Cargando…
A comparison of rural Australian First Nations and Non-First Nations survey responses to COVID-19 risks and impacts: implications for health communications
INTRODUCTION: This study investigated differences between rural Australian First Nations and non-First Nations survey respondents’ perceptions of COVID-19-related risks and analysed other variables that could predict an exacerbation of anxiety related to COVID-19 harms. METHODS: A cross-sectional on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35773669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13643-6 |
_version_ | 1784738753754955776 |
---|---|
author | Allan, Julaine Kleinschafer, Jodie Saksena, Teesta Rahman, Azizur Lawrence, Jayne Lock, Mark |
author_facet | Allan, Julaine Kleinschafer, Jodie Saksena, Teesta Rahman, Azizur Lawrence, Jayne Lock, Mark |
author_sort | Allan, Julaine |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: This study investigated differences between rural Australian First Nations and non-First Nations survey respondents’ perceptions of COVID-19-related risks and analysed other variables that could predict an exacerbation of anxiety related to COVID-19 harms. METHODS: A cross-sectional online and paper survey of rural residents from the western regions of NSW, Australia, was conducted. Descriptive and multivariate statistical analyses were used to assess links between First Nations status and demographic measures including postcode, age, gender, education, rural or town/village location, proximity to medical services and living situation. The analysis included five items related to perceptions about COVID-19: perceived likelihood of contracting COVID-19 in the next 12 months, perceived harmfulness of the virus, how often people felt afraid, perception about respondents’ ability to do something about the virus and perceived economic impacts of the pandemic. RESULTS: There were significant differences between First Nations (n=60) and non-First Nations (n= 639) respondents across all sociodemographic categories. The results reflect a significantly higher level of anxiety among the First Nations Australians in the sample: they felt afraid more often, felt it was highly likely they would catch the virus and if they did catch the virus perceived that it would be very harmful. Living with children under eighteen years of age and in small rural towns were key factors linked to feeling afraid of COVID-19 and First Nations status. CONCLUSION: Health risk communication in pandemic response should include an equitable focus on rural areas, recognising that First Nations Australians are a significant proportion of the rural population with different risk factors and concerns than those of non-First Nations Australians. This principle of First Nations-led design is critical to all health policy and planning. The Australian Government should include rural areas in planning pandemic responses, recognising that First Nations populations are a significant proportion of the rural population creating syndemic conditions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13643-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9245509 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92455092022-07-01 A comparison of rural Australian First Nations and Non-First Nations survey responses to COVID-19 risks and impacts: implications for health communications Allan, Julaine Kleinschafer, Jodie Saksena, Teesta Rahman, Azizur Lawrence, Jayne Lock, Mark BMC Public Health Research INTRODUCTION: This study investigated differences between rural Australian First Nations and non-First Nations survey respondents’ perceptions of COVID-19-related risks and analysed other variables that could predict an exacerbation of anxiety related to COVID-19 harms. METHODS: A cross-sectional online and paper survey of rural residents from the western regions of NSW, Australia, was conducted. Descriptive and multivariate statistical analyses were used to assess links between First Nations status and demographic measures including postcode, age, gender, education, rural or town/village location, proximity to medical services and living situation. The analysis included five items related to perceptions about COVID-19: perceived likelihood of contracting COVID-19 in the next 12 months, perceived harmfulness of the virus, how often people felt afraid, perception about respondents’ ability to do something about the virus and perceived economic impacts of the pandemic. RESULTS: There were significant differences between First Nations (n=60) and non-First Nations (n= 639) respondents across all sociodemographic categories. The results reflect a significantly higher level of anxiety among the First Nations Australians in the sample: they felt afraid more often, felt it was highly likely they would catch the virus and if they did catch the virus perceived that it would be very harmful. Living with children under eighteen years of age and in small rural towns were key factors linked to feeling afraid of COVID-19 and First Nations status. CONCLUSION: Health risk communication in pandemic response should include an equitable focus on rural areas, recognising that First Nations Australians are a significant proportion of the rural population with different risk factors and concerns than those of non-First Nations Australians. This principle of First Nations-led design is critical to all health policy and planning. The Australian Government should include rural areas in planning pandemic responses, recognising that First Nations populations are a significant proportion of the rural population creating syndemic conditions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13643-6. BioMed Central 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9245509/ /pubmed/35773669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13643-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Allan, Julaine Kleinschafer, Jodie Saksena, Teesta Rahman, Azizur Lawrence, Jayne Lock, Mark A comparison of rural Australian First Nations and Non-First Nations survey responses to COVID-19 risks and impacts: implications for health communications |
title | A comparison of rural Australian First Nations and Non-First Nations survey responses to COVID-19 risks and impacts: implications for health communications |
title_full | A comparison of rural Australian First Nations and Non-First Nations survey responses to COVID-19 risks and impacts: implications for health communications |
title_fullStr | A comparison of rural Australian First Nations and Non-First Nations survey responses to COVID-19 risks and impacts: implications for health communications |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of rural Australian First Nations and Non-First Nations survey responses to COVID-19 risks and impacts: implications for health communications |
title_short | A comparison of rural Australian First Nations and Non-First Nations survey responses to COVID-19 risks and impacts: implications for health communications |
title_sort | comparison of rural australian first nations and non-first nations survey responses to covid-19 risks and impacts: implications for health communications |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35773669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13643-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT allanjulaine acomparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications AT kleinschaferjodie acomparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications AT saksenateesta acomparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications AT rahmanazizur acomparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications AT lawrencejayne acomparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications AT lockmark acomparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications AT allanjulaine comparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications AT kleinschaferjodie comparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications AT saksenateesta comparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications AT rahmanazizur comparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications AT lawrencejayne comparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications AT lockmark comparisonofruralaustralianfirstnationsandnonfirstnationssurveyresponsestocovid19risksandimpactsimplicationsforhealthcommunications |