Cargando…

A comparison of rural Australian First Nations and Non-First Nations survey responses to COVID-19 risks and impacts: implications for health communications

INTRODUCTION: This study investigated differences between rural Australian First Nations and non-First Nations survey respondents’ perceptions of COVID-19-related risks and analysed other variables that could predict an exacerbation of anxiety related to COVID-19 harms. METHODS: A cross-sectional on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allan, Julaine, Kleinschafer, Jodie, Saksena, Teesta, Rahman, Azizur, Lawrence, Jayne, Lock, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35773669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13643-6
_version_ 1784738753754955776
author Allan, Julaine
Kleinschafer, Jodie
Saksena, Teesta
Rahman, Azizur
Lawrence, Jayne
Lock, Mark
author_facet Allan, Julaine
Kleinschafer, Jodie
Saksena, Teesta
Rahman, Azizur
Lawrence, Jayne
Lock, Mark
author_sort Allan, Julaine
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study investigated differences between rural Australian First Nations and non-First Nations survey respondents’ perceptions of COVID-19-related risks and analysed other variables that could predict an exacerbation of anxiety related to COVID-19 harms. METHODS: A cross-sectional online and paper survey of rural residents from the western regions of NSW, Australia, was conducted. Descriptive and multivariate statistical analyses were used to assess links between First Nations status and demographic measures including postcode, age, gender, education, rural or town/village location, proximity to medical services and living situation. The analysis included five items related to perceptions about COVID-19: perceived likelihood of contracting COVID-19 in the next 12 months, perceived harmfulness of the virus, how often people felt afraid, perception about respondents’ ability to do something about the virus and perceived economic impacts of the pandemic. RESULTS: There were significant differences between First Nations (n=60) and non-First Nations (n= 639) respondents across all sociodemographic categories. The results reflect a significantly higher level of anxiety among the First Nations Australians in the sample: they felt afraid more often, felt it was highly likely they would catch the virus and if they did catch the virus perceived that it would be very harmful. Living with children under eighteen years of age and in small rural towns were key factors linked to feeling afraid of COVID-19 and First Nations status. CONCLUSION: Health risk communication in pandemic response should include an equitable focus on rural areas, recognising that First Nations Australians are a significant proportion of the rural population with different risk factors and concerns than those of non-First Nations Australians. This principle of First Nations-led design is critical to all health policy and planning. The Australian Government should include rural areas in planning pandemic responses, recognising that First Nations populations are a significant proportion of the rural population creating syndemic conditions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13643-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9245509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92455092022-07-01 A comparison of rural Australian First Nations and Non-First Nations survey responses to COVID-19 risks and impacts: implications for health communications Allan, Julaine Kleinschafer, Jodie Saksena, Teesta Rahman, Azizur Lawrence, Jayne Lock, Mark BMC Public Health Research INTRODUCTION: This study investigated differences between rural Australian First Nations and non-First Nations survey respondents’ perceptions of COVID-19-related risks and analysed other variables that could predict an exacerbation of anxiety related to COVID-19 harms. METHODS: A cross-sectional online and paper survey of rural residents from the western regions of NSW, Australia, was conducted. Descriptive and multivariate statistical analyses were used to assess links between First Nations status and demographic measures including postcode, age, gender, education, rural or town/village location, proximity to medical services and living situation. The analysis included five items related to perceptions about COVID-19: perceived likelihood of contracting COVID-19 in the next 12 months, perceived harmfulness of the virus, how often people felt afraid, perception about respondents’ ability to do something about the virus and perceived economic impacts of the pandemic. RESULTS: There were significant differences between First Nations (n=60) and non-First Nations (n= 639) respondents across all sociodemographic categories. The results reflect a significantly higher level of anxiety among the First Nations Australians in the sample: they felt afraid more often, felt it was highly likely they would catch the virus and if they did catch the virus perceived that it would be very harmful. Living with children under eighteen years of age and in small rural towns were key factors linked to feeling afraid of COVID-19 and First Nations status. CONCLUSION: Health risk communication in pandemic response should include an equitable focus on rural areas, recognising that First Nations Australians are a significant proportion of the rural population with different risk factors and concerns than those of non-First Nations Australians. This principle of First Nations-led design is critical to all health policy and planning. The Australian Government should include rural areas in planning pandemic responses, recognising that First Nations populations are a significant proportion of the rural population creating syndemic conditions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13643-6. BioMed Central 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9245509/ /pubmed/35773669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13643-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Allan, Julaine
Kleinschafer, Jodie
Saksena, Teesta
Rahman, Azizur
Lawrence, Jayne
Lock, Mark
A comparison of rural Australian First Nations and Non-First Nations survey responses to COVID-19 risks and impacts: implications for health communications
title A comparison of rural Australian First Nations and Non-First Nations survey responses to COVID-19 risks and impacts: implications for health communications
title_full A comparison of rural Australian First Nations and Non-First Nations survey responses to COVID-19 risks and impacts: implications for health communications
title_fullStr A comparison of rural Australian First Nations and Non-First Nations survey responses to COVID-19 risks and impacts: implications for health communications
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of rural Australian First Nations and Non-First Nations survey responses to COVID-19 risks and impacts: implications for health communications
title_short A comparison of rural Australian First Nations and Non-First Nations survey responses to COVID-19 risks and impacts: implications for health communications
title_sort comparison of rural australian first nations and non-first nations survey responses to covid-19 risks and impacts: implications for health communications
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35773669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13643-6
work_keys_str_mv AT allanjulaine acomparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications
AT kleinschaferjodie acomparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications
AT saksenateesta acomparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications
AT rahmanazizur acomparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications
AT lawrencejayne acomparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications
AT lockmark acomparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications
AT allanjulaine comparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications
AT kleinschaferjodie comparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications
AT saksenateesta comparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications
AT rahmanazizur comparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications
AT lawrencejayne comparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications
AT lockmark comparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications