovšek, Rok Milavec Kapun, Marija Rajkovič, Vladislav Rajkovič, Uroš Zdr Varst Research Article INTRODUCTION: Poor adoption of electronic health records among healthcare workers can diminish their impact. Healthcare informatics solutions development should diligently acknowledge end-user needs. This study compares a user experience and perceived quality of the nursing process integration in two different applications for electronic documentation of the nursing care plan. Both applications were designed and tested in Slovenia. METHODS: In the first phase, final year undergraduate nursing students were recruited (n=73) and randomly assigned into two groups. Each group used one of the applications for a duration of five hours. A survey among students was conducted. In the second phase, additional students were recruited (n=40) and invited to participate in qualitative analysis of the unfavourably rated application. RESULTS: The modern, visually improved application was favourably rated by students in terms of all aspects of application usability. However, students reported a significant number of inadequacies regarding the nursing process methodology integration. On the contrary, the students using the poorly rated and visually outdated application reported no such concerns. Qualitative analysis of student reflections identified additional positive features of software design that were not detected in survey results analysis. CONCLUSION: This study showed that a user-centred approach can be used to compare diverse electronic solutions. Detected discrepancies in findings using qualitative and quantitative analysis show the importance of integrating diverse research approaches for adequate evaluation of software solutions. Furthermore, this study design promotes empowerment of healthcare workers to participate in the development and critical evaluations of software solutions. Sciendo 2022-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9245498/ /pubmed/35855380 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2022-0019 Text en © 2022 National Institute of Public Health, Slovenia, published by Sciendo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Drnovšek, Rok
Milavec Kapun, Marija
Rajkovič, Vladislav
Rajkovič, Uroš
Analysis of Two Diverse Nursing Records Applications: Mixed Methods Approach
title Analysis of Two Diverse Nursing Records Applications: Mixed Methods Approach
title_full Analysis of Two Diverse Nursing Records Applications: Mixed Methods Approach
title_fullStr Analysis of Two Diverse Nursing Records Applications: Mixed Methods Approach
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Two Diverse Nursing Records Applications: Mixed Methods Approach
title_short Analysis of Two Diverse Nursing Records Applications: Mixed Methods Approach
title_sort analysis of two diverse nursing records applications: mixed methods approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35855380
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2022-0019
work_keys_str_mv AT drnovsekrok analysisoftwodiversenursingrecordsapplicationsmixedmethodsapproach
AT milaveckapunmarija analysisoftwodiversenursingrecordsapplicationsmixedmethodsapproach
AT rajkovicvladislav analysisoftwodiversenursingrecordsapplicationsmixedmethodsapproach
AT rajkovicuros analysisoftwodiversenursingrecordsapplicationsmixedmethodsapproach