Cargando…

Observed protection against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection following a primary infection: A Danish cohort study among unvaccinated using two years of nationwide PCR-test data

BACKGROUND: The level of protection after a SARS-CoV-2 infection against reinfection and COVID-19 disease remains important with much of the world still unvaccinated. METHODS: Analysing nationwide, individually referable, Danish register data including RT-PCR-test results, we conducted a cohort stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michlmayr, Daniela, Hansen, Christian Holm, Gubbels, Sophie Madeleine, Valentiner-Branth, Palle, Bager, Peter, Obel, Niels, Drewes, Birgitte, Møller, Camilla Holten, Møller, Frederik Trier, Legarth, Rebecca, Mølbak, Kåre, Ethelberg, Steen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35791335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100452
_version_ 1784738753991933952
author Michlmayr, Daniela
Hansen, Christian Holm
Gubbels, Sophie Madeleine
Valentiner-Branth, Palle
Bager, Peter
Obel, Niels
Drewes, Birgitte
Møller, Camilla Holten
Møller, Frederik Trier
Legarth, Rebecca
Mølbak, Kåre
Ethelberg, Steen
author_facet Michlmayr, Daniela
Hansen, Christian Holm
Gubbels, Sophie Madeleine
Valentiner-Branth, Palle
Bager, Peter
Obel, Niels
Drewes, Birgitte
Møller, Camilla Holten
Møller, Frederik Trier
Legarth, Rebecca
Mølbak, Kåre
Ethelberg, Steen
author_sort Michlmayr, Daniela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The level of protection after a SARS-CoV-2 infection against reinfection and COVID-19 disease remains important with much of the world still unvaccinated. METHODS: Analysing nationwide, individually referable, Danish register data including RT-PCR-test results, we conducted a cohort study using Cox regression to compare SARS-CoV-2 infection rates before and after a primary infection among still unvaccinated individuals, adjusting for sex, age, comorbidity and residency region. Estimates of protection against infection were calculated as 1 minus the hazard ratio. Estimates of protection against symptomatic infections and infections leading to hospitalisation were also calculated. The prevalence of infections classified as symptomatic or asymptomatic was compared for primary infections and reinfections. The study also assessed protection against each of the main viral variants after a primary infection with an earlier variant by restricting follow-up time to distinct, mutually exclusive periods during which each variant dominated. FINDINGS: Until 1 July 2021 the estimated protection against reinfection was 83.4% (95%CI: 82.2–84.6%); but lower for the 65+ year-olds (72.2%; 95%CI: 53.2–81.0%). Moderately higher estimates were found for protection against symptomatic disease, 88.3% overall (95%CI: 85.9–90.3%). First-time cases who reported no symptoms were more likely to experience a reinfection (odds ratio: 1.48; 95%CI: 1.35–1.62). By autumn 2021, when infections were almost exclusively caused by the Delta variant, the estimated protection following a recent first infection was 91.3% (95%CI: 89.7–92.7%) compared to 71.4% (95%CI: 66.9–75.3%) after a first infection over a year earlier. With Omicron, a first infection with an earlier variant in the past 3-6 months gave an estimated 51.0% (95%CI: 50.1–52.0%) protection, whereas a first infection longer than 12 months earlier provided only 19.0% (95%CI: 17.2–20.5%) protection. Protection by an earlier variant-infection against hospitalisation due to a new infection was estimated at: 86.6% (95%CI: 46.3–96.7%) for Alpha, 97.2% (95%CI: 89.0–99.3%) for Delta, and 69.8% (95%CI: 51.5–81.2%) for the Omicron variant. INTERPRETATION: SARS-CoV-2 infection offered a high level of sustained protection against reinfection, comparable with that offered by vaccines, but decreased with the introduction of new main virus variants; dramatically so when Omicron appeared. Protection was lower among the elderly but appeared more pronounced following symptomatic compared to asymptomatic infections. The level of estimated protection against serious disease was somewhat higher than that against infection and possibly longer lasting. Decreases in protection against reinfection, seemed primarily to be driven by viral evolution. FUNDING: None.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9245510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92455102022-07-01 Observed protection against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection following a primary infection: A Danish cohort study among unvaccinated using two years of nationwide PCR-test data Michlmayr, Daniela Hansen, Christian Holm Gubbels, Sophie Madeleine Valentiner-Branth, Palle Bager, Peter Obel, Niels Drewes, Birgitte Møller, Camilla Holten Møller, Frederik Trier Legarth, Rebecca Mølbak, Kåre Ethelberg, Steen Lancet Reg Health Eur Articles BACKGROUND: The level of protection after a SARS-CoV-2 infection against reinfection and COVID-19 disease remains important with much of the world still unvaccinated. METHODS: Analysing nationwide, individually referable, Danish register data including RT-PCR-test results, we conducted a cohort study using Cox regression to compare SARS-CoV-2 infection rates before and after a primary infection among still unvaccinated individuals, adjusting for sex, age, comorbidity and residency region. Estimates of protection against infection were calculated as 1 minus the hazard ratio. Estimates of protection against symptomatic infections and infections leading to hospitalisation were also calculated. The prevalence of infections classified as symptomatic or asymptomatic was compared for primary infections and reinfections. The study also assessed protection against each of the main viral variants after a primary infection with an earlier variant by restricting follow-up time to distinct, mutually exclusive periods during which each variant dominated. FINDINGS: Until 1 July 2021 the estimated protection against reinfection was 83.4% (95%CI: 82.2–84.6%); but lower for the 65+ year-olds (72.2%; 95%CI: 53.2–81.0%). Moderately higher estimates were found for protection against symptomatic disease, 88.3% overall (95%CI: 85.9–90.3%). First-time cases who reported no symptoms were more likely to experience a reinfection (odds ratio: 1.48; 95%CI: 1.35–1.62). By autumn 2021, when infections were almost exclusively caused by the Delta variant, the estimated protection following a recent first infection was 91.3% (95%CI: 89.7–92.7%) compared to 71.4% (95%CI: 66.9–75.3%) after a first infection over a year earlier. With Omicron, a first infection with an earlier variant in the past 3-6 months gave an estimated 51.0% (95%CI: 50.1–52.0%) protection, whereas a first infection longer than 12 months earlier provided only 19.0% (95%CI: 17.2–20.5%) protection. Protection by an earlier variant-infection against hospitalisation due to a new infection was estimated at: 86.6% (95%CI: 46.3–96.7%) for Alpha, 97.2% (95%CI: 89.0–99.3%) for Delta, and 69.8% (95%CI: 51.5–81.2%) for the Omicron variant. INTERPRETATION: SARS-CoV-2 infection offered a high level of sustained protection against reinfection, comparable with that offered by vaccines, but decreased with the introduction of new main virus variants; dramatically so when Omicron appeared. Protection was lower among the elderly but appeared more pronounced following symptomatic compared to asymptomatic infections. The level of estimated protection against serious disease was somewhat higher than that against infection and possibly longer lasting. Decreases in protection against reinfection, seemed primarily to be driven by viral evolution. FUNDING: None. Elsevier 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9245510/ /pubmed/35791335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100452 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Michlmayr, Daniela
Hansen, Christian Holm
Gubbels, Sophie Madeleine
Valentiner-Branth, Palle
Bager, Peter
Obel, Niels
Drewes, Birgitte
Møller, Camilla Holten
Møller, Frederik Trier
Legarth, Rebecca
Mølbak, Kåre
Ethelberg, Steen
Observed protection against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection following a primary infection: A Danish cohort study among unvaccinated using two years of nationwide PCR-test data
title Observed protection against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection following a primary infection: A Danish cohort study among unvaccinated using two years of nationwide PCR-test data
title_full Observed protection against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection following a primary infection: A Danish cohort study among unvaccinated using two years of nationwide PCR-test data
title_fullStr Observed protection against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection following a primary infection: A Danish cohort study among unvaccinated using two years of nationwide PCR-test data
title_full_unstemmed Observed protection against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection following a primary infection: A Danish cohort study among unvaccinated using two years of nationwide PCR-test data
title_short Observed protection against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection following a primary infection: A Danish cohort study among unvaccinated using two years of nationwide PCR-test data
title_sort observed protection against sars-cov-2 reinfection following a primary infection: a danish cohort study among unvaccinated using two years of nationwide pcr-test data
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35791335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100452
work_keys_str_mv AT michlmayrdaniela observedprotectionagainstsarscov2reinfectionfollowingaprimaryinfectionadanishcohortstudyamongunvaccinatedusingtwoyearsofnationwidepcrtestdata
AT hansenchristianholm observedprotectionagainstsarscov2reinfectionfollowingaprimaryinfectionadanishcohortstudyamongunvaccinatedusingtwoyearsofnationwidepcrtestdata
AT gubbelssophiemadeleine observedprotectionagainstsarscov2reinfectionfollowingaprimaryinfectionadanishcohortstudyamongunvaccinatedusingtwoyearsofnationwidepcrtestdata
AT valentinerbranthpalle observedprotectionagainstsarscov2reinfectionfollowingaprimaryinfectionadanishcohortstudyamongunvaccinatedusingtwoyearsofnationwidepcrtestdata
AT bagerpeter observedprotectionagainstsarscov2reinfectionfollowingaprimaryinfectionadanishcohortstudyamongunvaccinatedusingtwoyearsofnationwidepcrtestdata
AT obelniels observedprotectionagainstsarscov2reinfectionfollowingaprimaryinfectionadanishcohortstudyamongunvaccinatedusingtwoyearsofnationwidepcrtestdata
AT drewesbirgitte observedprotectionagainstsarscov2reinfectionfollowingaprimaryinfectionadanishcohortstudyamongunvaccinatedusingtwoyearsofnationwidepcrtestdata
AT møllercamillaholten observedprotectionagainstsarscov2reinfectionfollowingaprimaryinfectionadanishcohortstudyamongunvaccinatedusingtwoyearsofnationwidepcrtestdata
AT møllerfrederiktrier observedprotectionagainstsarscov2reinfectionfollowingaprimaryinfectionadanishcohortstudyamongunvaccinatedusingtwoyearsofnationwidepcrtestdata
AT legarthrebecca observedprotectionagainstsarscov2reinfectionfollowingaprimaryinfectionadanishcohortstudyamongunvaccinatedusingtwoyearsofnationwidepcrtestdata
AT mølbakkare observedprotectionagainstsarscov2reinfectionfollowingaprimaryinfectionadanishcohortstudyamongunvaccinatedusingtwoyearsofnationwidepcrtestdata
AT ethelbergsteen observedprotectionagainstsarscov2reinfectionfollowingaprimaryinfectionadanishcohortstudyamongunvaccinatedusingtwoyearsofnationwidepcrtestdata